TOPIC: USER INTERFACE TECHNIQUES
Keyboard shortcut for Euro currency symbol on Windows 10
21st April 2018
Because I now have business dealings in Ireland, there is a need to add in the Euro currency symbol to emails even though I based in the U.K. and use U.K. keyboard settings. While there is the possibility to insert the symbol in Microsoft Office and other applications, using a simple keyboard shortcut is more efficient since it avoids multiple mouse clicks. For some reason, CTRL + SHIFT + E got into my head as the key combination, but that turns on the Track Changes facility in Word. Instead, CTRL + ALT + 4 does the needful and that is what I will be keeping in mind for future usage.
Smarter file renaming using PowerShell
14th November 2014
It appears that the Rename-Item commandlet in PowerShell is a very useful tool when it comes to smarter renaming of files. Even text substitution is a possibility, and what follows is an example that takes the output of the Dir command for listing the files in a directory and replaces hyphens with underscores in each one.
Dir | Rename-Item –NewName { $_.name –replace “-“,”_” }
The result is that something like the-file.txt becomes the_file.txt. This behaviour is reminiscent of the rename command found on Linux and UNIX systems, where regular expressions can be used, like in the following example that has the same result as the above:
rename 's/-/_/g' *
In both cases, you do need to be careful as to what files are in a directory for this, though the wildcard syntax on Linux or UNIX will be more familiar to anyone who has worked with files via almost any command line. Another thing to watch in the UNIX world is that * parses the whole directory structure, and that could be something that is not wanted for much of the time.
All of this is a far cry from the capabilities of the ren or rename command used in the days of MS-DOS and what has become the legacy Windows command line. Apart from simple renaming, any attempt at tweaking a filename through substitution ended up with the extra string getting appended to filenames when I tried it. Thus, the PowerShell option looks better in comparison.
Turning off the full height editor option in WordPress 4.0
10th September 2014
Though I casually follow WordPress development, it's not nearly as rigorous as when I submitted a patch that earned me a mention on a main WordPress release's contributor list. This may explain why I barely noticed the full editor setting, which is turned on by default.
WordPress has become so mature now that I almost do not expect major revisions like the overhauls received by the administration back-end in 2008. The second interface was got so right that it still is with us, even if there were concerns in my mind at the time as to how usable it would be. Sometimes, those initial suspicions can come to nothing.
However, WordPress 4.0 introduced a major editor change that I'm not sure is successful. A full-height editor sounds good in principle, but its implementation has rough edges that make me wonder if any UX person reviewed it. Scrolling becomes strange, with the editor's toolbar fixing in place when you scroll down far enough. The sidebar then scrolls out of sync with the editor box, creating an odd sensation. Keyboard shortcuts like CTRL + HOME and CTRL + END don't work properly, which convinced me this new arrangement wasn't for me and I wanted to disable it.
A Google search found nothing useful, so I tried the WordPress.org forum. This revealed I should have looked in the screen options dropdown box for "Expand the editor to match the window height" to deselect it. Because of a Visual Editor control there, I'd checked the user profile screen but found nothing, showing the setup logic is poor. Perhaps the Visual Editor option should be a screen option too. Thankfully, the window height editor setting only needs changing once for both posts and pages, covering all situations.
With a distraction-free editing option available, I'm not sure why someone added the full height editor too. If WordPress keeps this feature, it needs refinement to behave more conventionally. I wouldn't build a website with such ill-synchronised scrolling. This needs work, as does the Visual Editor setting location. Perhaps both settings should be at the user level, rather than having one above that level. Before finding the solution, I considered using distraction-free mode permanently and installed the WP Editor plugin. I kept the plugin for its code highlighting, even though entering code view always creates a new revision. Despite this issue, things are now better.
A look at Emacs
10th August 2010
It's remarkable what work can bring your way in terms of technology. For me, (GNU) Emacs Has proved to be such a thing recently. It may have been around since 1975, long before my adventures in computing ever started, in fact, but I am asking myself why I never really have used it much. There are vague recollections of my being aware of its existence in the early days of my using UNIX over a decade ago. Was it a shortcut card with loads of seemingly esoteric keyboard shortcuts and commands that put me off it back then? The truth may have been that I got bedazzled with the world of Microsoft Windows instead, and so began a distraction that lingered until very recently. As unlikely as it looks now, Word and Office would have been part of the allure of what some consider as the dark side these days. O how OpenOffice.org and their ilk have changed that state of affairs...
The unfortunate part of the Emacs story might be that its innovations were never taken up as conventions by mainstream computing. If its counterparts elsewhere used the same keyboard shortcuts, it would feel like learning such an unfamiliar tool. Still, it's not as if there isn't logic behind it because it will work both in a terminal session (where I may have met it for the first time) and a desktop application GUI. The latter is the easier to learn, and the menus list equivalent keyboard shortcuts for many of their entries, too. For a fuller experience though, I can recommend the online manual, and you can buy it in paper form too if you prefer.
One thing that I discovered recently is that external factors can sour the impressions of a piece of software. For instance, I was using a UNIX session where the keyboard mapping wasn't optimal. There's nothing like an unfamiliar behaviour for throwing you off track because you feel that your usual habits are being obstructed. For instance, finding that a Backspace key is behaving like a Delete one is such an obstruction. It wasn't the fault of Emacs, and I have found that using Ctrl+K (C-k in the documentation) to delete whole lines is invaluable.
Apart from keyboard mapping niggles, Emacs has to be respected as a powerful piece of software in its own right. It may not have the syntax highlighting capabilities of some, like gedit or NEdit for instance, but I have a hunch that a spot of Lisp programming would address that need. What you get instead is support for version control systems like RCS or CVS, along with integration with GDB for debugging programs written in a number of languages. Then, there are features like file management, email handling, newsgroup browsing, a calendar and a calculator that make you wonder if they tried to turn a text editor into something like an operating system. With Google trying to use Chrome as the basis of one, it almost feels as is Emacs was ahead of its time, though that may have been more due to its needing to work within a UNIX shell in those far-off pre-GUI days. It really is saying something that it has stood the test of time when so much has fallen by the wayside. Like Vi, it looks as if the esteemable piece of software is showing no signs of going away just yet. Maybe it was well-designed in the beginning, and the thing certainly seems more than a text editor with its extras. Well, it has to offer a good reason for making its way into Linux too...
Bringing Virtual Desktops to Windows with VirtuaWin
1st July 2010
One of the nice things about working with Linux/UNIX is that you can organise your open applications so that they are open in different workspaces or virtual desktops. When I return to working on Windows, having everything open on the same desktop is something that I find less tidy. However, there is an open-source application that adds virtual desktops to Windows and very useful it is too.
It is called VirtuaWin, and it adds an icon to the taskbar for switching between workspaces when it is running; there might be a bit of tweaking to be done for it to stay visible all the time, though. You can have it as a startup application in the same way that you have your security software, and I have been using it smoothly on both Windows XP and Windows 7 running in VirtualBox virtual machines. Insofar as I have seen it, you can have as many workspaces as you want and switching from one to another is achievable using keyboard shortcuts. Using CTRL, ALT and one of the arrow keys does it for me, but you can set up your own. All in all, it's a small download that brings a little sense of Windows desktop computing.
Useful keyboard shortcuts for managing the window sizes of Windows applications
9th June 2008
Maximising and minimising windows is all part and parcel of using window-based user interfaces, so it's nice to know that there are keyboard shortcuts that reduce the need to use your mouse all the time. Here are a few that work on Windows:
Alt+Space+N Minimise
Alt+Space+X Maximise
Alt+Space+R Restore (set to default)
Keyboard shortcuts for changing desktops in Ubuntu
4th April 2008
I am more than a little surprised that I didn't encounter these earlier: Ctrl + Alt + Left Arrow Key moves left, and Ctrl + Alt + Right Arrow Key moves right through your Ubuntu desktops or workspaces. It's always handy to be able to save on mouse work while doing this sort, so these could prove useful. I wouldn't be at all surprised if they applied to other Linux distros too.
Navigating multiple workspaces: A Linux and UNIX advantage over Windows?
16th November 2007
One of the nice things about the world of Linux and UNIX is the availability of multiple workspaces. In Window, you only ever get one, and the likes of me can easily fill up that task bar. So the idea of parcelling off different applications to different screens is useful from a housekeeping point of view so long as icons only appear in the task bar for the open workspace; Ubuntu respects this but openSUSE doesn't, a possible source of irritation.
However, a case can be made that UNIX/Linux needs workspaces more than Windows because of the multi-window interfaces of some of the software applications. The trouble with each of these sub-windows is that an entry appears in the task bar for each of this, rapidly creating a mess. And it can also be an issue working out which window closes the lot.
Examples of the above that come to my mind include GIMP, XSane and SAS. The Windows version of the latter's DMS is confined to a single application window while the UNIX incarnation is composed of a window each for individual components like program editor, log, output, etc. Typing "bye" in the command line of the program editor is enough to dispatch the GUI. With GIMP, Ctrl+Q will close it down in any window, apart from the "Tip of the Day" one that pops up when GIMP is started. The same sort of behaviour also seems to dispatch XSane too.
Switching from one workspace to another is as easy as clicking the relevant icon in the task bar in all the UNIX variants that I have used. Switching an application from one workspace to another has another common thread: finding the required entry in the application window menu.
On Ubuntu, I have seen other ways of working with workspaces. In the interface with visual effects turned off, hovering over the workspace icons in the task bar allows you to move from one to another with the wheel of your mouse. Moving an application between workspaces can be done as simply as dragging boxes from one task bar icon to another. Turning on the visual effects changes things, though. It might appear that the original functionality still works, but that seems not to be the case: a matter for Canonical to resolve, perhaps?
The visual effects do provide other ways around this, though. Keeping all your application windows minimised means that you can run through workspaces themselves with your wheel mouse. Moving applications between workspaces becomes as simple as grabbing the title bar and pulling the window left or right until it changes workspace. Be careful that you do the job fully, though, or you could have an application sitting astride two workspaces. It would appear that ideas from the sharing of a desktop across multiple monitors have percolated through to workspace behaviour.
Aside (regarding Ubuntu visual effects): I don't know who came up with the idea of having windows wobble when they're being moved around, but it certainly is unusual, as is seeing what happens when you try prising a docked window from its mooring (particularly when you're pulling it up from the bottom task bar). The sharper font display and bevelled screen furniture make more sense to me, though; they certainly make a UI more appealing and modern.
Other uses for the middle mouse button
11th November 2007
Here's another one of those things that I discovered while being clumsy: in Firefox, click on your middle mouse button/wheel while hovering over a tab, and it will close it; you don't even need to click on the close icon. Evince, the PDF viewer favoured by Ubuntu, also makes use of the middle mouse button: for panning your way through documents using the hand tool. In a moment of lateral thinking, I tried the same trick with Adobe Reader; in version 7.x, it works in the same way. On Windows at least, Adobe Reader 8.x is a different animal and features automatic scrolling, a very useful proposition for the reading of eBooks if the text doesn't pass by you too quickly, and even a moderately reliable read aloud feature.
FCKEditor for WordPress
26th July 2007
Because the standard WordPress post editor got broken on this blog, my mind turned to replacing it, especially when I spied plugins for adding FCKEditor to the thing. Dean Lee's is the one that I am using, and it seems to work well so far too. As this is FCKEditor, there are more editing options than those offered by the WordPress standard and that's even with the advanced options made visible with the Alt+V/Alt+Shift+V keyboard shortcuts; the former is for IE and the latter for Firefox. We'll see how it goes from here...