Technology Tales

Out of memory at line: 56

This is an error that I have started to see a lot in the last few weeks. First, it was with Piwik and latterly with WordPress.com Stats. For the record, I have never seen it on up-to-date systems but always with IE6 and at page unloading time. The CPU usage hits 100% before the error is produced, which had me blaming JavaScript in error. However, it isn't the cause of all ills.

In fact, the cause seems to be a bug in a certain release of Adobe Flash 9, but I reckon that the inclusion of certain features in a Flash movie are needed to trigger it too. While I don't have the exact details of this, WordPress.com Stats worked without fault until a recent update, so that is what is making me reach the conclusion that I have. That observation also makes me wonder whether we are coming to a point where Flash compatibility is something that needs to be factored into the use of the said technology in a website or web application. Updating Flash will solve the problem on the client, but it might be better if it wasn't triggered on the server side either.

64-bit Firefox plugins?

My laptop has both Windows Vista and Ubuntu on there, with WUBI being the facilitator of the peaceful coexistence. However, what I either forgot or never realised was that it was the 64-bit variant of Ubuntu 9.04 that has found its way onto the thing. For the most part, it works well, but there is one catch that I recently encountered: not every Firefox plugin or add-on is 64-bit compatible. Google Gears is one such example, yet other very useful and pervasive helpers have the same affliction: RealPlayer is one, and Adobe's Flash is another. Apparently, you can still download the 32-bit release versions and use nspluginwrapper to get them going. That worked for RealPlayer, but seemingly not for Flash; more investigation may be needed on that one. Other remedies like using 32-bit Firefox (if it runs, of course) or alpha versions of what Adobe offers can be tried too. It almost goes without saying that I'd wish that there was more awareness of the 64-bit Linux world, but I remain glad to have met this rough edge before taking the plunge with my main system.

Update 2014-01-24: It looks as if this problem has gone away now with the growth in maturity of 64-bit computing. Certainly, it does not rear its head on any 64-bit Linux distro that I have used or even Windows, apart perhaps from ensuring that you are using the right JRE for a browser (32-bit or 64-bit).

About Perl's Binding Operator

While this piece is as much an aide de memoire for myself as anything else, putting it here seems worthwhile if it answers questions for others. The binding operators, =~ or !~, come in handy when you are framing conditional statements in Perl using Regular Expressions, for example, testing whether x =~ /\d+/ or not. The =~ variant is also used for changing strings using the s/[pattern1]/[pattern2]/ regular expression construct (here, s stands for "substitute"). What has brought this to mind is that I wanted to ensure that something was done for strings that did not contain a certain pattern, and that's where the !~ binding operator came in useful; ^~ might have come to mind for some reason, but it wasn't what I needed.

A case of the reverse Midas touch?

Last week, a power outage put my main home PC out of action. While it may have been recoverable if that silly accident of a few weeks back hadn't happened, a troubled rebuild is progressing. Despite the challenges, I somehow manage to remain hopeful that an avenue of exploration will yield some fruit. Even so, thoughts of throwing in the towel and calling in professionals rather than throwing good money after bad are gathering. The saga is causing me to question the sense of self building in place of buying something ready built. Saying that, they can have their off days too.

Meanwhile, I have been displaced onto the spare desktop PC and the laptop. In other words, my home computing needs are being fulfilled to a point, though the feeling of frustrated displacement and partial disconnection from my data remains; because I have been able to extricate most of my digital photos and my web building, things are far from being hopeless. With every disappointment, there remains an opportunity or two. Since the spare desktop runs Debian, I have been spending some time seeing if I can bend that to my will, which can be done, sometimes after a fashion.

A few posts should result from this period, not least regarding working with Debian. On the subject of hardware, I will not elaborate until the matter comes to a more permanent resolution. From past attempts (all were successful in the end), I know that the business of PC building can feel like a dark art: you are left there wondering why none of your efforts summon a working system to life work until it all comes together in the blink of an eye leaving you to wonder why all the effort was expended. The best analogy that I can offer is awaiting a bus or train; it often seems that the waiting takes longer than the journey. Restoring my home computing to what it was before is a mere triviality compared to what some people have to suffer, but resolution of a problem always puts a spring in my step.

Old tricks can still save money

Recently, there was no sound coming out from my main PC and I began to suspect the sound card, an ageing Guillemot Maxi Sound Muse. Naturally, my thoughts turned to making an acquisition, only for those in stock at PC World seemed to have unknown or dubious Linux compatibility. However, I powered the machine down for the night and re-seated the card in its slot the following morning. That was enough to solve the problem and I retained my cash, never a bad thing and especially so in these times. It's always nice to know that and old trick still has its place.

Getting Fedora working in VirtualBox

After a hiatus induced by disk errors seen on start up, I have gone having a go with Fedora again. In the world of real PC's, its place has been taken by Debian, so virtualisation was brought into play for my most recent explorations. I could have gone with 10, the current stable version, but curiosity got the better of me and I downloaded a pre-release version of 11 instead.

On my way to getting that instated, I encountered two issues. The first of these was boot failure with the message like this:

FATAL: INT18: BOOT FAILURE

As it turned out, that was easily sorted. I was performing the installation from a DVD image mounted as if it were a real DVD, and laziness or some other similar reason had me rebooting with it still mounted. Though there is an option to load the hard disk variant, it wasn't happening, resulting in the message that's above. A complete shutdown and replacement of the virtual DVD with a real one set matters to rights.

The next trick was to get Guest Additions added, but Fedora's 2.6.29 was not what VirtualBox was expecting, and it demanded the same ransom as Debian: gcc, make and kernel header files. Unfamiliarity had me firing up Fedora's software installation software, only to find that Synaptic seems to beat it hands down in the search department. Turning to Google dredged up the following command to be executed, which got me further:

yum install binutils gcc make patch libgomp glibc-headers glibc-devel kernel-headers kernel-devel

However, the installed kernel headers didn't match the kernel, but a reboot fixed that once the kernel was updated. Then, the Guest Additions installed themselves as intended, with necessary compilations to match the installed kernel.

The procedures that I have described here would, it seems, work for Fedora 10; well, they certainly have bequeathed me a working system. I have had a little poke and a beta of Firefox 3.5 is included, and I saw sign of OpenOffice 3.1 too. So, it looks very cutting edge, easily so in comparison with Ubuntu and Debian. Apart from one or niggles, it seems to run smoothly too. Firstly, don't use the command shutdown -h now to close the thing down, or you'll cause VirtualBox to choke. Using the usual means ensures that all goes well, though. The other irritation is that it doesn't connect to the network without a poke from me. Whether SELinux is to blame for this or not, I cannot tell, but it might be something for consideration by the powers than be. That these are the sorts of things that I have noticed should be telling you that I have no major cause for complaint. While I have mulled over a move to Fedora in the past and that option remains as strong as ever, Ubuntu is not forcing me to look at an alternative and the fact that I know how to achieve what I need is resulting in inertia anyway.

Installing a Windows 7 release candidate and fixing concomitant Kaspersky errors

Now that the Release Candidate for Windows 7 is out, I have been giving it a whirl in a VirtualBox session and it, like the Beta that I had been trying too, feels a sold enough affair. I went for the complete installation route in place of the upgrade path. One surprise was that it bundled my old files into a single folder called Windows_old, and that my old user bits and bobs were folded in with this too. Even though there was nothing there that I wouldn't have missed, this still is a nice touch.

However, I have a spot of fixing to do after adding Kaspersky Internet Security 2009. Like the beta, mixing Windows 7 and Kaspersky seems not to be the way to a stable system. Whether this is down to the virtualisation aspect of the business is something that I don't know, but I have found that removing Kaspersky and replacing it made everything sing along together. Booting into Safe Mode and using msconfig to remove any incidences of Kaspersky being called at start up provides a partial restoration of service. Because the msiexec service isn't running, you need full mode before any software but pulling out any cause for execution of Kaspersky gets that back. While I suppose that I could go and put Windows 7 on a real machine to see if Kaspersky causes problems there, that's not a road that I really want to travel at this time.

Where's WordPress 2.8?

It now seems that WordPress 2.7 has been an unqualified success. The major changes that were made to the administration screens have been well received, and the grumblings that were extant about 2.5 and 2.6 seem to have dissipated too. Another observation is that security bugs have not been making their presence felt. All in all, it feels very much like assured progress and may explain why 2.8 has been taking its time in coming.

It's now pencilled in for the end of this month and looks as if it will be a polishing of what already works well. It seems to me that most of the changes are behind the scenes, but there is a new widgets interface that should be ever more user-friendly together with an automated theme installation and upgrade facility that is based on what is already in place for plugins (speaking of which, that interface has been tidied too). Another rough edge that has been removed is the whole business of time zones and daylight saving time. In summary, it seems to be a sharpening of a package that already works well anyway. I have been running it on another site without a whimper of drama, so that's probably saying something. Saying that, quite how they are going to get anyone to upgrade is another matter. For one thing, Lorelle VanFossen's overuse of the word "mandatory" cannot be likely to do it...

In a way, the subject of upgrade fatigue brings me to a recent poll run by Automattic's Jane Wells. Quite a number want to stick with what works, while others fancy a change. This split could be tricky to manage and might even encourage some not to upgrade at all and stick with what works for them. After all, there were two episodes of major upheaval last year and I cannot see everyone wishing to see that happen again. Continual evolutionary freshening would suit me better. Thankfully, any talk of changing the administration screens has been left for 2.9 now, and there's always the option of sticking with 2.8 if what is produced becomes a sufficient irritation. Well, it saves a leap to Habari or another alternative anyway...

Taming raw images with ImageMagick: A virtual workaround for Ubuntu 9.04

While using a command line tool like ImageMagick for image processing may sound a really counter-intuitive thing to do, there's no need to do everything on a case by case interactive basis. Image resizing and format conversion come to mind here. Helper programs are used behind the scenes too, with Ghostscript being used to create Postscript files, for example.

The subject of helper programs brings me to an issue that has hampered me recently. While I am aware that there are tools like F-Spot available, I am also wont to use a combination of shell scripting (BASH & KSH), Perl and ImageMagick for organising my digital photos. My preference for using Raw camera files (DNG & CRW) means that ImageMagick cannot access these without a little helper. In the case of Ubuntu, it's UFRaw. However, Jaunty Jackalope appears to have seen UFRaw updated to a version that is incompatible with the included version of ImageMagick (6.4.5 as opposed to 3.5.2 at the time of writing). The result is that the command issued by ImageMagick to UFRaw - issue the command man ufraw-batch to see the details - is not accepted by the included version of the latter, 0.15 if you're interested. It appears that an older release of UFRaw accepted the output device ppm16 (16-bit PPM files) but this should now be specified as ppm for the output device and 16 for the output depth. In a nutshell, where the parameter output-type did the lot, you now need both output-type and output-depth.

While I thought of decoupling things by using UFRaw to create 16-bit PPM files for processing by ImageMagick, it was to no avail. The identify command wouldn't return the date on which the image was taken. Though I even changed the type to 8-bit JPEG's with added EXIF information, no progress was made. In the end, a mad plan came to mind: creating a VirtualBox VM running Debian. The logic was that if Debian deserves its reputation for solidity, dependencies like ImageMagick and UFRaw shouldn't be broken, and I wasn't wrong. To make it work well, I needed to see if I could get Guest Additions installed on Debian. Out of the box, the supported kernel version must be at least 2.6.27 and Debian's is 2.6.26, so additional work was on the cards. First, GCC, Make and the correct kernel header files need to be installed. Once those are in place, the installation works smoothly and a restart sets the goodies in motion. To make the necessary shared folder to be available, a command like the following was executed:

mount -t vboxfs [Shared Folder name] [mount point]

Once that deed was done and ImageMagick instated, the processing that I have been doing for new DSLR images was reinstated. Ironically, Debian's version of ImageMagick, 6.3.7, is even older than Ubuntu's, but it works and that's the main thing. Since there is an Ubuntu bug report for this on Launchpad, I hope that it gets fixed at some point in the near future. However, that may mean awaiting 9.10 or Karmic Koala, so I'm glad to have this workaround for now.

Ubuntu 9.04 and Tracker

Shortly after it was released, I did the upgrade shuffle very painlessly, and it didn't take up so much time either. There was only one issue: Tracker falling over, complaining about corrupted indices. That got it removed from my system using apt-get remove (apt-get purge is another option, especially if you need to rid yourself of nefarious configuration files). After having a bit of a dig around the web, I found that I wasn't the only one seeing the problem. To me, it looks as if the upgrade to 9.04 doesn't work so well when it comes to Tracker, and it needs to be removed and reinstalled to ensure that all required dependencies are correctly set in place. Since I restored it on my system, all is working without complaint. Other than the Tracker issue, it has been a case of another uneventful upgrade. Though the evolutionary path that Ubuntu is following may disappoint anyone looking for excitement, no one would upgrade every six months if they knew that disruptive damage or upheaval might be caused. While I may do a clean installation at some point, that is well down the priority list right now.