TOPIC: HUGO
Building a modular Hugo website home page using block-driven front matter
Inspired by building a modular landing page on a Grav-powered subsite, I wondered about doing the same for a Hugo-powered public transport website that I have. It was part of an overall that I was giving it, with AI consultation running shotgun with the whole effort. The home page design was changed from a two-column design much like what was once typical of a blog, to a single column layout with two-column sections.
The now vertical structure consisted of numerous layers. First, there is an introduction with a hero image, which is followed by blocks briefly explaining what the individual sections are about. Below them, two further panels describe motivations and scope expansions. After those, there are two blocks displaying pithy details of recent public transport service developments before two final panels provide links to latest articles and links to other utility pages, respectively.
This was a conscious mix of different content types, with some nesting in the structure. Much of the content was described in page front matter, instead of where it usually goes. Without that flexibility, such a layout would not have been possible. All in all, this illustrates just how powerful Hugo is when it comes to constructing website layouts. The limits essentially are those of user experience and your imagination, and necessarily in that order.
On Hugo Home Pages
Building a home page in Hugo starts with understanding what content/_index.md actually represents. Unlike a regular article file, _index.md denotes a list page, which at the root of the content directory becomes the site's home page. This special role means Hugo treats it differently from a standard single page because the home is always a list page even when the design feels like a one-off.
Front matter in content/_index.md can steer how the page is rendered, though it remains entirely optional. If no front matter is present at all, Hugo still creates the home page at .Site.Home, draws the title from the site configuration, leaves the description empty unless it has been set globally, and renders any Markdown below the front matter via .Content. That minimal behaviour suits sites where the home layout is driven entirely by templates, and it is a common starting point for new projects.
How the Underlying Markdown File Looks
While this piece opens with a description of what was required and built, it is better to look at the real _index.md file. Illustrating the block-driven pattern in practical use, here is a portion of the file:
---
title: "Maximising the Possibilities of Public Transport"
layout: "home"
blocks:
- type: callout
text1: "Here, you will find practical, thoughtful insight..."
text2: "You can explore detailed route listings..."
image: "images/sam-Up56AzRX3uM-unsplash.jpg"
image_alt: "Transpennine Express train leaving Manchester Piccadilly train station"
- type: cards
heading: "Explore"
cols_lg: 6
items:
- title: "News & Musings"
text: "Read the latest articles on rail networks..."
url: "https://ontrainsandbuses.com/news-and-musings/"
- title: "News Snippets"
...
- type: callout
heading: "Motivation"
text2: "Since 2010, British public transport has endured severe challenges..."
image: "images/joseph-mama-aaQ_tJNBK4c-unsplash.jpg"
image_alt: "Buses in Leeds, England, U.K."
- type: callout
heading: "An Expanding Scope"
text2: "You will find content here drawn from Ireland..."
image: "images/snap-wander-RlQ0MK2InMw-unsplash.jpg"
image_alt: "TGV speeding through French countryside"
---
There are several things that are worth noting here. The title and layout: "home" fields appear at the top, with all structural content expressed as a blocks list beneath them. There is no Markdown body because the blocks supply all the visible content, and the file contains no layout logic of its own, only a description of what should appear and in what order. However, the lack of a Markdown body does pose a challenge for spelling and grammar checking using the LanguageTool extension in VSCode, which means that you need to ensure that proofreading needs to happen in a different way, such as using the editor that comes with the LanguageTool browser extension.
Template Selection and Lookup Order
Template selection is where Hugo's home page diverges most noticeably from regular sections. In Hugo v0.146.0, the template system was completely overhauled, and the lookup order for the home page kind now follows a straightforward sequence: layouts/home.html, then layouts/list.html, then layouts/all.html. Before that release, the conventional path was layouts/index.html first, falling back to layouts/_default/list.html, and the older form remains supported through backward-compatibility mapping. In every case, baseof.html is a wrapper rather than a page template in its own right, so it surrounds whichever content template is selected without substituting for one.
The choice of template can be guided further through front matter. Setting layout: "home" in content/_index.md, as in the example above, encourages Hugo to pick a template named home.html, while setting type: "home" enables more specific template resolution by namespace. These are useful options when the home page deserves its own template path without disturbing other list pages.
The Home Template in Practice
With the front matter established, the template that renders it is worth examining in its own right. It happens that the home.html for this site reads as follows:
<!DOCTYPE html>
{{- partial "head.html" . -}}
<body>
{{- partial "header.html" . -}}
<div class="container main" id="content">
<div class="row">
<h2 class="centre">{{ .Title }}</h2>
{{- partial "blocks/render.html" . -}}
</div>
{{- partial "recent-snippets-cards.html" . -}}
{{- partial "home-teasers.html" . -}}
{{ .Content }}
</div>
{{- partial "footer.html" . -}}
{{- partial "cc.html" . -}}
{{- partial "matomo.html" . -}}
</body>
</html>
This template is self-contained rather than wrapping a base template. It opens the full HTML document directly, calls head.html for everything inside the <head> element and header.html for site navigation, then establishes the main content container. Inside that container, .Title is output as an h2 heading, drawing from the title field in content/_index.md. The block dispatcher partial, blocks/render.html, immediately follows and is responsible for looping through .Params.blocks and rendering each entry in sequence, handling all the callout and cards blocks described in the front matter.
Below the blocks, two further partials render dynamic content independently of the front matter. recent-snippets-cards.html displays the two most recent news snippets as full-content cards, while home-teasers.html presents a compact linked list of recent musings alongside a weighted list of utility pages. After those, {{ .Content }} outputs any Markdown written below the front matter in content/_index.md, though in this case, the file has no body content, so nothing is rendered at that point. The template closes with footer.html, a cookie notice via cc.html and a Matomo analytics snippet.
Notice that this template does not use {{ define "main" }} and therefore does not rely on baseof.html at all. It owns the full document structure itself, which is a legitimate approach when the home page has a sufficiently distinct shape that sharing a base template would add complexity rather than reduce it.
The Block Dispatcher
The blocks/render.html partial is the engine that connects the front matter to the individual block templates. Its full content is brief but does considerable work:
{{ with .Params.blocks }}
{{ range . }}
{{ $type := .type | default "text" }}
{{ partial (printf "blocks/%s.html" $type) (dict "page" $ "block" .) }}
{{ end }}
{{ end }}
The with .Params.blocks guard means the entire loop is skipped cleanly if no blocks key is present in the front matter, so pages that do not use the system are unaffected. For each block in the list, the type field is read and passed through printf to build the partial path, so type: callout resolves to blocks/callout.html and type: cards resolves to blocks/cards.html. If a block has no type, the fallback is text, so a blocks/text.html partial would handle it. The dict call constructs a fresh context map passing both the current page (as page) and the raw block data (as block) into the partial, keeping the two concerns cleanly separated.
The Callout Blocks
The callout.html partial renders bordered, padded sections that can carry a heading, an image and up to five paragraphs of text. Used for the website introduction, motivation and expanded scope sections, its template is as follows:
{{ $b := .block }}
<section class="mt-4">
<div class="p-4 border rounded">
{{ with $b.heading }}<h3>{{ . }}</h3>{{ end }}
{{ with $b.image }}
<img
src="{{ . }}"
class="img-fluid w-100 rounded"
alt="{{ $b.image_alt | default "" }}">
{{ end }}
<div class="text-columns mt-4">
{{ with $b.text1 }}<p>{{ . }}</p>{{ end }}
{{ with $b.text2 }}<p>{{ . }}</p>{{ end }}
{{ with $b.text3 }}<p>{{ . }}</p>{{ end }}
{{ with $b.text4 }}<p>{{ . }}</p>{{ end }}
{{ with $b.text5 }}<p>{{ . }}</p>{{ end }}
</div>
</div>
</section>
The pattern here is consistent and deliberate. Every field is wrapped in a {{ with }} block, so fields absent from the front matter produce no output and no empty elements. The heading renders as an h3, sitting one level below the page's h2 title and maintaining a coherent document outline. The image uses img-fluid and w-100 alongside rounded, making it fully responsive and visually consistent with the bordered container. According to the Bootstrap documentation, img-fluid applies max-width: 100% and height: auto so the image scales with its parent, while w-100 ensures it fills the container width regardless of its intrinsic size. The image_alt field falls back to an empty string via | default "" rather than omitting the attribute entirely, which keeps the rendered HTML valid.
Text content sits inside a text-columns wrapper, which allows a stylesheet to apply a CSS multi-column layout to longer passages without altering the template. The numbered paragraph fields text1 through text5 reflect the varying depth of the callout blocks in the front matter: the introductory callout uses two paragraphs, while the Motivation callout uses four. Adding another paragraph field to a block requires only a new {{ with $b.text6 }} line in the partial and a matching text6 key in the front matter entry.
The Section Introduction Blocks
The cards.html partial renders a headed grid of linked blocks, with the column width at large viewports driven by a front matter parameter. This is used for the website section introductions and its template is as follows:
{{ $b := .block }}
{{ $colsLg := $b.cols_lg | default 4 }}
<section class="mt-4">
{{ with $b.heading }}<h3 class="h4 mb-3">{{ . }}</h3>{{ end }}
<div class="row">
{{ range $b.items }}
<div class="col-12 col-md-6 col-lg-{{ $colsLg }} mb-3">
<div class="card h-100 ps-2 pe-2 pt-2 pb-2">
<div class="card-body">
<h4 class="h5 card-title mt-1 mb-2">
<a href="{{ .url }}">{{ .title }}</a>
</h4>
{{ with .text }}<p class="card-text mb-0">{{ . }}</p>{{ end }}
</div>
</div>
</div>
{{ end }}
</div>
</section>
The cols_lg value defaults to 4 if not specified, which produces a three-column grid at large viewports using Bootstrap's twelve-column grid. The transport site's cards block sets cols_lg: 6, giving two columns at large viewports and making better use of the wider reading space for six substantial card descriptions. At medium viewports, the col-md-6 class produces two columns regardless of cols_lg, and col-12 ensures single-column stacking on small screens.
The heading uses the h4 utility class on an h3 element, pulling the visual size down one step while keeping the document outline correct, since the page already has an h2 title and h3 headings in the callout blocks. Each card title then uses h5 on an h4 for the same reason. The h-100 class on the card sets its height to one hundred percent of the column, so all cards in a row grow to match the tallest one and baselines align even when descriptions vary in length. The padding classes ps-2 pe-2 pt-2 pb-2 add a small inset without relying on custom CSS.
Brief Snippets of Recent Public Transport Developments
The recent-snippets-cards.html partial sits outside the blocks system and renders the most recent pair of short transport news posts as full-content cards. Here is its template:
<h3 class="h4 mt-4 mb-3">Recent Snippets</h3>
<div class="row">
{{ range ( first 2 ( where .Site.Pages "Type" "news-snippets" ) ) }}
<div class="col-12 col-md-6 mb-3">
<div class="card h-100">
<div class="card-body">
<h4 class="h6 card-title mt-1 mb-2">
{{ .Date.Format "15:04, January 2" }}<sup>{{ if eq (.Date.Format "2") "2" }}nd{{ else if eq (.Date.Format "2") "22" }}nd{{ else if eq (.Date.Format "2") "1" }}st{{ else if eq (.Date.Format "2") "21" }}st{{ else if eq (.Date.Format "2") "3" }}rd{{ else if eq (.Date.Format "2") "23" }}rd{{ else }}th{{ end }}</sup>, {{ .Date.Format "2006" }}
</h4>
<div class="snippet-content">
{{ .Content }}
</div>
</div>
</div>
</div>
{{ end }}
</div>
The where function filters .Site.Pages to the news-snippets content type, and first 2 takes only the two most recently created entries. Notably, this collection does not call .ByDate.Reverse before first, which means it relies on Hugo's default page ordering. Where precise newest-first ordering matters, chaining ByDate.Reverse before first makes the intent explicit and avoids surprises if the default ordering changes.
The date heading warrants attention. It formats the time as 15:04 for a 24-hour clock display, followed by the month name and day number, then appends an ordinal suffix using a chain of if and else if comparisons against the raw day string. The logic handles the four irregular cases (1st, 21st, 2nd, 22nd, 3rd and 23rd) before falling back to th for all other days. The suffix is wrapped in a <sup> element so it renders as a superscript. The year follows as a separate .Date.Format "2006" call, separated from the day by a comma. Each card renders the full .Content of the snippet rather than a summary, which suits short-form posts where the entire entry is worth showing on the home page.
Latest Musings and Utility Pages Blocks
The home-teasers.html partial renders a two-column row of linked lists, one for recent long-form articles and one for utility pages. Its template is as follows:
<div class="row mt-4">
<div class="col-12 col-md-6 mb-3">
<div class="card h-100">
<div class="card-body">
<h3 class="h5 card-title mb-3">Recent Musings</h3>
{{ range first 5 ((where .Site.RegularPages "Type" "news-and-musings").ByDate.Reverse) }}
<p class="mb-2">
<a href="{{ .Permalink }}">{{ .Title }}</a>
</p>
{{ end }}
</div>
</div>
</div>
<div class="col-12 col-md-6 mb-3">
<div class="card h-100">
<div class="card-body">
<h3 class="h5 card-title mb-3">Extras & Utilities</h3>
{{ $extras := where .Site.RegularPages "Type" "extras" }}
{{ $extras = where $extras "Title" "ne" "Thank You for Your Message!" }}
{{ $extras = where $extras "Title" "ne" "Whoops!" }}
{{ range $extras.ByWeight }}
<p class="mb-2">
<a href="{{ .Permalink }}">{{ .Title }}</a>
</p>
{{ end }}
</div>
</div>
</div>
</div>
The left column uses .Site.RegularPages rather than .Site.Pages to exclude list pages, taxonomy pages and other non-content pages from the results. The news-and-musings type is filtered, sorted with .ByDate.Reverse and then limited to five entries with first 5, producing a compact, current list of article titles. The heading uses h5 on an h3 for the same visual-scale reason seen in the cards blocks, and h-100 on each card ensures the two columns match in height at medium viewports and above.
The right column builds the extras list through three chained where calls. The first narrows to the extras content type, and the subsequent two filter out utility pages that should never appear in public navigation, specifically the form confirmation and error pages. The remaining pages are then sorted by ByWeight, which respects the weight value set in each page's front matter. Pages without a weight default to zero, so assigning small positive integers to the pages that should appear first gives stable, editorially controlled ordering without touching the template.
Diagnosing Template Choices
Diagnosing which template Hugo has chosen is more reliable with tooling than with guesswork. Running the development server with debug output reveals the selected templates in the terminal logs. Another quick technique is to place a visible marker in a candidate file and inspect the page source.
HTML comments are often stripped during minified builds, and Go template comments never reach the output, so an innocuous meta tag makes a better marker because a minifier will not remove it. If the marker does not appear after a rebuild, either the template being edited is not in use because another file higher in the lookup order is taking precedence, or a theme is providing a matching file without it being obvious.
Front Matter Beyond Layout
Front matter on the home page earns its place when it supplies values that make their way into head tags and structured sections, rather than when it tries to replicate layout logic. A brief description is valuable for metadata and social previews because many base templates output it as a meta description tag. Where a site uses social cards, parameters for images and titles can be added and consumed consistently.
Menu participation also remains available to the home page, with entries in front matter allowing the home to appear in navigation with a given weight. Less common but still useful fields include outputs, which can disable or configure output formats, and cascade, which can provide defaults to child pages when site-wide consistency matters. Build controls can influence whether a page is rendered or indexed, though these are rarely changed on a home page once the structure has settled.
Template Hygiene
Template hygiene pays off throughout this process. Whether the home page uses a self-contained template or wraps baseof.html, the principle is the same: each file should own a clearly bounded responsibility. The home template in the example above does this well, with head.html, header.html and footer.html each handling their own concerns, and the main content area occupied by the blocks dispatcher and the two dynamic partials. Column wrappers are easiest to manage when each partial opens and closes its own structure, rather than relying on a sibling to provide closures elsewhere.
That self-containment prevents subtle layout breakage and means that adding a new block type requires only a small partial in layouts/partials/blocks/ and a new entry in the front matter blocks list, with no changes to any existing template. Once the home page adopts this pattern, the need for CSS overrides recedes because the HTML shape finally expresses intent instead of fighting it.
Bootstrap Utility Classes in Summary
Understanding Bootstrap's utility classes rounds off the technique because these classes anchor the modular blocks without the need for custom CSS. h-100 sets height to one hundred percent and works well on cards inside a flex row so that their bottoms align across a grid, as seen in both the cards block and the home teasers. The h4, h5 and h6 utilities apply a different typographic scale to any element without changing the document outline, which is useful for keeping headings visually restrained while preserving accessibility. img-fluid provides responsive behaviour by constraining an image to its container width and maintaining aspect ratio, and w-100 makes an image or any element fill the container width even if its intrinsic size would let it stop short. Together, these classes produce predictable and adaptable blocks that feel consistent across all viewports.
Closing Remarks
The result of combining Hugo's list-page model for the home, a block-driven front matter design and Bootstrap's light-touch utilities is a home page that reads cleanly and remains easy to extend. New block types become a matter of adding a small partial and a new blocks entry, with the dispatcher handling the rest automatically. Dynamic sections such as recent snippets sit in dedicated partials called directly from the template, updating without any intervention in content/_index.md. Existing sections can be reordered without editing templates, shared structure remains in one place, and the need for brittle CSS customisation fades because the templates do the heavy lifting.
A final point returns to content/_index.md. Keeping front matter purposeful makes it valuable. A title, a layout directive and a blocks list that models the editorially controlled page structure are often enough, as we have seen in this example from my public transport website. More seldom-used fields such as outputs, cascade and build remain available should a site require them, but their restraint reflects the wider approach: let content describe structure, let templates handle layout and avoid unnecessary complexity.
Lessons learned during migrations to Grav CMS from Textpattern
After the most of four years since the arrival of Textpattern 4.8.8, Textpattern 4.9.0 was released. Since, I was running two subsites using the software, I tried one of them out with the new version. That broke an elderly navigation plugin that no longer appears in any repository, prompting a rollback, which was successful. Even so, it stirred some curiosity about alternatives to this veteran of the content management system world, which is pushing on for twenty-two years of age. That might have been just as well, given the subsequent release of Textpattern 4.9.1 because of two reported security issues, one of which affecting all preceding versions of the software.
Well before that came to light, there had been a chat session in a Gemini app on a mobile which travelling on a bus. This started with a simple question about alternatives to Textpattern. The ensuing interaction led me to choose Grav CMS after one other option turned out to involve a subscription charge; A personal website side hustle generating no revenue was not going to become a more expensive sideline than it already was, the same reasoning that stops me paying for WordPress plugins.
Exploring Known Options
Without any recourse to AI capability, I already had options. While WordPress was one of those that was well known to me, the organisation of the website was such that it would be challenging to get everything placed under one instance and I never got around to exploring the multisite capability in much depth. Either way, it would prove to involve quite an amount of restructuring, Even having multiple instances would mean an added amount of maintenance, though I do automate things heavily. The number of attack surfaces because of database dependence is another matter.
In the past, I have been a user of Drupal, though its complexity and the steepness of the associated learning curve meant that I never exploited it fully. Since those were pre-AI days, I wonder how things would differ now. Nevertheless, the need to make parts of a website fit in with each other was another challenge that I failed to overcome in those days. Thus, this content framework approach was not one that I wished to use again. In short, this is an enterprise-grade tool that may be above the level of personal web tinkering, and I never did use its capabilities to their full extent.
The move away from Drupal brought me to Hugo around four years ago. That too presents a learning curve, though its inherent flexibility meant that I could do anything that I want with it once I navigated its documentation and ironed out oversights using web engine searches. This static website generator is what rebuilds a public transport website, a history website comprised of writings by my late father together with a website for my freelancing company. There is no database involved, and you can avoid having any dynamic content creation machinery on the web servers too. Using Git, it is possible to facilitate content publishing from anywhere as well.
Why Grav?
Of the lot, Hugo had a lot going for it. The inherent flexibility would not obstruct getting things to fit with a website wide consistency of appearance, and there is nothing to stop one structuring things how they wanted. However, Grav has one key selling point in comparison: straightforward remote production of content without recourse to local builds being uploaded to a web server. That decouples things from needing one to propagate the build machinery across different locations.
Like Hugo, Grav had an active project behind it and a decent supply of plugins and an architecture that bested Textpattern and its usual languid release cycle. The similarity also extended as far as not having to buy into someone else's theme: any theming can be done from scratch for consistency of appearance across different parts of a website. In Grav's case, that means using the Twig PHP templating engine, another thing to learn and reminiscent of Textpattern's Textile as much as what Hugo itself has.
The centricity of Markdown files was another area of commonality, albeit with remote editing. If you are conversant with page files having a combination of YAML front matter and subsequent page content from Hugo, Grav will not seem so alien to you, even if it has a web interface for editing that front matter. This could help if you need to edit the files directly for any reason.
That is never to say that there were no things to learn, for there was plenty of that. For example, it has its own way of setting up modular pages, an idea that I was to retrofit back into a Hugo website afterwards. This means care with module naming as well as caching, editor choice and content collections, each with their own uniqueness that rewards some prior reading. A learning journey was in the offing, a not attractive part of the experience in any event.
Considerations
There have been a number of other articles published here regarding the major lessons learned during the transitions from Textpattern to Grav. Unlike previous experiences with Hugo, another part of this learning was the use of AI as part of any debugging. At times, there was a need to take things step by step, interacting with the AI instead of trying out a script that it had put my way. There are times when one's own context window gets overwhelmed by the flow of text, meaning that such behaviour needs to be taken in hand.
Another thing to watch is that human consultation of the official documentation is not neglected in a quest for speed that lets the AI do that for you; after all, this machinery is fallible; nothing we ever bring into being is without its flaws. Grav itself also comes from a human enterprise that usefully includes its own Discord community. The GitHub repository was not something to which I had recourse, even if the Admin plugin interface has prompts for reporting issues on there. Here, I provide a synopsis of the points to watch that may add to the help provided elsewhere.
Choosing an Editor
By default, Grav Admin uses CodeMirror as its content editor. While CodeMirror is well-suited to editing code, offering syntax highlighting, bracket matching and multiple cursors, it renders its editing surface in a way that standard browser extension APIs cannot reach. Grammar checkers and spell-check extensions such as LanguageTool rely on native editable elements to detect text, and CodeMirror does not use these. The result is that browser-based writing tools produce no output in Grav Admin at all, which is a confirmed architectural incompatibility rather than a configuration issue documented in the LanguageTool issue tracker.
This can be addressed by replacing CodeMirror using the TinyMCE Editor Integration plugin, installable directly from the Admin plugin interface, which brings a familiar style of editor that browser extensions can access normally. Thus, LanguageTool functionality is restored, the writing workflow stays inside Grav Admin and the change requires only a small amount of configuration to prevent TinyMCE from interfering with Markdown files in undesirable ways. Before coming across the TinyMCE Editor plugin, I was seriously toying with the local editing option centred around a Git-based workflow. Here, using VS Code with the LanguageTool extension like I do for Hugo websites remained a strong possibility. The plugin means that the need to do this is not as pressing as it otherwise might be.
None of this appears to edit Twig templates and other configuration files unless one makes use of the Editor plugin. My brief dalliance with this revealed a clunky interface and interference with the appearance of the website, something that I never appreciated when I saw it with Drupal. Thus, the plugin was quickly removed, and I do not miss it. As it happened, editing and creating files over an SSH connection with a lightweight terminal editor worked well enough for me during the setup phase anyway. If I wanted a nicer editing experience, then a Git-based approach would allow local editing in VSCode before pushing the files back onto the server.
Grav Caching
Unlike WordPress, which requires plugins to do so, Grav maintains its own internal cache for compiled pages and assets. Learning to work with it is part of understanding the platform: changes to CSS, JavaScript and other static assets are served from this cache until it is refreshed. That can be accomplished using the admin panel or by removing the contents of the cache directory directly. Once this becomes second nature, it adds very little overhead to the development process.
Modular Pages
On one of the Textpattern subsites, I had set up the landing page in a modular fashion. This carried over to Grav, which has its own way of handling modular pages. There, the modular page system assembles a single page from the files found within a collection of child folders, each presenting a self-contained content block with its own folder, Markdown file and template.
All modules render together under a single URL; they are non-routable, meaning visitors cannot access them directly. When the parent folder contains a modular.md file, the name tells Grav to use the modular.html.twig template and whose front matter defines which modules to include and in what order.
Module folders are identified by an underscore at the start of their name, and numeric prefixes control the display sequence. The prefix must come before the underscore: _01.main is the correct form. For a home page with many sections this structure scales naturally, with folder names such as 01._title, 04._ireland or 13._practicalities-inspiration making the page architecture immediately readable from the file system alone.
Each module's Markdown filename determines which template renders it: a file named text.md looks for text.html.twig in the theme's modular templates folder. The parent modular.md assembles the modules using @self.modular to collect them, with a custom order list giving precise control over sequence. Once the folder naming convention and the template matching relationship are clear, the system is very workable.
Building Navigation
Given that the original impetus for leaving Textpattern was a broken navigation plugin, ensuring that Grav could replicate the required menu behaviour was a matter of some importance. Grav takes a different approach to navigation from database-driven systems, deriving its menu structure directly from the content directory tree using folder naming conventions and front matter flags rather than a dedicated menu editor.
Top-level navigation is driven by numerically prefixed subfolders within the content directory (pages), so a structure such as 01.home, 02.about and 03.blog yields an ordered working menu automatically. Visibility can be fine-tuned without renaming folders by setting visible: true or visible: false in a page's YAML front matter, and menu labels can be shortened for navigation purposes using the menu: field while retaining a fuller title for the page itself.
The primary navigation loop iterates over the visible children of the pages tree and uses the active and activeChild flags on each page object to highlight the current location, whether the visitor is on a given top-level page directly or somewhere within its subtree. A secondary menu for the current section is assembled by first identifying the active top-level page and then rendering its visible children as a list. Testing for activeChild as well as active in the secondary menu is important, as omitting it means that visitors to grandchild pages see no item highlighted at all. The approach differs from what was possible with Textpattern, where a single composite menu could drill down through the full hierarchy, but displaying one menu for pages within a given section alongside another showing the other sections proves to be a workable and context-sensitive alternative.
Setting Up RSS Feeds
Because Grav does not support the generation of RSS feeds out of the box, it needs a plugin and some extra configuration. The latter means that you need to get your head around the Grav concept of a collection because without it, you will not see anything in your feed. In contrast, database-driven platforms like WordPress or Drupal push out the content by default, which may mean that you are surprised when you first come across how Grav needs you to specify the collections explicitly.
There are two details that make performing configuration of a feed straightforward once understood. The first is that Grav routes do not match physical folder paths: a folder named 03.deliberations on disk is referenced in configuration as /deliberations, since the numeric prefix controls navigation ordering but does not appear in the route, that is the actual web page address. The second is the choice between @page.children, which collects only the immediate children of a folder, and @page.descendants, which collects recursively through all subdirectories. The collection definition belongs in the feed page's front matter, specifying where the content lives, how it should be ordered and in which direction.
Where All This Led
Once I got everything set in place, the end results were pleasing, with much learned along the way. Web page responsiveness was excellent, an experience enhanced by the caching of files. In the above discussion, I hardly mentioned the transition of existing content. For one subsite, this was manual because the scale was smaller, and the Admin plugin's interface made everything straightforward such that all was in place after a few hours of work. In the case of the other, the task was bigger, so I fell on an option used for a WordPress to Hugo migration: Python scripting. That greatly reduced the required effort, allowing me to focus on other things like setting up a modular landing page. The whole migration took around two weeks, all during time outside my client work. There are other places where I can use Grav, which surely will add to what I already have learned. My dalliance with Textpattern is feeling a little like history now.
Controlling the version of Python used in the Positron console with virtual environments
Because I have Homebrew installed on my Linux system for getting Hugo and LanguageTool on there, I also have a later version of Python than is available from the Linux Mint repositories. Both 3.12 and 3.13 are on my machine as a consequence. Here is the line in my .bashrc file that makes that happen:
eval "$(/home/linuxbrew/.linuxbrew/bin/brew shellenv)"
The result is when I issue the command which python3, this is what I get:
/home/linuxbrew/.linuxbrew/bin/python3
However, Positron looks to /usr/bin/python3 by default. Since this can get confusing, setting a virtual environment has its uses as long as you create it with the intended Python version. This is how you can do it, even if I needed to use sudo mode for some reason:
python3 -m venv .venv
When working solely on the command line, activating it becomes a necessity, adding another manual step to a mind that had resisted all this until recently:
source .venv/bin/activate
Thankfully, just issuing the deactivate command will do the eponymous action. Even better, just opening a folder with a venv in Positron saves you from issuing the extra commands and grants you the desired Python version in the console that it opens. Having run into some clashes between package versions, I am beginning to appreciate having a dedicated environment for a set of Python scripts, especially when an IDE makes it easy to work with such an arrangement.
Removing query strings from any URL on an Nginx-powered website
My public transport website is produced using Hugo and is hosted on a web server with Nginx. Usually, I use Apache, so this is an exception. When Google highlighted some duplication caused by unneeded query strings, I set to work. However, doing anything with URL's like redirection cannot use a .htaccess file or MOD_REWRITE on Nginx. Thus, such clauses have to go somewhere else and take a different form.
In my case, the configuration file to edit is /etc/nginx/sites-available/default because that was what was enabled. Once I had that open, I needed to find the following block:
location / {
# First attempt to serve request as file, then
# as directory, then fall back to displaying a 404.
try_files $uri $uri/ =404;
}
Because I have one section for port 80 and another for port 443, there were two locations that I needed to update due to duplication, though I may have got away without altering the second of these. After adding the redirection clause, the block became:
location / {
# First attempt to serve request as file, then
# as directory, then fall back to displaying a 404.
try_files $uri $uri/ =404;
# Remove query strings only when necessary
if ($args) {
rewrite ^(.*)$ $1? permanent;
}
}
The result of the addition is a permanent (301) redirection whenever there are arguments passed in a query string. The $1? portion is the rewritten URL without a query string that was retrieved in the initial ^(.*)$ portion. In other words, the redirect it from the original address to a new one with only the part preceding the question mark.
Handily, Nginx allows you to test your updated configuration using the following command:
sudo nginx -t
That helped me with some debugging. Once all was in order, I needed to reload the service by issuing this command:
sudo systemctl reload nginx
With Apache, there is no need to restart the service after updating the .htaccess file, which adds some convenience. The different locations also mean some care with backups when upgrading the operating system or moving from one server to another. Apart from that, all works well, proving that there can be different ways to complete the same task.
Displaying superscripted text in Hugo website content
In a previous post, there was a discussion about displaying ordinal publishing dates with superscripted suffixes in Hugo and WordPress. Here, I go further with inserting superscripted text into Markdown content. Because of the default set up for the Goldmark Markdown renderer, it is not as simple as adding <sup>...</sup> constructs to your Markdown source file. That will generate a warning like this:
WARN Raw HTML omitted while rendering "[initial location of Markdown file]"; see https://gohugo.io/getting-started/configuration-markup/#rendererunsafe
You can suppress this warning by adding the following to your site configuration:
ignoreLogs = ['warning-goldmark-raw-html']
Because JavaScript can be added using HTML tags, there is an added security hazard that could be overlooked if you switch off the warning as suggested. Also, Goldmark does not interpret Markdown specifications of superscripting without an extension whose incorporation needs some familiarity with Go development.
That leaves using a Shortcode. These go into layouts/shortcodes under your theme area; the file containing mine got called super.html. The content is the following one-liner:
<sup>{{ .Get 0 | markdownify }}/sup>
This then is what is added to the Markdown content:
{{< super "th" >}}
What happens here is that the Shortcode picks up the content within the content within the quotes and encapsulates it with the HTML superscript tags to give the required result. This approach can be extended for subscripts and other similar ways of rendering text, too. All that is required is a use case, and the rest can be put in place.
Adding superscripts to ordinal publishing dates for entries in Hugo and WordPress
These web publishing tools differ and so the solutions, yet the use case is the same: displaying ordinal dates for entries in a blog or website. Also, the wish is to have the ordinal suffix superscripted as in normal English usage. Let us take each platform in turn.
Hugo
Given that is programming in Go, it is little surprise that Hugo uses Go's time formatting syntax. Thus, my starting point was as follows:
{{ .Date.Format "15:04, January 2, 2006" }}
The result from the above looks like this: 20:56, January 2, 2025. Unfortunately, Go does not support ordinal dates in its time formatting, so adding them needs more extensive conditional logic like what you see below. The default suffix is th, while nd is added for the second and twenty-second days of the month and rd is added for the third and twenty-third days. This how things now look:
{{ .Date.Format "15:04, January 2" }}{{ if eq (.Date.Format "2") "2" }}nd{{ else if eq (.Date.Format "2") "22" }}nd{{ else if eq (.Date.Format "2") "1" }}st{{ else if eq (.Date.Format "2") "21" }}st{{ else if eq (.Date.Format "2") "3" }}rd{{ else if eq (.Date.Format "2") "23" }}rd{{ else }}th{{ end }}, {{ .Date.Format "2006" }}
That gives you something like 20:56, January 2nd, 2025. The handy thing about Hugo is that it primarily is an HTML output engine, so adding superscripting tags in the right places, like below, superscripts the ordinal suffixes as needed. Here, the tags are shown in bold for emphasis.
{{ .Date.Format "15:04, January 2" }}<sup>{{ if eq (.Date.Format "2") "2" }}nd{{ else if eq (.Date.Format "2") "22" }}nd{{ else if eq (.Date.Format "2") "1" }}st{{ else if eq (.Date.Format "2") "21" }}st{{ else if eq (.Date.Format "2") "3" }}rd{{ else if eq (.Date.Format "2") "23" }}rd{{ else }}th{{ end }}</sup>, {{ .Date.Format "2006" }}
Once you have that: this is how things appear: 20:56, January 2nd, 2025, which gets the job done.
WordPress
Hugo produces the website for you to upload it to the web server; it is static after that. In contrast, WordPress is based on PHP and dynamically renders a web page when it is requested. That means that components are generated at that time. Thus, the following code snippet outputs a date when a website post or page has been published:
<?php the_time('jS F Y') ?>
PHP time and date formatting does account for ordinal dates, unlike what you get in Go. Here, the jS F Y format controls how the date gets displayed. The codes do the following: j outputs the day in the month without a leading zero, S adds the ordinal suffix, F adds the full month name and Y adds the four digit year. The result then is something like this: 1st January 2025. To superscript the ordinal suffix, the following change is needed (the addition is emboldened for emphasis):
<?php the_time('j\<\s\u\p\>S\<\/\s\u\p\> F Y') ?>
Here, the HTML superscript tags are inserted into the format with every character escaped by a leading backslash (). While PHP does generate HTML, it needs the escaping to preserve the intended input here. Security considerations like preventing cross-site scripting also matter, though maybe not so much in this context. Regardless of the technicality, the result becomes 1st January 2025, which is what was sought.
Avoiding permissions, times or ownership failure messages when using rsync
The rsync command is one that I use heavily for doing backups and web publishing. The latter means that it is part of how I update websites built using Hugo because new and/or updated files need uploading. The command also sees usage when uploading files onto other websites as well. During one of these operations, and I am unsure now as to which type is relevant, I encountered errors about being unable to set permissions.
The cause was the encompassing -a option. This is a shorthand for -rltpgoD, and the individual options perform the following:
-r: recursive transfer, copying all contents within a directory hierarchy
-l: symbolic links copied as symbolic links
-t: preserve times
-p: preserve permissions
-g: preserve groups
-o: preserve owners
-D: preserve device and special files
The solution is to some of the options if they are inappropriate. The minimum is to omit the option for permissions preservation, but others may not apply between different servers either, especially when operating systems differ. Removing the options for preserving permissions, groups and owners results in something like this:
rsync -rltD [rest of command]
While it can be good to have a more powerful command with the setting of a single option, it can mean trying to do too much. Another way to avoid permissions and similar errors is to have consistency between source and destination files systems, but that is not always possible.
Why all the commas?
In recent times, I have been making use of Grammarly for proofreading what I write for online consumption. That has applied as much to what I write in Markdown form, as it has with what is authored using content management systems like WordPress and Textpattern.
The free version does nag you to upgrade to a paid subscription, but is not my main irritation. That would be its inflexibility because you cannot turn off rules that you think intrusive, at least in the free version. This comment is particularly applicable to the unofficial plugin that you can install in Visual Studio Code. To me, the add-on for Firefox feels less scrupulous.
There are other options though, and one that I have encountered is LanguageTool. This also offers a Firefox add-on, but there are others not only for other browsers but also Microsoft Word. Recent versions of LibreOffice Writer can connect to a LanguageTool server using in-built functionality, too. There are also dedicated editors for iOS, macOS or Windows.
The one operating that does not get specific add-on support is Linux, but there is another option there. That uses an embedded HTTP server that I installed using Homebrew and set to start automatically using cron. This really helps when using the LanguageTool Linter extension in Visual Studio Code because it can connect to that instead of the public API, which bans your IP address if you overuse it. The extension is also configurable with the ability to add exceptions (both grammatical and spelling), though I appear to have enabled smart formatting only to have it mess up quotes in a Markdown file that then caused Hugo rendering to fail.
Like Grammarly, there is an online editor that offers more if you choose an annual subscription. That is cheaper than the one from Grammarly, so that caused me to go for that instead to get rephrasing suggestions both in the online editor and through a browser add-on. It is better not to get nagged all the time...
The title may surprise you, but I have been using co-ordinating conjunctions without commas for as long as I can remember. Both Grammarly and LanguageTool pick up on these, so I had to do some investigation to find a gap in my education, especially since LanguageTool is so good at finding them. What I also found is how repetitive my writing style can be, which also means that rephrasing has been needed. That, after all, is the point of a proofreading tool, and it can rankle if you have fixed opinions about grammar or enjoy creative writing.
Putting some off-copyright texts from other authors triggers all kinds of messages, but you just have to ignore these. Turning off checks needs care, even if turning them on again is easy to do. There, however, is the danger that artificial intelligence tools could make writing too uniform, since there is only so much that these technologies can do. They should make you look at your text more intently, though, which is never a bad thing because computers still struggle with meaning.
Moves to Hugo
What amazes me is how things can become more complicated over time. As long as you knew HTML, CSS and JavaScript, building a website was not as onerous as long as web browsers played ball with it. Since then, things have got easier to use but more complex at the same time. One example is WordPress: in the early days, themes were much simpler than they are now. The web also has got more insecure over time, and that adds to complexity as well. It sometimes feels as if there is a choice to make between ease of use and simplicity.
It is against that background that I reassessed the technology that I was using on my public transport and Irish history websites. The former used WordPress, while the latter used Drupal. The irony was that the simpler website was using the more complex platform, so the act of going simpler probably was not before time. Alternatives to WordPress were being surveyed for the first of the pair, but none had quite the flexibility, pervasiveness and ease of use that WordPress offers.
There is another approach that has been gaining notice recently. One part of this is the use of Markdown for web publishing. This is a simple and distraction-free plain text format that can be transformed into something more readable. It sees usage in blogs hosted on GitHub, but also facilitates the generation of static websites. The clutter is absent for those who have no need of the Gutenberg Editor on WordPress.
With the content written in Markdown, it can be fed to a static website generator like Hugo. Using defined templates and fixed assets like CSS together with images and other static files, it can slot the content into HTML files very speedily since it is written in the Go programming language. Once you get acclimatised, there are no folder structures that cannot be used, so you get full flexibility in how you build out your website. Sitemaps and RSS feeds can be built at the same time, both using the same input as the HTML files.
In a nutshell, it automates what once needed manual effort used a code editor or a visual web page editor. The use of HTML snippets and layouts means that there is no necessity for hand-coding content, like there was at the start of the web. It also helps that Bootstrap can be built in using Node, so that gives a basis for any styling. Then, SCSS can take care of things, giving even more automation.
Given that there is no database involved in any of this, the required information has to be stored somewhere, and neither the Markdown content nor the layout files contain all that is needed. The main site configuration is defined in a single TOML file, and you can have a single one of these for every publishing destination; I have development and production servers, which makes this a very handy feature. Otherwise, every Markdown file needs a YAML header where titles, template references, publishing status and other similar information gets defined. The layouts then are linked to their components, and control logic and other advanced functionality can be added too.
Because static files are being created, it does mean that site searching and commenting, or contact pages cannot work like they would on a dynamic web platform. Often, external services are plugged in using JavaScript. One that I use for contact forms is Forminit. Then, Zapier has had its uses in using the RSS feed to tweet site updates on Twitter when new content gets added. Though I made different choices, Disqus can be used for comments and Algolia for site searching. Generally, though, you can find yourself needing to pay, particularly if you need to remove advertising or gain advanced features.
Some commenting service providers offer open source self-hosted options, but I found these difficult to set up and ended up not offering commenting at all. That was after I tried out Cactus Comments only to find that it was not discriminating between pages, so it showed the same comments everywhere. There are numerous alternatives like Remark42, Hyvor Talk, Commento, FastComments, Utterances, Isso, Mouthful, Muut and HyperComments but trying them all out was too time-consuming for what commenting was worth to me. It also explains why some static websites even send readers to Twitter if they have something to say, though I have not followed this way of working.
For searching, I added a JavaScript/JSON self-hosted component to the transport website, and it works well. However, it adds to the size of what a browser needs to download. That is not a major issue for desktop browsers, but the situation with mobile browsers is such that it has a sizeable effect. Testing with PageSpeed and Lighthouse highlighted this, even if I left things as they are. The solution works well in any case.
One thing that I have yet to work out is how to edit or add content while away from home. Editing files using an SSH connection is as much a possibility as setting up a Hugo publishing setup on a laptop. After that, there is the question of using a tablet or phone, since content management systems make everything web based. These are points that I have yet to explore.
As is natural with a code-based solution, there is a learning curve with Hugo. Reading a book provided some orientation, and looking on the web resolved many conundrums. There is good documentation on the project website, while forum discussions turn up on many a web search. Following any research, there was next to nothing that could not be done in some way.
Migration of content takes some forethought and took quite a bit of time, though there was an opportunity to carry some housekeeping as well. The history website was small, so copying and pasting sufficed. For the transport website, I used Python to convert what was on the database into Markdown files before refining the result. That provided some automation, but left a lot of work to be done afterwards.
The results were satisfactory, and I like the associated simplicity and efficiency. That Hugo works so fast means that it can handle large websites, so it is scalable. The new Markdown method for content production is not problematical so far apart from the need to make it more portable, and it helps that I found a setup that works for me. This also avoids any potential dealbreakers that continued development of publishing platforms like WordPress or Drupal could bring. For the former, I hope to remain with the Classic Editor indefinitely, but now have another option in case things go too far.
Building a sitemap in XML
While there are many tools that will build XML site maps, there is some satisfaction to be had in creating your own. This is despite there being a multitude of search engine optimisation plugins for content management systems like WordPress or what is built into static site generators like Hugo. Sometimes, building your own allows for added simplicity, and that is shared with recent efforts in WordPress theme development.
The sitemap XML protocol is simple enough to offer a short coding project. The basis was what Hugo generates, and I used Python to create the XML files. The only libraries that I needed were configparser, SQLAlchemy and pandas. The first two of these allowed databases to be queried, and the last on the list was used for data processing. Otherwise, it was a case of using what is built into the Python language, like file writing and looping.
Once the scripts were ready, they could be uploaded to web servers and executed by scheduled jobs using CRON to keep things up to date. Along the way, I also uncovered a way to publicise the locations of the sitemap files to search engine bots using robots.txt. The structure of the instruction is the following:
User-agent: *
Sitemap: sitemap.xml
This means that it announces to all bots the location of the sitemap file. In my case, I always included the full URL for the XML file, and that clearly varies by website location.