TOPIC: WORDPRESS
Setting the PHP version in .htaccess on Apache web servers
The default PHP version on my outdoors, travel and photography website is 5.2.17 and that is getting on a bit now since it is no longer supported by the PHP project and has not been thus since 2011. One obvious impact was Piwik, which I use for web analytics and needs at least 5.3.2. Since WordPress 4.0 will not work without having 5.2.24 or later, that upgrade became implausible. Therefore, I contacted Webfusion's support team, and they showed me how to get to at least 5.3.3 and even as far as 5.5.9. The trick is the addition of a line of code to the .htaccess file (near the top was my choice) like one of the following:
PHP 5.3.x
AddHandler application/x-httpd-php53 .php
PHP 5.5.x
AddHandler application/x-httpd-php55 .php
When I got one of these in place, things started to look promising, but for a locked database due to my not watching how big it had got. Replacing it with two additional databases addressed the problem of losing write-access, though there was a little upheaval caused by this. Using PHP 5.5.9 meant that I spotted messages regarding the deprecation of the mysql_connect function, so that needed fixing too. Prefixing it with @ might have been a temporary fix while I sought a more permanent one. Thus, I opted for piggybacking off what WordPress uses; make use of MySQLi or PDO_MySQL are other options. Sorting the database issue meant that I saw the upgrade message for WordPress as well as a mix of plugins and themes, so all looked better, leaving me to be less concerned about losing security updates. Also, I am up to the latest version of Piwik too, and that's an even better way to be.
Setting up MySQL on Sabayon Linux
For quite a while now, I have offline web servers for doing a spot of tweaking and tinkering away from the gaze of web users that visit what I have on there. Therefore, one of the tests that I apply to any prospective main Linux distro is the ability to set up a web server on there. This is more straightforward for some than for others. For Ubuntu and Linux Mint, it is a matter of installing the required software and doing a small bit of configuration. My experience with Sabayon is that it needs a little more effort than this, so I am sharing it here for the installation of MySQL.
The first step is to install the software using the commands that you find below. The first pops the software onto the system while the second completes the set-up. The --basedir option is need with the latter because it won't find things without it. It specifies the base location on the system, and it's /usr in my case.
sudo equo install dev-db/mysql
sudo /usr/bin/mysql_install_db --basedir=/usr
With the above complete, it's time to start the database server and set the password for the root user. That's what the two following commands achieve. Once your root password is set, you can go about creating databases and adding other users using the MySQL command line
sudo /etc/init.d/mysql start
mysqladmin -u root password 'password'
The last step is to set the database server to start every time you start your Sabayon system. The first command adds an entry for MySQL to the default run level so that this happens. The purpose of the second command is to check that this happened before restarting your computer to discover if it really happens. This procedure also is necessary for having an Apache web server behave in the same way, so the commands are worth having and even may have a use for other services on your system. ProFTP is another that comes to mind, for instance.
sudo rc-update add mysql default
sudo rc-update show | grep mysql
Sorting out MySQL on Arch Linux
Seeing Arch Linux running so solidly in a VirtualBox virtual box has me contemplating whether I should have it installed on a real PC. Saying that, recent announcements regarding the implementation of GNOME 3 in Linux Mint have caught my interest, even if the idea of using a rolling distribution as my main home operating system still has a lot of appeal for me. Having an upheaval come my way every six months when a new version of Linux Mint is released is the main cause of that.
While remaining undecided, I continue to evaluate the idea of Arch Linux acting as my main OS for day-to-day home computing. Towards that end, I have set up a working web server instance on there using the usual combination of Apache, Perl, PHP and MySQL. Of these, it was MySQL that went the least smoothly of all because the daemon wouldn't start for me.
It was then that I started to turn to Google for inspiration, and a range of actions resulted that combined to give the result that I wanted. One problem was a lack of disk space caused by months of software upgrades. Since tools like it in other Linux distros allow you to clear some disk space of obsolete installation files, I decided to see if it was possible to do the same with pacman, the Arch Linux command line package manager. The following command, executed as root, cleared about 2 GB of cruft for me:
pacman -Sc
The S in the switch tells pacman to perform package database synchronization, while the c instructs it to clear its cache of obsolete packages. In fact, using the following command as root every time an update is performed both updates software and removes redundant or outmoded packages:
pacman -Syuc
So I don't forget the needful housekeeping, this will be what I use from this point forward, with y being the switch for a refresh and u triggering a system upgrade. It's nice to have everything happen together without too much effort.
To do the required debugging that led me to the above along with other things, I issued the following command:
mysqld_safe --datadir=/var/lib/mysql/ &
This starts up the MySQL daemon in safe mode if all is working properly, and it wasn't in my case. Nevertheless, it creates a useful log file called myhost.err in /var/lib/mysql/. This gave me the messages that allowed the debugging of what was happening. It led me to installing net-tools and inettools using pacman; it was the latter of these that put hostname on my system and got the MySQL server startup a little further along. Other actions included unlocking the ibdata1 data file and removing the ib_logfile0 and ib_logfile1 files to gain something of a clean sheet. The kill command was used to shut down any lingering mysqld sessions too. To ensure that the ibdata1 file was unlocked, I executed the following commands:
mv ibdata1 ibdata1.bad
cp -a ibdata1.bad ibdata1
These renamed the original and then crafted a new duplicate of it, with the -a switch on the cp command forcing copying with greater integrity than normal. Along with the various file operations, I also created a link to my.cnf, the MySQL configuration file on Linux systems, in /etc using the following command executed by root:
ln -s /etc/mysql/ my.cnf /etc/my.cnf
While I am unsure if this made a real difference, uncommenting the lines in the same file that pertained to InnoDB tables. What directed me to these were complaints from mysqld_safe in the myhost.err log file. All I did was to uncomment the lines beginning with innodb and these were 116-118, 121-122 and 124-127 in my configuration file, but it may be different in yours.
After all the above, the MySQL daemon ran happily and, more importantly, started when I rebooted the virtual machine. Thinking about it now, I believe that it was a lack of disk space, the locking of a data file and the lack of InnoDB support that was stopping the MySQL service from running. Running commands like mysqld start weren't yielding useful messages, so a lot of digging was needed to get the result that I needed. In fact, that's one of the reasons why I am sharing my experiences here.
In the end, creating databases and loading them with data were all that was needed for me to start to see functioning websites on my (virtual) Arch Linux system. It turned out to be another step on the way to making it workable as a potential replacement for the Linux distributions that I use most often (Linux Mint, Fedora and Ubuntu).
Changing to CKEditor from FCKEditor for WordPress Content Editing
The post editor that I have been using on my WordPress-powered outdoors blog has not been TinyMCE but FCKEditor. My use of that editor has meant that WordPress' autosave and word counting features have not been available to me. As strange as it may sound to some, that is my choice. Even so, there have been times when I have missed the autosaving functionality and lost work.
Since FCKEditor has been replaced by CKEditor, there are plugins available for adding that editor to WordPress' administration interface. Recently, I replaced the old FCKEditor plugin with a newer CKEditor one, which has gained me post or page autosaving. Though the more cosmetic word counting feature is not active until a draft is manually saved, I can live with that.
Other than that, the interface remains familiar with all (X)HTML tags shown in the source code view without any being hidden away from view like on WordPress' implementation of TinyMCE. That isn't to see that WordPress is doing something wrong, only that there are alternative ways of doing things, that are equally valid. After all, why would there be choices if there only ever was one right way to do anything?
Like any WordPress plugins, those replacing the default content editor on WordPress can be vulnerable to changes in the publishing platform, and there is one of those in the pipeline for 3.2: a minimalist post/page editor that is billed as being non-distracting. That planned new feature is drawing inspiration from the likes of QuietWrite, where you can write content and transfer it over to WordPress or leave it where it was written.
Even with substantial changes like this, my experience never has been that design decisions made for new WordPress releases have restricted to any great extent how I use the thing. That's not to say that my usage hasn't changed over time, yet I have felt that any decisions were mine to make and not all made for me. In that light, I can foresee CKEditor continuing to work on WordPress 3.2 along with some testing ahead of time to be sure that is the case.
Turning off the admin bar in WordPress 3.1
Work on WordPress 3.1 is in full swing at the moment, though I initially thought that they were taking a little break after 3.0. From what I can see, many refinements are being made to the multi-blog functionality and behind-the-scenes work is ongoing on the administration screens too.
Another under-the-bonnet change has been to make WordPress less tied to MySQL, since the possibility of dropping in support for an alternative such as PostgreSQL is now a reality even if it isn't part of the default package. For now, it looks as if this will be plugin territory rather than default multi-database support, though that may become a sensible development in the light of Oracle's acquisition of MySQL and its sabre-rattling regarding Java patents. So far, the change to WordPress has affected my use of its database engine to power an offline version of my online photo gallery, but a quick spot of code editing sorted that issue.
One more obvious alteration will be the addition of a WordPress.com style administration bar to the top of all content and administration screens for a user who is logged into the system. Though it will be turned on by default, there will be the option of turning it off for those among who prefer things that way. All that will be needed for this is to add the following line near the top of wp-config.php:
define( "WP_SHOW_ADMIN_BAR", false);
The chance to see new additions like those above and be ready for is my main reason for following WordPress development. It's best to be ready instead of being surprised, though it has to be said that the blogging or CMS platform is a very polished one these days.
Basic string searching in MySQL table columns
Last weekend, I ended up doing a spot of file structure reorganisation on the web server for my Assorted Explorations website and needed to correct some file pointers in entries on my outdoors blog. Rather than grabbing a plugin from somewhere, I decided to edit the posts table directly. First, I needed to select the affected observations and this is where I had to pick out the affected rows and edit them in MySQL Query Browser. To accomplish that, I needed basic string searching, so I opened up my MySQL e-book from Apress and constructed something like the following:
select * from posts_table where post_text like '%some_text%';
The % wildcard characters are required to pick out a search string in any part of a piece of text. There may be a more sophisticated method, but this did what I needed in a quick and dirty manner without further ado. Well, it was what I needed.
Removing a column from a MySQL data table
My trying out WordPress 3.0 in advance of its final release has brought me errors on the management page for website links. After a spot of poking around the TRAC, I found that the bug already has been reported and that the cause is an extraneous column in the *_links table called link_category. The change in taxonomy handling over the years seems to have made it redundant, so I removed the said column from the database using a command like the following from both the MySQL command line and MySQL Query Browser:
alter table database.wp_links drop link_category;
That seems to have made those errors go away, and I hope that their upgrade code takes care of this before WordPress 3.0 is let loose of the general blogging public. Taking out the coding brittleness would do too.
Easier to print?
One matter that really came to light was how well or not the pages on here and on my hill walking and photography website came out on the printed page. After spotting a WordPress Codex article and with an eye on improving things, I have made a distinction between screen and print stylesheets. The code in the XHTML looks like this:
<link rel="stylesheet" href="/style.css" type="text/css" media="screen" />
<link rel="stylesheet" href="/style_print.css" type="text/css" media="print" />
The media attribute seems to be respected by the browsers that I have been using for testing (latest versions of Firefox, MSIE and Opera) so it then was a matter of using CSS to control what was shown and how it was displayed. Extraneous items like sidebars were excluded from the printed page in favour of the real content that visitors would be wanting anyway, and everything else was made as monochrome as possible, with images being the only things to escape. After all, people don't want to be wasting paper and ink in these cash strained times, and there's no need to have any more colour than necessary either. Then, there's the distraction caused by non-functioning hyperlinks that has inspired the sharing of some wisdom on A List Apart. Returning to my implementation, please let me know in the comments what you think of what I have done on here and if there remains any room for improvement.
Another look at Drupal for hosting a standalone website
Early in the first year of this blog, I got to investigate the use of Drupal for creating an article-based subsite. In the end, the complexities of its HTML and CSS thwarted my attempts to harmonise the appearance of web pages with other parts of the same site, and I discontinued my efforts. In the end, it was Textpattern that suited my needs, and I have stuck with that for the aforementioned subsite.
However, I recently spotted someone very obviously using Drupal in its out of the box state for a sort of blog (there is even an extension for importing WXR files containing content from a WordPress blog); they even hadn't removed the Drupal logo. With my interest rekindled, I took another look for the sake of seeing where things have gone in the last few years. Well, first impressions are that it now looks more like a blogging tool, with greater menu control and the facility to define custom content types.
There are plenty of nice themes around too, though that highlights an idiosyncrasy in the sense that content editing is not fully integrated into the administration area where I'd expect it to be. The consequence of this situation is that pages, posts (or story as the content type is called) or any content types that you have defined yourself are created and edited with the front page theme controlling the appearance of the user interface.
It is made even more striking when you use a different theme for the administration screens. That oddity aside, there is a lot to recommend Drupal, even if I'd try setting up a standalone site with it rather than attempting to shoehorn it as a part of an existing one like what I was trying when I last looked.
Further securing MySQL in Fedora
Ubuntu users must be spoilt because any MySQL installation asks you for a root password, an excellent thing in my opinion. With Fedora, it just pops the thing on there with you needing to set up a service and setting the root password yourself; if I recall correctly, I think that openSUSE does the same thing. For the service management, I needed to grab system-config-services from the repositories because my Live CD installation left off a lot of stuff, OpenOffice and GIMP even. The following command line recipe addressed the service manager omission:
su - # Change to root, entering password when asked
yum -y install system-config-services # Installs the thing without a yes/no prompt
exit # Return to normal user shell
Thereafter, the Services item from the menus at System > Administration was pressed into service and the MySQL service enabled and started. The next step was to lock down the root user, so the following sequence was used:
mysql # Enter MySQL prompt; no need for user or password because it still is unsecured!
UPDATE mysql.user SET Password=PASSWORD('MyNewPass') WHERE User='root';
FLUSH PRIVILEGES;
quit # Exit the mysql prompt, leaving the bare mysql command unusable
For those occasions when password problems keep you out of the MySQL shell, you'll find password resetting advice on the MySQL website, though I didn't need to go the whole hog here. MySQL Administrator might be another option for this type of thing. That thought never struck me while I was using it to set up less privileged users and allowing them access to the system. For a while, I was well stymied in my attempts to access the MySQL using any of those extra accounts until I got the idea of associating them with a host, another thing that is not needed on Ubuntu if my experience is any guide. All in all, Fedora may make you work a little extra to get things like thing done, yet I am not complaining if it makes you understand a little more about what is going on in the background, something that is never a disadvantage.