TOPIC: TEXTILE
Lessons learned during migrations to Grav CMS from Textpattern
21st February 2026
After the most of four years since the arrival of Textpattern 4.8.8, Textpattern 4.9.0 was released. Since, I was running two subsites using the software, I tried one of them out with the new version. That broke an elderly navigation plugin that no longer appears in any repository, prompting a rollback, which was successful. Even so, it stirred some curiosity about alternatives to this veteran of the content management system world, which is pushing on for twenty-two years of age. That might have been just as well, given the subsequent release of Textpattern 4.9.1 because of two reported security issues, one of which affecting all preceding versions of the software.
Well before that came to light, there had been a chat session in a Gemini app on a mobile which travelling on a bus. This started with a simple question about alternatives to Textpattern. The ensuing interaction led me to choose Grav CMS after one other option turned out to involve a subscription charge; A personal website side hustle generating no revenue was not going to become a more expensive sideline than it already was, the same reasoning that stops me paying for WordPress plugins.
Exploring Known Options
Without any recourse to AI capability, I already had options. While WordPress was one of those that was well known to me, the organisation of the website was such that it would be challenging to get everything placed under one instance and I never got around to exploring the multisite capability in much depth. Either way, it would prove to involve quite an amount of restructuring, Even having multiple instances would mean an added amount of maintenance, though I do automate things heavily. The number of attack surfaces because of database dependence is another matter.
In the past, I have been a user of Drupal, though its complexity and the steepness of the associated learning curve meant that I never exploited it fully. Since those were pre-AI days, I wonder how things would differ now. Nevertheless, the need to make parts of a website fit in with each other was another challenge that I failed to overcome in those days. Thus, this content framework approach was not one that I wished to use again. In short, this is an enterprise-grade tool that may be above the level of personal web tinkering, and I never did use its capabilities to their full extent.
The move away from Drupal brought me to Hugo around four years ago. That too presents a learning curve, though its inherent flexibility meant that I could do anything that I want with it once I navigated its documentation and ironed out oversights using web engine searches. This static website generator is what rebuilds a public transport website, a history website comprised of writings by my late father together with a website for my freelancing company. There is no database involved, and you can avoid having any dynamic content creation machinery on the web servers too. Using Git, it is possible to facilitate content publishing from anywhere as well.
Why Grav?
Of the lot, Hugo had a lot going for it. The inherent flexibility would not obstruct getting things to fit with a website wide consistency of appearance, and there is nothing to stop one structuring things how they wanted. However, Grav has one key selling point in comparison: straightforward remote production of content without recourse to local builds being uploaded to a web server. That decouples things from needing one to propagate the build machinery across different locations.
Like Hugo, Grav had an active project behind it and a decent supply of plugins and an architecture that bested Textpattern and its usual languid release cycle. The similarity also extended as far as not having to buy into someone else's theme: any theming can be done from scratch for consistency of appearance across different parts of a website. In Grav's case, that means using the Twig PHP templating engine, another thing to learn and reminiscent of Textpattern's Textile as much as what Hugo itself has.
The centricity of Markdown files was another area of commonality, albeit with remote editing. If you are conversant with page files having a combination of YAML front matter and subsequent page content from Hugo, Grav will not seem so alien to you, even if it has a web interface for editing that front matter. This could help if you need to edit the files directly for any reason.
That is never to say that there were no things to learn, for there was plenty of that. For example, it has its own way of setting up modular pages, an idea that I was to retrofit back into a Hugo website afterwards. This means care with module naming as well as caching, editor choice and content collections, each with their own uniqueness that rewards some prior reading. A learning journey was in the offing, a not attractive part of the experience in any event.
Considerations
There have been a number of other articles published here regarding the major lessons learned during the transitions from Textpattern to Grav. Unlike previous experiences with Hugo, another part of this learning was the use of AI as part of any debugging. At times, there was a need to take things step by step, interacting with the AI instead of trying out a script that it had put my way. There are times when one's own context window gets overwhelmed by the flow of text, meaning that such behaviour needs to be taken in hand.
Another thing to watch is that human consultation of the official documentation is not neglected in a quest for speed that lets the AI do that for you; after all, this machinery is fallible; nothing we ever bring into being is without its flaws. Grav itself also comes from a human enterprise that usefully includes its own Discord community. The GitHub repository was not something to which I had recourse, even if the Admin plugin interface has prompts for reporting issues on there. Here, I provide a synopsis of the points to watch that may add to the help provided elsewhere.
Choosing an Editor
By default, Grav Admin uses CodeMirror as its content editor. While CodeMirror is well-suited to editing code, offering syntax highlighting, bracket matching and multiple cursors, it renders its editing surface in a way that standard browser extension APIs cannot reach. Grammar checkers and spell-check extensions such as LanguageTool rely on native editable elements to detect text, and CodeMirror does not use these. The result is that browser-based writing tools produce no output in Grav Admin at all, which is a confirmed architectural incompatibility rather than a configuration issue documented in the LanguageTool issue tracker.
This can be addressed by replacing CodeMirror using the TinyMCE Editor Integration plugin, installable directly from the Admin plugin interface, which brings a familiar style of editor that browser extensions can access normally. Thus, LanguageTool functionality is restored, the writing workflow stays inside Grav Admin and the change requires only a small amount of configuration to prevent TinyMCE from interfering with Markdown files in undesirable ways. Before coming across the TinyMCE Editor plugin, I was seriously toying with the local editing option centred around a Git-based workflow. Here, using VS Code with the LanguageTool extension like I do for Hugo websites remained a strong possibility. The plugin means that the need to do this is not as pressing as it otherwise might be.
None of this appears to edit Twig templates and other configuration files unless one makes use of the Editor plugin. My brief dalliance with this revealed a clunky interface and interference with the appearance of the website, something that I never appreciated when I saw it with Drupal. Thus, the plugin was quickly removed, and I do not miss it. As it happened, editing and creating files over an SSH connection with a lightweight terminal editor worked well enough for me during the setup phase anyway. If I wanted a nicer editing experience, then a Git-based approach would allow local editing in VSCode before pushing the files back onto the server.
Grav Caching
Unlike WordPress, which requires plugins to do so, Grav maintains its own internal cache for compiled pages and assets. Learning to work with it is part of understanding the platform: changes to CSS, JavaScript and other static assets are served from this cache until it is refreshed. That can be accomplished using the admin panel or by removing the contents of the cache directory directly. Once this becomes second nature, it adds very little overhead to the development process.
Modular Pages
On one of the Textpattern subsites, I had set up the landing page in a modular fashion. This carried over to Grav, which has its own way of handling modular pages. There, the modular page system assembles a single page from the files found within a collection of child folders, each presenting a self-contained content block with its own folder, Markdown file and template.
All modules render together under a single URL; they are non-routable, meaning visitors cannot access them directly. When the parent folder contains a modular.md file, the name tells Grav to use the modular.html.twig template and whose front matter defines which modules to include and in what order.
Module folders are identified by an underscore at the start of their name, and numeric prefixes control the display sequence. The prefix must come before the underscore: _01.main is the correct form. For a home page with many sections this structure scales naturally, with folder names such as 01._title, 04._ireland or 13._practicalities-inspiration making the page architecture immediately readable from the file system alone.
Each module's Markdown filename determines which template renders it: a file named text.md looks for text.html.twig in the theme's modular templates folder. The parent modular.md assembles the modules using @self.modular to collect them, with a custom order list giving precise control over sequence. Once the folder naming convention and the template matching relationship are clear, the system is very workable.
Building Navigation
Given that the original impetus for leaving Textpattern was a broken navigation plugin, ensuring that Grav could replicate the required menu behaviour was a matter of some importance. Grav takes a different approach to navigation from database-driven systems, deriving its menu structure directly from the content directory tree using folder naming conventions and front matter flags rather than a dedicated menu editor.
Top-level navigation is driven by numerically prefixed subfolders within the content directory (pages), so a structure such as 01.home, 02.about and 03.blog yields an ordered working menu automatically. Visibility can be fine-tuned without renaming folders by setting visible: true or visible: false in a page's YAML front matter, and menu labels can be shortened for navigation purposes using the menu: field while retaining a fuller title for the page itself.
The primary navigation loop iterates over the visible children of the pages tree and uses the active and activeChild flags on each page object to highlight the current location, whether the visitor is on a given top-level page directly or somewhere within its subtree. A secondary menu for the current section is assembled by first identifying the active top-level page and then rendering its visible children as a list. Testing for activeChild as well as active in the secondary menu is important, as omitting it means that visitors to grandchild pages see no item highlighted at all. The approach differs from what was possible with Textpattern, where a single composite menu could drill down through the full hierarchy, but displaying one menu for pages within a given section alongside another showing the other sections proves to be a workable and context-sensitive alternative.
Setting Up RSS Feeds
Because Grav does not support the generation of RSS feeds out of the box, it needs a plugin and some extra configuration. The latter means that you need to get your head around the Grav concept of a collection because without it, you will not see anything in your feed. In contrast, database-driven platforms like WordPress or Drupal push out the content by default, which may mean that you are surprised when you first come across how Grav needs you to specify the collections explicitly.
There are two details that make performing configuration of a feed straightforward once understood. The first is that Grav routes do not match physical folder paths: a folder named 03.deliberations on disk is referenced in configuration as /deliberations, since the numeric prefix controls navigation ordering but does not appear in the route, that is the actual web page address. The second is the choice between @page.children, which collects only the immediate children of a folder, and @page.descendants, which collects recursively through all subdirectories. The collection definition belongs in the feed page's front matter, specifying where the content lives, how it should be ordered and in which direction.
Where All This Led
Once I got everything set in place, the end results were pleasing, with much learned along the way. Web page responsiveness was excellent, an experience enhanced by the caching of files. In the above discussion, I hardly mentioned the transition of existing content. For one subsite, this was manual because the scale was smaller, and the Admin plugin's interface made everything straightforward such that all was in place after a few hours of work. In the case of the other, the task was bigger, so I fell on an option used for a WordPress to Hugo migration: Python scripting. That greatly reduced the required effort, allowing me to focus on other things like setting up a modular landing page. The whole migration took around two weeks, all during time outside my client work. There are other places where I can use Grav, which surely will add to what I already have learned. My dalliance with Textpattern is feeling a little like history now.
Investigating Textpattern
9th March 2009
With the profusion of Content Management Systems out there, open source and otherwise, my curiosity has been aroused for a while now. In fact, Automattic's aspirations for WordPress (the engine powering this blog) now seem to go beyond blogging and include wider CMS-style usage. Though some may even have put the thing to those kinds of uses, I believe that it has a way to go before it can put itself on a par with the likes of Drupal and Joomla!.
Speaking of Drupal, I decided to give it a go a while back and came away with the impression that it's a platform for an entire website. At the time, I was attracted by the idea of having one part of a website on Drupal and another using WordPress, but the complexity of the CSS in the Drupal template thwarted my efforts and I desisted. The heavy connection between template and back end cut down on the level of flexibility too. Though that mix of different platforms might seem odd in architectural terms, my main website also had a custom PHP/MySQL-driven photo gallery too and migrating everything into Drupal wasn't going to be something that I was planning. Since I might have been trying to get Drupal to perform a role for which it was never meant, I am not holding its non-fulfillment of my requirements against it. While Drupal may have changed since I last looked at it, I decided to give an alternative a go regardless.
Towards the end of last year, I began to look at Textpattern (otherwise known as Txp) in the same vein, and it worked well enough after a little effort that I was able to replace what was once a visitor dossier with a set of travel jottings. In some respects, Though Textpattern might feel less polished when you start to compare it with alternatives like WordPress or Drupal, the inherent flexibility of its design leaves a positive impression. In short, I was happy to see that it allowed me to achieve what I wanted to do.
If I recall correctly, Textpattern's default configuration is that of a blog, which means that it can be used for that purpose. So, I got in some content and started to morph the thing into what I had in mind. Because my ideas weren't entirely developed, some of that was going on while I went about bending Txp to my will. Most of that involved tinkering in the Presentation part of the Txp interface, though. It differs from WordPress in that the design information like (X)HTML templates and CSS are stored in the database rather than in the file system à la WP. Txp also has its own tag language called Textile and, though it contains conditional tags, I find that encasing PHP in <txp:php></txp:php> tags is a more succinct way of doing things; only pure PHP code can be used in this way and not a mixture of such in <?php ?> tags and (X)HTML. A look at the tool's documentation together with a perusal of Apress' Textpattern Solutions got me going in this new world (it was thus for me, anyway). The mainstay of the template system is the Page, while each Section can use a different Page. Each Page can share components and, in Txp, these get called Forms. These are included in a Page using Textile tags of the form <txp:output_form form="form1" />. Style information is edited in another section and you can have several style sheets too.
The Txp Presentation system is made up of Sections, Pages, Forms and Styles. The first of these might appear in the wrong place when being under the Content tab would seem more appropriate but the ability to attach different page templates to different sections places their configuration where you find it in Textpattern and the ability to show or hide sections might have something to do with it too. As it happens, I have used the same template for all bar the front page of the site and got it to display single or multiple articles as appropriate using the Category system. Though it may be a hack, it appears to work well in practice. Being able to make a page template work in the way that you require really offers a considerable amount of flexibility; it allowed me to go with one sidebar rather than two as found in the default set up.
Txp also has the facility to add plugins (look in the Admin section of the UI) and this is very different from WordPress in that installation involves the loading of an encoded text file, probably for the sake of maintaining the security and integrity of your installation. I added the navigation facility for my sidebar and breadcrumb links in this manner, with back end stuff like Tiny MCE editor and Akismet coming as plugins too. While there may not be as many of these for Textpattern, the ones that I found were enough to fulfil my needs. If there are plugin configuration pages in the administration interface, you will find these under the Extensions tab.
To get the content in, I went with the more laborious copy, paste and amend route. Given that I was coming from the plain PHP/XHTML way of doing things, the import functionality was never going to do much for me with its focus on Movable Type, WordPress, Blogger and b2. The fact that you only import content into a particular section may displease some, too. Peculiarly, there is no easy facility for performing a Textpattern to Textpattern migration apart from doing a MySQL database copy. While some alternatives to this were suggested, none seemed to work as well as the basic MySQL route. Tiny MCE made editing easier once I went and turned off Textile processing of the article text. This was done on a case by case basis because I didn't want to have to deal with any unintended consequences arising from turning it off at a global level.
While on the subject of content, this is also the part of the interface where you manage files and graphics along with administering things like comments, categories and links (like a blog roll on WordPress). Of these, it is the comment or link facilities that I don't use, allowing me to turn comments off in the Txp preferences. So far, I am using categories to bundle together similar articles for appearance on the same page, while also getting to use the image and file management side of things as time goes on.
All in all, it seems to work well, even if I wouldn't recommend it to the sort of audience to whom WordPress might be geared. My reason for saying that is because it is a technical tool that is used best if you are prepared to your hands dirtier from code cutting than other alternatives. I, for one, don't mind that at all because working in that manner might actually suit me. Nevertheless, not all users of the system need to have the same level of knowledge or access; usefully, it is possible to set up users with different permissions to limit their exposure to the innards of the administration. In line with Textpattern's being a publishing tool, you get roles such as Publisher (administrator in other platforms), Managing Editor, Copy Editor, Staff Writer, Freelancer, Designer and None. Those names may mean more to others, but I have yet to check out what those access levels entail because I use it on a single user basis.
Txp may lack certain features, such as graphical visitor statistics instead of the current text listings. While, its administration interface could benefit from refinement, it fulfils my core requirements. The more streamlined approach makes it more practical in my opinion, which is demonstrated by my creation of A Wanderer's Miscellany. Consider exploring it yourself to see what's possible, since I am certain that I have only scratched the surface of Textpattern's capabilities.