TOPIC: PYTHON
Python productivity: Building better code through design, performance and scale
12th September 2025Python's success in data science and beyond stems from more than just readable syntax. It represents a coherent philosophy where errors guide development, explicitness prevents bugs, modern tooling enforces quality, performance comes from purpose-built engines, and scaling extends rather than replaces familiar patterns. Understanding these principles transforms everyday coding from a series of individual tasks into a systematic approach to building robust, maintainable and efficient systems.
Error-Driven Development as a Design Philosophy
Python treats errors not as failures, but as design features that surface problems early and prevent subtle defects later. The language embodies an "easier to ask forgiveness than permission" philosophy, attempting operations first and objecting meaningfully when they cannot proceed.
Consider how Python handles basic operations. A SyntaxError appears immediately when code violates grammatical rules: if True print("hello") triggers an immediate complaint with a caret pointing to the problematic location. Python neither guesses intentions nor continues with broken syntax because this guarantee of clear structure keeps code understandable across projects and platforms.
Sequence operations demonstrate similar principles. When code attempts to access lst[5] on a three-element list, Python raises IndexError: list index out of range rather than silently padding or expanding the sequence. This deliberate failure prevents hidden logic errors in loops and aggregations by forcing explicit checks of assumptions about data size.
Dictionary lookups follow the same pattern. Accessing a non-existent key with d['missing'] yields KeyError: 'missing' rather than inventing placeholder values. This explicit failure catches typos and unclear control flow whilst enabling defensive programming patterns through try/except blocks.
Name resolution errors like NameError and UnboundLocalError enforce clear scoping rules without creating variables accidentally or resolving names to unexpected contexts. Type discipline appears at runtime through TypeError for incorrect argument types and ValueError for correct types with inappropriate values. Each error message identifies which contract has been violated, directing fixes to either the object passed or the value it contains.
Assertions provide a final layer of optional verification. The assert statement allows code to state assumptions explicitly, failing with meaningful messages when invariants do not hold. This narrows the search space for defects by making expectations visible and providing immediate context for failures.
Taking these error signals seriously nudges development towards explicitness and clarity, establishing a foundation for all subsequent quality improvements.
Explicitness Over Implicitness
Making intentions clear through code structure prevents ambiguity, aids tooling and simplifies reuse. This principle manifests across multiple areas of Python development, from data structures to function signatures.
Raw dictionaries offer flexibility but create fragility. A typo in a key or missing field becomes a runtime KeyError with no contract about required contents. Using @dataclass to define structured objects like User with id, email, full_name, status and optional last_login provides clear interfaces with minimal overhead. Type hints and IDE support make attribute access unambiguous, whilst construction fails early when required fields are absent.
For cases requiring validation, pydantic models build on this foundation. An email field declared as EmailStr automatically validates format, while custom validators can restrict status values to specific options such as 'active', 'inactive' or 'pending'. The resulting models are self-documenting and shield downstream code from invalid data.
Function parameters representing closed sets of options benefit from similar treatment. Plain strings invite typos and lack autocomplete support. Defining enums such as OrderStatus with PENDING, SHIPPED and DELIVERED makes possible states explicit whilst helping both developers and tools. Passing OrderStatus.SHIPPED to process_order reveals intention clearly and enables straightforward comparisons against enum members.
Function signatures become clearer through keyword-only arguments, enforced with a bare star in definitions. A function like create_user(name, email, *, admin=False, notify=True, temporary=False) forces call sites to write create_user(..., admin=True, notify=False) rather than passing sequences of ambiguous boolean values. The resulting calls read almost as documentation.
File path operations improve through object-oriented design. The pathlib module treats paths as objects where joining uses natural / syntax, directory creation uses mkdir, suffix changes use with_suffix, and text operations use read_text and write_text. Code becomes shorter, more portable and less prone to string manipulation errors.
These patterns consistently replace implicit assumptions with explicit contracts, making code intention more visible and reducing the cognitive load of understanding system behaviour.
Structural Code Quality Through Tooling and Patterns
Sustainable code quality emerges from systematic approaches to organisation, testing and maintenance rather than individual discipline alone. Several key patterns and tools work together to create robust, readable codebases.
Control flow benefits from handling error conditions early rather than nesting deeply. Guard clauses invert the traditional structure so that invalid states return immediately, whilst main logic remains non-indented when preconditions are met. A process_payment function checking order.is_valid, then user.has_payment_method, then available funds before performing charges reads linearly. Exceptions during processing are caught precisely, errors logged with context, and functions return deterministically.
Even beloved list comprehensions have limits. When filtering and transformation logic become complex, sprawling comprehensions become opaque. Extracting predicates into named functions like is_valid_premium_user restores readability by giving conditions clear names. Where multiple checks and transformations are needed, conventional loops with early continue statements may prove more straightforward and debuggable.
Pure functions that accept all inputs as parameters and return results without changing external state simplify testing and reuse. Moving from designs where functions mutate global totals and read from global inventories to approaches where calculations accept prices, quantities and discounts as inputs removes hidden coupling. This enables deterministic testing of edge cases and reasoning about code without tracking changing state.
Documentation ties these practices together. Docstrings explaining what functions do, parameters they accept, values they return and including examples make codebases self-explanatory. Combined with tooling, docstrings serve as both reference and executable documentation.
Automation enforces consistency where human attention falters. Formatters like Black, linters like Ruff, static type checkers like mypy and import organisers like isort can run before each commit using pre-commit. Style issues and common mistakes are caught automatically, freeing mental capacity for higher-level concerns.
When handling errors, resist blanket except: statements that swallow everything from syntax errors to keyboard interrupts. Be specific where possible, catching ConnectionError, ValueError or database errors and handling each appropriately. When catch-alls are necessary, prefer except Exception as e: and log full tracebacks so that unexpected failures remain visible and traceable.
Performance Through Modern Engines
Once code achieves cleanliness and robustness, performance becomes the next frontier. Traditional tools often leave substantial speed gains on the table, particularly for data-intensive work where single-threaded processing creates bottlenecks on modern hardware.
Polars, a DataFrame library written in Rust, addresses these limitations by making parallelism the default whilst providing both eager and lazy execution modes. Benchmarks on datasets of around 580,000 rows show Polars completing filtering roughly four times faster than Pandas, aggregation over twenty times faster, groupby operations eight times faster, sorting three times faster, and feature engineering five times faster. These gains stem from fundamental architectural differences rather than incremental optimisations.
The performance improvement requires a shift in mental model. Instead of writing sequential operations that execute immediately, you can batch expressions and let Polars parallelise them automatically. Creating both profit and margin with one with_columns call signals that these calculations can proceed together. Lazy evaluation extends this approach further. Building pipelines with pl.scan_csv('large_file.csv').filter(...).group_by(...).agg(...).collect() lets Polars construct query plans, then optimises them before execution. Filters are pushed down so less data reaches later stages, only selected columns are read, and compatible operations are combined.
Expressiveness comes from an expression system applying operations across columns succinctly. Where Pandas encourages thinking in terms of single columns assigned individually, Polars supports expressions like pl.col(['revenue', 'cost']) * 1.1 applied to multiple columns simultaneously. Familiar transformations translate directly: pl.read_csv('sales.csv') replaces pd.read_csv, selection and filtering become df.filter(pl.col('order_value') > 500).select(['customer_id', 'order_value']), new columns are created with df.with_columns(((pl.col('revenue') - pl.col('cost')) / pl.col('revenue')).alias('profit_margin')), and operations utilise all available cores automatically.
Memory efficiency improves through Apache Arrow's columnar format, storing data more compactly and avoiding NumPy-based overhead. CSV files of around 2 GB requiring roughly 10 GB of RAM in Pandas often process in approximately 4 GB with Polars. This difference can determine whether workflows run smoothly on laptops or require chunking strategies.
Scaling Beyond Single Processes
When single processes reach their limits, two prominent approaches help scale Python across cores and machines whilst preserving familiar patterns and mental models.
Dask extends NumPy, Pandas and scikit-learn idioms to larger-than-memory datasets by partitioning arrays, DataFrames and computations then scheduling them in parallel. Its primary abstractions are dask.dataframe and dask.array, along with delayed task graphs. It excels for scalable batch processing, feature engineering and out-of-core work where the mental model remains close to the PyData stack. Integration with scikit-learn and XGBoost is mature, work-stealing schedulers are sophisticated, and detailed dashboards provide visibility. Clusters can be managed natively or through systems like Kubernetes and YARN.
For large-scale data cleaning and feature engineering, Dask provides natural extensions. Reading many CSV files from storage with dd.read_csv('s3://data/large-dataset-*.csv'), filtering rows with df[df['amount'] > 100], applying transformations per partition, then writing Parquet with df.to_parquet('s3://processed/output/') looks like Pandas but runs in parallel and out of core. Array computations through dask.array handle chunked operations so that x.mean(axis=0).compute() runs across partitions without exhausting memory.
Ray takes a more general approach to distributed computing through remote functions and actors. It suits workloads with many independent Python functions, stateful services and complex machine learning pipelines. A growing ecosystem includes Ray Tune for hyperparameter optimisation, Ray Train for multi-GPU training, Ray Serve for model serving, and RLlib for reinforcement learning. Scheduling is dynamic and actor-based, cluster management integrates with cloud providers, and scalability handles applications requiring control and flexibility.
For model training requiring many configuration explorations, Ray Tune provides schedulers and search strategies. Training functions can be wrapped and launched across workers with tune.run, with methods like ASHA stopping unpromising runs early. Integration with popular libraries means scaling experiments requires minimal code changes. Ray Serve turns model classes exposing __call__ methods into scalable services with @serve.deployment and serve.run, handling routing and scaling automatically.
Incremental Adoption and Pragmatic Choices
The most sustainable approach to improving Python productivity involves gradual implementation rather than wholesale changes. Each improvement builds on previous ones, creating compound benefits over time whilst minimising disruption to existing workflows.
Adopting Polars illustrates this principle well. The first step can be simply loading data with pl.read_csv('big_file.csv') for faster I/O, then converting to Pandas with .to_pandas() if the rest of the pipeline expects Pandas objects. As comfort grows, expression-oriented patterns yield dividends: filtering then adding multiple columns in single chained calls, so Polars can optimise across steps. Full benefits appear when entire pipelines are expressed lazily, but this transition can happen gradually as understanding deepens.
Similarly, clean code practices can be introduced incrementally. Start by letting error messages guide fixes rather than suppressing them. Refactor one fragile dictionary into a dataclass when maintenance becomes painful. Extract a complex list comprehension into a named function when debugging becomes difficult. Each change teaches principles that apply more broadly whilst delivering immediate benefits.
Scaling decisions are often pragmatic rather than theoretical. If work centres on DataFrames and arrays with minimal conceptual shift from Pandas or NumPy, Dask likely delivers what you need. If workloads mix training, tuning and serving or require orchestrating many concurrent Python tasks with fine-grained control, Ray's abstractions and libraries provide better matches. Trying each approach on representative workflow slices quickly clarifies which will serve best.
The choice between tools should be driven by actual requirements rather than perceived sophistication. A single machine with Polars may outperform a small cluster running Pandas. A well-structured monolithic application may be more maintainable than a prematurely distributed system. The key is understanding when complexity serves genuine needs rather than adding overhead.
Synthesis: The Compound Nature of Python Productivity
These themes work together rather than in isolation. Error-driven development creates habits that surface problems early. Explicit code structures make intentions clear to both humans and tools. Quality practices through tooling and patterns create sustainable foundations. Modern engines provide performance without sacrificing readability. Scaling approaches extend familiar patterns rather than replacing them. Incremental adoption ensures changes compound rather than disrupt.
The result is a coherent approach to Python development where each improvement reinforces others. Explicit data structures work better with static type checkers. Pure functions are easier to test and parallelise. Clean error handling integrates naturally with distributed systems. Modern DataFrame engines benefit from lazy evaluation patterns that also improve code clarity.
This synthesis explains Python's enduring appeal in data science and beyond. The language welcomes beginners with approachable syntax, whilst scaling to demanding production work without losing clarity. The ecosystem encourages practices that speed up teams over time rather than optimising for immediate gratification. The same principles that guide small scripts apply to large systems, creating a path for continuous improvement rather than periodic rewrites.
Start small: let error messages guide one fix, refactor one fragile dictionary into a dataclass, switch one slow operation to Polars, or run one hyperparameter sweep with Ray Tune. The improvements compound, and the foundations established early enable sophisticated capabilities later without fundamental changes to approach or mindset.
PandasGUI: A simple solution for Pandas DataFrame inspection from within VSCode
2nd September 2025One of the things that I miss about Spyder when running Python scripts is the ability to look at DataFrames easily. Recently, I was checking a VAT return only for tmux to truncate how much of the DataFrame I could see in output from the print function. While closing tmux might have been an idea, I sought the DataFrame windowing alternative. That led me to the pandasgui package, which did exactly what I needed, apart from pausing the script execution to show me the data. The installed was done using pip:
pip install pandasgui
Once that competed, I could use the following code construct to accomplish what I wanted:
import pandasgui
pandasgui.show(df)
In my case, there were several lines between the two lines above. Nevertheless, the first line made the pandasgui package available to the script, while the second one displayed the DataFrame in a GUI with scrollbars and cells, among other things. That was close enough to what I wanted to leave me able to complete the task that was needed of me.
Fixing Python path issues after Homebrew updates on Linux Mint
30th August 2025With Python available by default, it is worth asking how the version on my main Linux workstation is made available courtesy of Homebrew. All that I suggest is that it either was needed by something else or I fancied having a newer version that was available through the Linux Mint repos. Regardless of the now vague reason for doing so, it meant that I had some work to do after running the following command to update and upgrade all my Homebrew packages:
brew update; brew upgrade
The first result was this message when I tried running a Python script afterwards:
-bash: /home/linuxbrew/.linuxbrew/bin/python3: No such file or directory
The solution was to issue the following command to re-link Python:
brew link --overwrite python@3.13
Since you may have a different version by the time that you read this, just change 3.13 above to whatever you have on your system. All was not quite sorted for me after that, though.
My next task was to make Pylance look in the right place for Python packages because they had been moved too. Initial inquiries were suggesting complex if robust solutions. Instead, I went for a simpler fix. The first step was to navigate to File > Preferences > Settings in the menus. Then, I sought out the Open Settings (JSON) icon in the top right of the interface and clicked on it to open a JSON containing VSCode settings. Once in there, I edited the file to end up with something like this:
"python.analysis.extraPaths": [
"/home/[account name]/.local/bin",
"/home/[account name]/.local/lib/python[python version]/site-packages"
]Clearly, your [account name] and [python version] need to be filled in above. That approach works for me so far, leaving the more complex alternative for later should I come to need that.
Claude Projects: Reusing your favourite AI prompts
28th March 2025Some things that I do with Anthropic Claude, I end up repeating. Generating titles for pieces of text or rewriting text to make it read better are activities that happen a lot. Others would include the generation of single word previews for a piece or creating a summary.
Python or R scripts come in handy for summarisation, either for a social media post or for introduction into other content. In fact, this is how I go much of the time. Nevertheless, I found another option: using Projects in the Claude web interface.
These allow you to store a prompt that you reuse a lot in the Project Knowledge panel. Otherwise, you need to supply a title and a description too. Once completed, you just add your text in there for the AI to do the rest. Title generation and text rewriting already are set up like this, and keywords could follow. It is a great way to reuse and refine prompts that you use a lot.
Dealing with this Python error message on Windows: UnicodeEncodeError: 'charmap' codec can't encode characters in position 56-57: character maps to <undefined>
14th March 2025Recently, I got caught out by the above message when summarising some text using Python and Open AI's API while working within VS Code. There was no problem on Linux or macOS, but it was triggered on the Windows command line from within VS Code. Unlike the Julia or R REPL's, everything in Python gets executed in the console like this:
& "C:/Program Files/Python313/python.exe" script.py
The Windows command line shell operated with cp1252 character encoding, and that was tripping up the code like the following:
with open("out.txt", "w") as file:
file.write(new_text)The cure was to specify the encoding of the output text as utf-8:
with open("out.txt", "w", encoding='utf-8') as file:
file.write(new_text)After that, all was well and text was written to a file like in the other operating systems. One other thing to note is that the use of backslashes in file paths is another gotcha. Adding an r before the quotes gets around this to escape the contents, like using double backslashes. Using forward slashes is another option.
with open(r"c:\temp\out.txt", "w", encoding='utf-8') as file:
file.write(new_text)Getting Pylance to recognise locally installed packages in VSCode running on Linux Mint
17th December 2024When using VSCode on Linux Mint, I noticed that it was not finding any Python package installed into my user area, as is my usual way of working. Thus, it was being highlighted as being missing when it was already there.
The solution was to navigate to File > Preferences > Settings and click on the Open Settings (JSON) icon in the top right-hand corner of the app to add something like the following snippet in there.
"python.analysis.extraPaths": [
"/home/[user]/.local/bin"
]
Once you have added your user account to the above, saving the file is the next step. Then, VSCode needs a restart to pick up the new location. After that, the false positives get eliminated.
What to do an error appears when using pip to install Python packages on Linux Mint 22
16th December 2024After upgrading to Linux Mint 22, the following message appeared when attempting to install Python packages using the pip command:
error: externally-managed-environment
× This environment is externally managed
╰─> To install Python packages system-wide, try apt install
python3-xyz, where xyz is the package you are trying to
install.
If you wish to install a non-Debian-packaged Python package,
create a virtual environment using python3 -m venv path/to/venv.
Then use path/to/venv/bin/python and path/to/venv/bin/pip. Make
sure you have python3-full installed.
If you wish to install a non-Debian packaged Python application,
it may be easiest to use pipx install xyz, which will manage a
virtual environment for you. Make sure you have pipx installed.
See /usr/share/doc/python3.12/README.venv for more information.
note: If you believe this is a mistake, please contact your Python installation or OS distribution provider. You can override this, at the risk of breaking your Python installation or OS, by passing --break-system-packages.
hint: See PEP 668 for the detailed specification.
This will frustrate anyone following how-tos on the web, so users will need to know about it. On something like Linux Mint, the repositories may not be as up-to-date as PyPI, so picking up the very latest version has its advantages. Thus, I initially used the unrecommended --break-system-packages switch to get things going as before, since doing never broke anything before. While the way of working feels like an overkill in some ways, using pipx probably is the way forward as long as things work as I want them to do.
There is wisdom in using virtual environments too, especially when AI models are involved. For most of what I get to do, that may be getting too elaborate. Then, deleting or renaming the message file in /usr/lib/python3.12/EXTERNALLY-MANAGED is tempting if that gets around things, as retrograde as that probably is. After all, I never broke anything before this message started to appear, possibly since my interests are data related.
AttributeError: module 'PIL' has no attribute 'Image'
11th March 2024One of my websites has an online photo gallery. This has been a long-term activity that has taken several forms over the years. Once HTML and JavaScript based, it then was powered by Perl before PHP and MySQL came along to take things from there.
While that remains how it works, the publishing side of things has used its own selection of mechanisms over the same time span. Perl and XML were the backbone until Python and Markdown took over. There was a time when ImageMagick and GraphicsMagick handled image processing, but Python now does that as well.
That was when the error message gracing the title of this post came to my notice. Everything was working well when executed in Spyder, but the message appears when I tried running things using Python on the command line. PIL is the abbreviated name for the Python 3 pillow package; there was one called PIL in the Python 2 days.
For me, pillow loads, resizes and creates new images, which is handy for adding borders and copyright/source information to each image as well as creating thumbnails. All this happens in memory and that makes everything go quickly, much faster than disk-based tools like ImageMagick and GraphicsMagick.
Of course, nothing is going to happen if the package cannot be loaded, and that is what the error message is about. Linux is what I mainly use, so that is the context for this scenario. What I was doing was something like the following in the Python script:
import PIL
Then, I referred to PIL.Image when I needed it, and this could not be found when the script was run from the command line (BASH). The solution was to add something like the following:
from PIL import Image
That sorted it, and I must have run into trouble with PIL.ImageFilter too, since I now load it in the same manner. In both cases, I could just refer to Image or ImageFilter as I required and without the dot syntax. However, you need to make sure that there is no clash with anything in another loaded Python package when doing this.
Resolving a clash between Homebrew and Python
22nd November 2022For reasons that I cannot recall now, I installed the Hugo static website generator on my Linux system and web servers using Homebrew. The only reason that I suggest is that it might have been a way to get the latest version at the time because Linux Mint only does major changes like that every two years, keeping it in line with long-term support editions of Ubuntu.
When Homebrew was installed, it changed the lookup path for command line executables by adding the following line to my .bashrc file:
eval "$(/home/linuxbrew/.linuxbrew/bin/brew shellenv)"
This executed the following lines:
export HOMEBREW_PREFIX="/home/linuxbrew/.linuxbrew";
export HOMEBREW_CELLAR="/home/linuxbrew/.linuxbrew/Cellar";
export HOMEBREW_REPOSITORY="/home/linuxbrew/.linuxbrew/Homebrew";
export PATH="/home/linuxbrew/.linuxbrew/bin:/home/linuxbrew/.linuxbrew/sbin${PATH+:$PATH}";
export MANPATH="/home/linuxbrew/.linuxbrew/share/man${MANPATH+:$MANPATH}:";
export INFOPATH="/home/linuxbrew/.linuxbrew/share/info:${INFOPATH:-}";
While the result suits Homebrew, it changed the setup of Python and its packages on my system. Eventually, this had undesirable consequences, like messing up how Spyder started, so I wanted to change this. There are other things that I have automated using Python and these were not working either.
One way that I have seen suggested is to execute the following command, but I cannot vouch for this:
brew unlink python
What I did was to comment out the offending line in .bashrc and replace it with the following:
export PATH="$PATH:/home/linuxbrew/.linuxbrew/bin:/home/linuxbrew/.linuxbrew/sbin"
export HOMEBREW_PREFIX="/home/linuxbrew/.linuxbrew";
export HOMEBREW_CELLAR="/home/linuxbrew/.linuxbrew/Cellar";
export HOMEBREW_REPOSITORY="/home/linuxbrew/.linuxbrew/Homebrew";
export MANPATH="/home/linuxbrew/.linuxbrew/share/man${MANPATH+:$MANPATH}:";
export INFOPATH="${INFOPATH:-}/home/linuxbrew/.linuxbrew/share/info";
The first command adds Homebrew paths to the end of the PATH variable rather than the beginning, which was the previous arrangement. This ensures system folders are searched for executable files before Homebrew folders. It also means Python packages load from my user area instead of the Homebrew location, which happened under Homebrew's default configuration. When working with Python packages, remember not to install one version at the system level and another in your user area, as this creates conflicts.
So far, the result of the Homebrew changes is not unsatisfactory, and I will watch for any rough edges that need addressing. If something comes up, then I will set things up in another way.
A look at the Julia programming language
19th November 2022Several open-source computing languages get mentioned when talking about working with data. Among these are R and Python, but there are others; Julia is another one of these. It took a while before I got to check out Julia because I felt the need to get acquainted with R and Python beforehand. There are others like Lua to investigate too, but that can wait for now.
With the way that R is making an incursion into clinical data reporting analysis following the passage of decades when SAS was predominant, my explorations of Julia are inspired by a certain contrariness on my part. Alongside some small personal projects, there has been some reading in (digital) book form and online. Concerning the latter of these, there are useful tutorials like Introduction to Data Science: Learn Julia Programming, Maths & Data Science from Scratch or Julia Programming: a Hands-on Tutorial. Like what happens with R, there are online versions of published books available free of charge, and they include Julia Data Science and Interactive Visualization and Plotting with Julia. Video learning can help too and Jane Herriman has recorded and shared useful beginner's guides on YouTube that start with the basics before heading onto more advanced subjects like multiple dispatch, broadcasting and metaprogramming.
This piece of learning has been made of simple self-inspired puzzles before moving on to anything more complex. That differs from my dalliance with R and Python, where I ventured into complexity first, not least because of testing them out with public COVID data. Eventually, I got around to doing that with Julia too, though my interest was beginning to wane by then, and Julia's abilities for creating multipage PDF files were such that the PDF Toolkit was needed to help with this. Along the way, I have made use of such packages as CSV.jl, DataFrames.jl, DataFramesMeta, Plots, Gadfly.jl, XLSX.jl and JSON3.jl, among others. After that, there is PrettyTables.jl to try out, and anyone can look at the Beautiful Makie website to see what Makie can do. There are plenty of other packages creating graphs, such as SpatialGraphs.jl, PGFPlotsX and GRUtils.jl. For formatting numbers, options include Format.jl and Humanize.jl.
So far, my primary usage has been with personal financial data together with automated processing and backup of photo files. The photo file processing has taken advantage of the ability to compile Julia scripts for added speed because just-in-time compilation always means there is a lag before the real work begins.
VS Code is my chosen editor for working with Julia scripts, since it has a plugin for the language. That adds the REPL, syntax highlighting, execution and data frame viewing capabilities that once were added to the now defunct Atom editor by its own plugin. While it would be nice to have a keyboard shortcut for script execution, the whole thing works well and is regularly updated.
Naturally, there have been a load of queries as I have gone along and the Julia Documentation has been consulted as well as Julia Discourse and Stack Overflow. The latter pair have become regular landing spots on many a Google search. One example followed a glitch that I encountered after a Julia upgrade when I asked a question about this and was directed to the XLSX.jl Migration Guides where I got the information that I needed to fix my code for it to run properly.
There is more learning to do as I continue to use Julia for various things. Once compiled, it does run fast like it has been promised. The syntax paradigm is akin to R and Python, but there are Julia-specific features too. If you have used the others, the learning curve is lessened but not eliminated completely. This is not an object-oriented language as such, but its functional nature makes it familiar enough for getting going with it. In short, the project has come a long way since it started more than ten years ago. There is much for the scientific programmer, but only time will tell if it usurped its older competitors. For now, I will remain interested in it.