Technology Tales

Getting Fedora working in VirtualBox

After a hiatus induced by disk errors seen on start up, I have gone having a go with Fedora again. In the world of real PC's, its place has been taken by Debian, so virtualisation was brought into play for my most recent explorations. I could have gone with 10, the current stable version, but curiosity got the better of me and I downloaded a pre-release version of 11 instead.

On my way to getting that instated, I encountered two issues. The first of these was boot failure with the message like this:

FATAL: INT18: BOOT FAILURE

As it turned out, that was easily sorted. I was performing the installation from a DVD image mounted as if it were a real DVD, and laziness or some other similar reason had me rebooting with it still mounted. Though there is an option to load the hard disk variant, it wasn't happening, resulting in the message that's above. A complete shutdown and replacement of the virtual DVD with a real one set matters to rights.

The next trick was to get Guest Additions added, but Fedora's 2.6.29 was not what VirtualBox was expecting, and it demanded the same ransom as Debian: gcc, make and kernel header files. Unfamiliarity had me firing up Fedora's software installation software, only to find that Synaptic seems to beat it hands down in the search department. Turning to Google dredged up the following command to be executed, which got me further:

yum install binutils gcc make patch libgomp glibc-headers glibc-devel kernel-headers kernel-devel

However, the installed kernel headers didn't match the kernel, but a reboot fixed that once the kernel was updated. Then, the Guest Additions installed themselves as intended, with necessary compilations to match the installed kernel.

The procedures that I have described here would, it seems, work for Fedora 10; well, they certainly have bequeathed me a working system. I have had a little poke and a beta of Firefox 3.5 is included, and I saw sign of OpenOffice 3.1 too. So, it looks very cutting edge, easily so in comparison with Ubuntu and Debian. Apart from one or niggles, it seems to run smoothly too. Firstly, don't use the command shutdown -h now to close the thing down, or you'll cause VirtualBox to choke. Using the usual means ensures that all goes well, though. The other irritation is that it doesn't connect to the network without a poke from me. Whether SELinux is to blame for this or not, I cannot tell, but it might be something for consideration by the powers than be. That these are the sorts of things that I have noticed should be telling you that I have no major cause for complaint. While I have mulled over a move to Fedora in the past and that option remains as strong as ever, Ubuntu is not forcing me to look at an alternative and the fact that I know how to achieve what I need is resulting in inertia anyway.

On keyboards

While there cannot be too many Linux users who go out and partner a Microsoft keyboard with their system, my recent cable-induced mishap has resulted in exactly that outcome. Keyboards are such standard items that it is not so possible to generate any excitement about them, apart from RSI-related concerns. While I wasn't about to go for something cheap and nasty that would do me an injury, going for something too elaborate wasn't part of the plan either, even if examples of that ilk from Microsoft and Logitech were sorely tempting.

Shopping in a bricks and mortar store, like I was, has its pluses and its minuses. The main plus points are that you see and feel what you are buying, with the main drawback being that the selection on offer isn't likely to be as extensive as you'd find on the web, even if I was in a superstore. Despite the latter, there was still a good deal available. Though there were PS/2 keyboards for anyone needing them, USB ones seemed to be the main offer, with wireless examples showcased too. Strangely, the latter were only available as kits with mice included, further adding to the cost of an already none too cheap item. The result was that I wasn't lured away from the wired option.

While I didn't emerge with what would have been my first choice because that was out of stock, that's not to say that what I have doesn't do the job for me. The key action is soft and cushioned, which is a change from that to which I am accustomed; some keyboards feel like they belong on a laptop, but not this one. There are other bells and whistles too, with a surprising number of them working. The calculator and email buttons number among these along with the play/pause, back and forward ones for a media player; I am not so convinced about the volume controls though an on-screen indicator does pop up. You'd expect a Microsoft item to be more Windows specific than others, yet mine works as well as anything else in the Ubuntu world and I have no reason to suspect that other Linux distros would spurn it either. Keyboards tend to be one of those "buy-it-and-forget-it" items, and the new arrival should be no different.

Some things that I'd miss on moving from Linux to Windows

The latest buzz surrounding Windows 7 has caused one observer to suggest that it's about to blast Linux from the desktop. While my experiences might be positive, there are still things that I like about Linux that make me reluctant to consider switching back. Here are a few in no particular order:

Virtual Desktops (or Workspaces)

I find these very handy for keeping things organised when I have a few applications open at the same time. While I think that someone has come with a way of adding the same functionality to Windows, I'd need to go looking for that. Having everything cluttering up a single taskbar would feel a bit limiting.

Symbolic Links

If you have not come across these before, they are a little difficult to explain, but it's great to have the ability to make the contents of a folder appear in more than one place at a time without filling up your hard drive. While it's true to say that Windows 7 gets Libraries, I have a soft spot for the way that Linux does it so simply.

Lack of (intrusive) fidgeting

One of Windows' biggest problems is that it's such a massive target for attacks by the less desirable elements of the web community. The result is a multitude of security software vendors wanting to get their wares onto your PC; it's when they get there that all the fidgeting starts. The cause is the constant need for system monitoring that eats up resources that could be used for other things. Though I know some packages are less intrusive than others, I do like the idea of feeling as if I am in full control of my PC rather someone else taking decisions for me (unavoidable in the world of work, I know). An example of this is Norton's not allowing me to shut it down when it goes rogue, even when acting as Administrator. While I can see the reason for this in that it's trying to hamper the attentions of nefarious malware, it ends up making me feel less than empowered and I also like to feel trusted too. Another thing that I like is the idea of something awaiting my input rather than going away and trying to guess what I need and getting it wrong, an experience that seems typical of Microsoft software.

Command Line

Though this is less of a miss than it used to be, there is now a learning curve with PowerShell's inclusion with Windows 7, and it's not something that I want to foist on myself without my having the time to learn its ins and outs. Though it's not a bad skill to have listed on the proverbial CV, I now know my way around bash and its ilk while knowing where to look when I intend to take things further.

After these, there are other personal reasons for my sticking with Linux, like memories of bad experiences with Windows XP and the way that Linux just seems to get on with the job. Its being free of charge is another bonus, and the freedom to have things as you want makes you feel that you have a safer haven in this ever-changing digital world. While I am not sure if I'd acquire the final version of Windows 7, I am certain that it will not be replacing Linux as my main home computing platform, something that should come as no surprise given what I have said above.

Copying only updated and new files

With Linux/UNIX, the command line remains ever useful and allows you to do all manner of things, including file copying that only adds new files to a destination. Here's a command that accomplishes this on Linux:

cp -urv [source] [destination]

The u switch does the update while r ensures recursion (by default, cp only copies files from a source directory and not anything sitting in subfolders) and v tells the command to tell the user what is happening.

Though buried and hardly promoted, Windows also has its command line and here's what accomplishes a similar result:

xcopy /d /u [source] [destination]

Anything's better than having to approve or reject every instance where source and destination files are the same or, even worse, to overwrite a file when it is not wanted.

How much space is that folder taking up on your disk?

On Windows, it's a matter of right-clicking on the folder and looking in its properties. I am sure that there is a better way of doing it in that ever pervasive operating system but, in the worlds of Linux and UNIX, the command line comes to the rescue as it is wont to do. What follows is the command that I use:

du -sh foldername

The s option makes it present the total space taken up; leaving it out gets you a breakdown of how much space the subfolders are taking up as well. The h makes the sizes output more friendly to human eyes with things like 10K, 79M and 51G littering what you get. The command itself is a much shorter way of saying "print disk usage". It's all quick and easy when you know it, and very useful in this age of ever-increasing data volumes.

A quick way to create a blank text file

The primary job done by the touch command in UNIX or Linux is to update the time stamps on files. However, it also has another function: creating an empty text file where you are "touching" a file that doesn't exist. This has its uses, particularly when you want to reduce the amount of pointing and clicking that you need to do, or you want to generate a series of empty files in a shell script. Whatever you do with it is up to you.

Quickly surveying free disk space on UNIX and Linux

Keeping an eye on disk space on a Solaris server is important for me at work, while keeping the same top level overview is good for my use of Linux at home too. Luckily, there's a simple command that delivers the goods:

df -h 2>/dev/null

The df -h piece is what delivers the statistics while the 2> /dev/null rids the terminal of any error messages; ones stating that access has been denied are common and can cloud the picture.

Keyboard shortcuts for changing desktops in Ubuntu

I am more than a little surprised that I didn't encounter these earlier: Ctrl + Alt + Left Arrow Key moves left, and Ctrl + Alt + Right Arrow Key moves right through your Ubuntu desktops or workspaces. It's always handy to be able to save on mouse work while doing this sort, so these could prove useful. I wouldn't be at all surprised if they applied to other Linux distros too.

A year in the making…

It was a year ago that I set this blog on the go. Then, I was exploring the possibilities offered by WordPress.com. After some months, I decided that I wanted to make my own decisions rather than have them, so I went independent in June. Between those dates, some big launches took my attention: Windows Vista, Office 2007 & CS3 come to mind. All the while, my experience of UNIX, Oracle and other such matters kept growing more and more. In the latter half of the year, I finally made the leap from Windows to Linux on the home computing front, a decision that taught me a lot and one that I don't regret. Other subjects featured from time to time as well; my musings on web development and blogging made their appearance too. 2007 was a packed year on the technology front, and 2008 is only just getting under way. There's a Vista laptop, and I am already picking up ideas for posts, though I am not going to force them out like I might have tried to do last year. 2008 may be a spot more leisurely, but I hope that it's just as interesting.

A pleasant surprise…

Yesterday, when taking the screen grab for my post on Quanta Plus, I did the Alt + Print Screen shuffle as usual. However, when I did so, I was greeted with a dialogue box asking me where I wanted to store the PNG file that was to be produced and what I wanted to call it. The operation was as swish as that. On Windows, the screenshot gets stuffed into the clipboard for you to extricate it with your graphics editor of choice, so this was an interesting surprise. It's the sort of thing that can make a good impression, and it is striking that Linux seems to be ahead of Windows on this one. Who said Linux was less than user-friendly?