Technology Tales

Seeing how things develop

One of the things that I do out of curiosity and self-interest is to keep tabs on what is happening with development versions of software that I use. It is for this reason that I always have a development version of WordPress on the go to ensure that the next stable version doesn't bring my blog to its knees. There have been contributions from my own self to the development effort, mainly in the form of bug reports, with the occasional bug fix too.

In the same vein, I have had a development version of Ubuntu installed in a VirtualBox virtual machine. While there have been breakages and reinstallations along the way when an update results in disruption, it is intriguing, too, to see how a Linux distribution comes to fruition. In the early days of Karmic Koala (9.10), everything was thrown together more loosely and advances looked less obvious. While it is true to say the ext4 file systems support was already in place, the interface looked like a tweaked version of the standard GNOME desktop. Over time, the desktop has been customised and boot messages hidden out of sight. Eye candy like new icons and backgrounds have begun to entice while other features such as an encrypted home folder, Software Store and Ubuntu One all come into place. Installation screens became slicker and boot times reduced. All of this may seem incremental, but revolutions can break things, and you only have to look at the stuttering progress of Windows to see that. Even with all of these previews, I still plan to do a test run of the final revision of 9.10 before committing to putting it in place on my main home PC. Bearing the scars of misadventures over the years has taught me well.

Though Windows development is a less open process, I have been partial to development versions there too. In fact, beta and release candidate installations of Windows 7 have convinced me to upgrade from Windows XP for those times when a Windows VM needs to be fired up in anger. A special offer has had me ordering in advance and sitting back and waiting. With my Windows needs being secondary to my Linux activities, I am not so fussed about taking my time and I have no intention of binning Windows XP just yet anyway.

The trouble with all of this previewing is that you get buffeted by the ongoing development. That is very true of Ubuntu 9.10 and has been very much part and parcel of the heave that brought WordPress 2.7 into being last year. Things get added and then removed as development tries to find that sweet spot, or a crash results, forcing you to rebuild things. It is small wonder that you are told not to put unfinished software on a production system. Another consequence might be that you really question why you are watching all of this and come to decide that what you already have is a place of safety in comparison to what's coming. So far, that has never turned out to be true, but there's no harm in looking before you leap either.

Ubuntu upgrades: do a clean installation or use Update Manager?

Part of some recent "fooling" brought on by the investigation of what turned out to be a duff DVD writer was a fresh installation of Ubuntu 8.10 on my main home PC. It might have brought on a certain amount of upheaval, but it was nowhere near as severe as that following the same sort of thing with a Windows system. While a few hours was all that was needed, whether it is better to perform just an upgrade every time a new Ubuntu release is unleashed on the world or to go for a complete virgin installation instead. With Ubuntu 9.04 in the offing, that question takes on a more immediate significance than it otherwise might do.

Various tricks make the whole reinstallation idea more palatable. For instance, many years of Windows usage have taught me the benefits of separating system and user files. The result is that my home directory lives on a different disk to my operating system files. Add to that the experience of being able to reuse that home drive across different Linux distros, and even swapping from one distro to another becomes feasible. From various changes to my secondary machine, I can vouch that this works for Ubuntu, Fedora and Debian; the latter is what currently powers the said PC. Though you might have to use superuser powers to attend to ownership and access issues, the portability is certainly there, and it applies to anything kept on other disks too.

Naturally, there's always the possibility of losing programs that you have had installed, but losing the clutter can be liberating too. However, assembling a script made up of one or more apt-get install commands can allow you to get many things back at a stroke. For example, I have a test web server (Apache/MySQL/PHP/Perl) set up, so this would be how I'd get everything back in place before beginning further configuration. It might be no bad idea to back up your collection of software sources, either; I have yet to add all the ones that I have been using back into Synaptic. Then there are closed source packages such as VirtualBox (yes, I know that there is an open-source edition) and Adobe Reader. After reinstating the former, all my virtual machines were available for me to use again, without further ado. Restoring the latter allowed me to grab version 9.1 (probably more secure anyway) and it inveigles itself into Firefox now too so the number of times that I need to go through the download shuffle before seeing the contents of a PDF are much reduced, though not eliminated by the Windows-like ability to see a PDF loaded in a browser tab. Moving from software to hardware for a moment, it looks like any bespoke actions such as my activating an Epson Perfection 4490 Photo scanner need to be repeated, but that was all that I had to do. Getting things back into order is not so bad, even if you have to allow a modicum of time for this.

What I have discussed so far are what might be categorised as the common or garden aspects of a clean installation, yet I have seen some behaviours that make me wonder if the usual Ubuntu upgrade path is sufficiently complete in its refresh of your system. The counterpoint to all of this is that I may not have been looking for some of these things before now. That may apply to my noticing that DSLR support seems to be better with my Canon and Pentax cameras both being picked up and mounted for me as soon as they are connected to a PC, the caveat being that they are themselves powered on for this to happen. Another surprise that may be new is that the BBC iPlayer's Listen Again works without further work from the user, a very useful development. It obviously wasn't that way before I carried out the invasive means. My previous tweaking might have prevented the in situ upgrade from doing its thing, but I do see the point of not upsetting people's systems with an overly aggressive update process, even if it means that some advances do not make themselves known.

So what's my answer regarding which way to go once Ubuntu Jaunty Jackalope appears? For the sake of avoiding initial disruption, I'd be inclined to go down the Update Manager route first, while reserving the right to do a fresh installation later on. All in all, I am left with the gut feeling is that the jury is still out on this one.

Whither Fedora?

There is a reason why things have got a little quieter on this blog: my main inspiration for many posts that make their way on here, Ubuntu, is just working away without much complaint. Since BBC iPlayer isn't working so well for me at the moment, I need to have a look at my setup. Otherwise, everything is continuing quietly. In some respects, that's no bad thing and allows me to spend my time doing other things like engaging in hill walking, photography and other such things. While I suppose that the calm is also a reflection of the fact that Ubuntu has matured, there is a sense that some changes may be on the horizon. For one thing, there are the opinions of a certain Mark Shuttleworth, though the competition is progressing too.

That latter point brings me to Linux Format's recently published verdict that Fedora has overtaken Ubuntu. I do have a machine with Fedora that performs what I ask of it without any trouble. However, I have never been on it trying all the sorts of things that I ask of Ubuntu, so my impressions are not in-depth ones. Going deeper into the subject mightn't be such a bad use of a few hours. What I am not planning to do is convert my main Ubuntu machine to Fedora. I moved from Windows because of constant upheavals and I have no intention to bring those upon me without good reason, something that's just not there at the moment.

Speaking of upheavals, one thought that is entering my mind is that of upgrading that main machine. Since its last rebuild was over three years ago, computer technology has moved on a bit since then, with dual and quad-core CPU's from Intel and AMD coming into the fray. Of course, the cost of all of this needs to be considered too, which is never more true than in these troubled economic times. If you asked me about the prospect of a system upgrade a few weeks ago, I would have ruled it out of hand.

What has got me wondering is my continued used of virtualisation and the resources that it needs. Mad notions like running more than one VM at once will put any CPU or memory through their paces. Another attractive idea would be getting a new and bigger screen, particularly with what you can get for around £100 these days. However, my 17" Iiyama is doing well enough to consign this one to the wish list for now. None of the changes that I have described are imminent, even if I have noticed how fast I am filling disks up with digital images to make an expansion of hard disk capacity a higher priority.

If I ever get to do a full system rebuild with a new CPU, memory and motherboard (I am not so sure about graphics since I am no gamer), the idea of moving into the world of 64-bit computing comes about. Since the maximum amount of memory usable by 32-bit software is 4 GB, 64-bit software is a must if I decide to go beyond this limit. That all sounds very fine, aside from the possibility of problems arising with support for legacy hardware. It sounds like another bridge to be assessed before its crossing, even if two upheavals can be made into one.

Besides system breakages, the sort of hardware and software changes over which I have been musing here are optional and can be done in my own time. That's probably just as well in a downturn like we are experiencing now. Being careful with money becomes more important at times like these, which means that it's fortunate that free software not only offers freedom of choice and usage but also a way to leave the closed commercial software acquisition treadmill with all of its cost implications, leaving money for much more important things.

No disruption here

It was just over a year ago that I gave Linux a go after Windows XP gave me a torrid time of it. Since then, I have been able to work more than happily with it and have picked a few new and useful tricks along the way too. All in all, it has been a good experience and I have been able to resolve most of the issues that I have seen. The various Ubuntu upgrades along the way have been taken in their stride, too. Version 7.04 was the first one, with version 7.10 coming immediately afterwards. 8.04 went in equally seamlessly as did 8.10. Some may decry what they might perceive as the glacial nature of any changes, but the flip-side is that change can cause disruption, so my vote is for the more gradual approach, whatever others might think. In line with this, I haven't noticed too many changes in Ubuntu's latest release, and any that I have seen have been of the pleasant kind. Saying that, it's so much better than the contortions surrounding Windows upgrades. All in all, Linux is being kind to me and I hope that it stays that way.

Forcing Ubuntu (and Debian) to upgrade to a newer distribution version

Ubuntu is usually good at highlighting the existence of a new version of the distribution through its Update Manager. That means that 8.10 should be made available to you at the end of the month, so long as you have sorted the relevant setting for 8.04 to realise what has happened. That lives in System > Administration > Software Sources > Updates. If you haven't done that, then 8.04 will continue regardless, since it is a long term supported release.

Otherwise, it's over to the command line to sort you out. One of the ones below will do, with the first just carrying out a check for a new stable version of Ubuntu and the second going all the way:

sudo update-manager -c

sudo update-manager -p

if you are feeling more adventurous, you can always try the development version and this checks for one of those (I successfully used this to try out the beta release of Intrepid Ibex from within a Wubi instance on my laptop):

sudo update-manager -d

Neither of the above are available on Debian, so they seem to be Ubuntu enhancements. That is not to imply that you cannot force the issue with Debian; it's just that the more generic variant is used and, unless, you have gone fiddling with visudo, you will need to run this as root (it works in Ubuntu too):

update-manager --dist-upgrade

A first look at Ubuntu 8.10

I must admit that my curiosity got the better of me when screenshots of Ubuntu's 8.10, otherwise known as Intrepid Ibex, started to make their appearance. Since it is only at alpha2 stage, it's definitely a no-no for production systems. However, it does run surprisingly smoothly even at this stage. Yes, I have seen rough edges and the biggest of them all has made me install it onto my spare PC; there is certainly a tendency for systems to hang when you try running 8.10 in virtual machines, my preferred method for these kinds of explorations. Try it in VirtualBox and kernel panic messages ensue while you can log in on VMware Workstation only for the desktop never to load. While those could be major deficiencies for some, they have both been reported, with the former being seen by many and the latter being flagged by my own self.

Because I was using a version with the alternate installer, the usual slickness that we expect of Ubuntu installations wasn't apparent. Though I am sure that will change in time for the final release, I didn't find it too taxing to get things going with this means. Despite current changes, I expect a more familiar interface will return during later development cycles, certainly well before the final version is released. Because I was installing over the top of a previous Ubuntu installation, I didn't want to lose everything, but I needed to leave it to wipe out the previous root system partition for it to continue without freezing. Since my home directory resides on a separate partition, the transition occurred smoothly, with settings like desktop backgrounds being automatically detected without any complications. One thing that might annoy some is that all this takes manual intervention; you don't get the sort of non-destructive and seamless upgrade capability that openSUSE 11 gives.

What you get when the installation is completed is a Linux desktop that won't look too different from what we are used to using. The update introduces the New Human theme, featuring elegant chocolate-coloured elements that replace the previous default orange-brown colour scheme. They need to sort out a bug (another of my reports)  where black text is being displayed on dark backgrounds on the default display of dropdown menus in Firefox and maybe look into why changing the level of enhancements from Compiz Fusion messes up the display of the workspace switcher in the task bar, but it's fine apart from this.

Otherwise, it's a case of steady as she goes with OpenOffice 2.4, Firefox 3 and so on. That may change as time goes on, with OpenOffice 3 looming on the horizon. For some, all this continuity is all well and good, but I could foresee comments front some parts that nothing dramatic is happening, and that Ubuntu cannot afford to stand still with the advances of Fedora, openSUSE, Mandriva and so on. Saying that, I like the continuity because it doesn't mean that my apple cart is going to get overthrown now and again. Indeed, you could say that the whole Linux distribution market has matured very nicely with evolution being the order of the day and I suppose that Ubuntu needs to be seen to be evolving more than perhaps it has been doing.

In summary, it's early days for Intrepid Ibex, yet it works well even at this stage. In fact, it is running sufficiently so that I am writing this very post in a Firefox session running on the thing.  It'll be interesting to see how it goes from here and if any more pleasant surprises are visited upon us. After the "safety first" approach of Hardy Heron, I suppose that Canonical can feel a little more adventurous, so we'll see what comes. Meanwhile, Here are a few screenshots below for your perusal:

An introduction to Wubi

The Toshiba laptop that I acquired at the start of the year is a Windows Vista box, and it isn't something with which I want to play too roughly because the OS came pre-installed on it. I still wish to continue to see how Vista goes at close quarters, so removing it to put Ubuntu or some other Linux distribution on there wasn't ever going to be an option that I was willing to take either. Neither was the option of setting up a dual booting arrangement using disk partitioning; I have plenty of experience of doing that to set up dual booting machines over the years, and I don't need any more than what I already have. So, I was happy to leave it as a Windows box and only as a Windows box.

That situation has changed, and the cause was Canonical's decision to go for something novel when it brought out Ubuntu 8.04. The premise is as follows: a Windows style installation that pops an entry in the Windows boot menu that allows you to fire up Ubuntu without ever having to do disk partitioning or other similar rough play. For those who are less than enamoured with the Linux option, it's even easy to remove too, as easy as any other Windows program in fact. Removal of Linux is very definitely not what I'd do, and that's even without the pain and upheaval of more customary means for setting dual booting machines. In these days of virtualisation and hypervisor technology, I have my ideas as to what has been used to give us that easy way in.

Being an Ubuntu user anyway, the possibility of having Ubuntu on the laptop and the interesting opportunity that Wubi offered for getting it on there was too tempting for me to give it a miss. A small download from the Wubi website is all that is needed to set things off. You get a number of options up front, like where to put the (large) file to be used to house the Ubuntu world and how large you might want it. Setting a username and password for the thing gets included among other items. The next stage is to download the files to be used to perform the installation. Once that is completed, and it took me a few goes to get the lot (thankfully, it stores things up to the point where the downloading operation cuts out so you didn't start from scratch each time; even so, it's still annoying and could put some off), it is time to restart the computer and boot into Ubuntu to complete the set-up of the operating system itself; it is at this point that the familiar very much returns. A reboot later, and you are into a world that does its level best to fool you into thinking that Windows is another universe and never existed on that machine at all.

So, a machine that seemed destined to only ever run Windows can run Linux now as well. Wubi comes across as a neat and clever way to get a dual booting computer, and I hope to leave mine as I now have it. No feathers were ruffled on the Windows side, and I saw no sign of any destruction. That makes Ubuntu's way of doing things a much better option than other distributions that make you go down more invasive routes when creating a dual booting PC. A question remains in my mind. Could this approach take off?

VMware Workstation in full screen mode hobbles my keyboard

Recently, I have encountered an odd situation following my recent upgrade to Ubuntu 8.04: when I use VMware Workstation to run Windows XP in full screen mode, the keyboard no longer acts as it should. For instance, the Caps Lock and Num Lock keys stop working, as does the Shift key. Logging out and back in again is the least that's needed to set things right, but there has to be a better way to resolve the problem. While I am not saying that it's limited to the scenario where I saw it happen, it's still very odd behaviour. If you have a solution, please let me know. Of course, I'll keep you posted if I find one. Meanwhile, I'll be avoiding full screen mode with VMware as much as I can.

Update 1:

I have done a spot of digging on this one since and gained the impression that there might be a conflict between VMware and the version of X.org Server that comes with Ubuntu. A restorative trick that I have seen suggested is to issue the following command in a terminal, replacing "gb" with your own locale, but I have yet to see if it works:

setxkbmap -rules xorg -layout "gb"

In any case, it looks as if it is not a permanent fix but just a way to keep working without resorting to system restarts, logging off and back on, etc.

Update 2:

I can now verify that the command quoted above works for me. Of course, it would better to find a permanent fix and even better for the behaviour never to occur at all. For now, though, any fix is better than none whatsoever.

Turning the world on its head: running VMware on Ubuntu

When Windows XP was my base operating system, I used VMware Workstation to peer into the worlds of Windows 2000, Solaris and various flavours of Linux, including Ubuntu. Now that I am using Ubuntu instead of what became a very flaky XP instance, VMware is still with me, which I am using it to keep a foot in the Windows universe. In fact, I have Windows 2000 and Windows XP virtual machines available to me that should supply my Windows needs.

An evaluation version of Workstation 6 is what I am using to power them and I must admit that I am likely to purchase a licence before the evaluation period expires. Installation turned out to be a relatively simple affair, starting with my downloading a compressed tarball from the VMware website. The next steps were to decompress the tarball (Ubuntu has an excellent tool, replete with a GUI, for this) and run vmware-install.pl. I didn't change any of the defaults and everything was set up without a bother.

In use, a few things have come to light. The first is that virtual machines must be stored on drives formatted with EXt3 or some other native Linux file system rather than on NTFS. Do the latter, and you get memory errors when you try starting a virtual machine; I know that I did and that every attempt resulted in failure. After a spot of backing up files, I converted one of my SATA drives from NTFS to Ext3. For sake of safety, I also mounted it as my home directory; the instructions on Ubuntu Unleashed turned out to be invaluable for this. I moved my Windows 2000 VM over and it worked perfectly.

Next on the list was a series of peculiar errors that cam to light when I was attempting to install Windows XP in a VM created for it. VMware was complaining about a CPU not being to run fast enough; 2 MHz was being stated for an Athlon 64 3000+ chip running at 1,58 GHz! Clearly, something was getting confused. Also, my XP installation came to a halt with a BSOD stating that a driver had gone into a loop, with Framebuf fingered as the suspect. I was seeing two symptoms of the same problem and its remedy was unclear. A message on a web forum put the idea of rebooting Ubuntu into my head, and that resolved the problem. For now, I'll be keeping an eye on it, though.

Otherwise, everything seems to be going well with this approach, and that's an encouraging sign. It looks as if my current Linux-based set up is one with which I am going to stay. This week has been an interesting one already, and I have no doubt that I'll continue to learn more as time goes on.