Technology Tales

Adventures in consumer and enterprise technology

TOPIC: LORELLE VANFOSSEN

Where's WordPress 2.8?

7th May 2009

It now seems that WordPress 2.7 has been an unqualified success. The major changes that were made to the administration screens have been well received, and the grumblings that were extant about 2.5 and 2.6 seem to have dissipated too. Another observation is that security bugs have not been making their presence felt. All in all, it feels very much like assured progress and may explain why 2.8 has been taking its time in coming.

It's now pencilled in for the end of this month and looks as if it will be a polishing of what already works well. It seems to me that most of the changes are behind the scenes, but there is a new widgets interface that should be ever more user-friendly together with an automated theme installation and upgrade facility that is based on what is already in place for plugins (speaking of which, that interface has been tidied too). Another rough edge that has been removed is the whole business of time zones and daylight saving time. In summary, it seems to be a sharpening of a package that already works well anyway. I have been running it on another site without a whimper of drama, so that's probably saying something. Saying that, quite how they are going to get anyone to upgrade is another matter. For one thing, Lorelle VanFossen's overuse of the word "mandatory" cannot be likely to do it...

In a way, the subject of upgrade fatigue brings me to a recent poll run by Automattic's Jane Wells. Quite a number want to stick with what works, while others fancy a change. This split could be tricky to manage and might even encourage some not to upgrade at all and stick with what works for them. After all, there were two episodes of major upheaval last year and I cannot see everyone wishing to see that happen again. Continual evolutionary freshening would suit me better. Thankfully, any talk of changing the administration screens has been left for 2.9 now, and there's always the option of sticking with 2.8 if what is produced becomes a sufficient irritation. Well, it saves a leap to Habari or another alternative anyway...

My type of blogging

31st August 2007

A recent article by Lorelle VanFossen on The Blog Herald got me thinking about my blogging journey and what I have learned about myself. My brush with reactive blogging has taught a number of lessons. The first of these is that I just cannot keep up with others; someone always gets there first. Another lesson is that taking on a topic of the day takes up loads of time when it lies outside my area of expertise, and I spend a lot of that time researching the topic. What follows from this is that if the post doesn't flow from me, it either takes up a lot of time or it doesn't happen at all. Yes, I have been known to bin stillborn posts due to loss of interest or where things just wouldn't come together at all.

Following all of this, I have come to the conclusion that I am a proactive blogger. That said, I still need to get some bursts of inspiration from somewhere. For instance, my hillwalking blog always experiences a burst of activity after I have been trekking in the outdoors; such encounters never fail to produce something that is worth sharing. In the same vein, anything you find here is likely to influenced by what I have encountered in the technology world. Yes, news items do provide ideas for posts, but it is in a more leisurely way rather than the frenzied approach of some. And like the hillwalking world, such inspiration does have its peaks and troughs.

  • The content, images, and materials on this website are protected by copyright law and may not be reproduced, distributed, transmitted, displayed, or published in any form without the prior written permission of the copyright holder. All trademarks, logos, and brand names mentioned on this website are the property of their respective owners. Unauthorised use or duplication of these materials may violate copyright, trademark and other applicable laws, and could result in criminal or civil penalties.

  • All comments on this website are moderated and should contribute meaningfully to the discussion. We welcome diverse viewpoints expressed respectfully, but reserve the right to remove any comments containing hate speech, profanity, personal attacks, spam, promotional content or other inappropriate material without notice. Please note that comment moderation may take up to 24 hours, and that repeatedly violating these guidelines may result in being banned from future participation.

  • By submitting a comment, you grant us the right to publish and edit it as needed, whilst retaining your ownership of the content. Your email address will never be published or shared, though it is required for moderation purposes.