TOPIC: GEDIT
Automatically enabling your network connection at startup on CentOS 7
15th August 2014CentOS 7's release sparked my curiosity, so I tried it in a VirtualBox virtual machine. It uses GNOME Shell in classic mode, making it feel similar to GNOME 2. One thing to note is that it requires at least VirtualBox version 4.3.14, or the Guest Additions kernel drivers won't compile. This might seem surprising when you learn it uses kernel version 3.10.x and GNOME Shell 3.8.4. Like Debian production releases, CentOS chooses established versions for stability, fitting its enterprise-focused user base. Despite this conservative approach, it still looks good, though trying to change the desktop background froze the machine. Otherwise, most things work well.
However, there are surprises, including one I noticed: network connectivity needed switching on every time the VM started. This occurs with the default installation and has been a known issue since at least CentOS 6. It's not difficult to fix once you know how.
What you need to do is look for the relevant configuration file in /etc/sysconfig/network-scripts/ and update that. Using the ifconfig command, I found that the name of the network interface. Usually, this is something like eth0, but it was enp0s3 in my case, so I had to look for a file named ifcfg-enp0s3 and edit that. The text that is sought is ONBOOT=no and that needs to become ONBOOT=yes for network connections to start automatically. To do something similar from the command line, CentOS had suggested the following:
sed -i -e 's@^ONBOOT="no@ONBOOT="yes@' ifcfg-enp0s3
This uses sed for an inline (and case-insensitive) edit of the file to change 'no' to 'yes' after accessing the /etc/sysconfig/network-scripts/ directory. I edited manually with Gedit, which also works. Note that file editing needs superuser privileges, so switch to root with the su command or use sudo.
Fixing Background Image Display in GNOME Shell 3.10
2nd May 2014On upgrading from Ubuntu GNOME 13.10 to Ubuntu GNOME 14.04, a few rough edges were to be noticed. One was the display of my chosen background image: it was garbled. Later, I discovered that there is a maximum width of 2560 px for background images in GNOME Shell these days and that things get messy beyond that.
In my case, the image width was around 6000 px, and I was used to it getting resized in GNOME Shell 3.8 and its predecessors. It appears that the functionality got removed after that though, so the workaround of manual image resizing in the GIMP needed to be employed. Though having big images open in memory creates an additional overhead, not handling them very well at all looks like a bug caused by setting 2560 px as a maximum screen width for the GNOME Shell panel and the complete removal of Nautilus from desktop rendering duties. Let's hope that sense is seen with ever larger screen sizes and resolutions coming our way.
It's the sort of thing that did get me looking at adding on Cinnamon 2.2 for a while before setting background image scaling using the indispensable GNOME Tweak Tool was discovered. LinuxG.net has a useful tutorial on this for anyone with such an adventurous streak in them. For now though, I am OK with my set-up but the GNOME project's focus on minimalism could affect us in other ways, so I can see why Clem Lefebvre started the Cinnamon one primarily for Linux Mint and the desktop environment is appearing elsewhere too. After all, Gedit lost its menu bar in GNOME 3.12 so it's just as well that we have alternatives.
Update 2014-05-06: It appears that the desktop image bug that afflicts GNOME Shell 3.10 got sorted for GNOME Shell 3.12. At least, that is the impression that an Antergos instance in a VirtualBox virtual machine gives me.
Surveying changes coming in GNOME 3.10
20th October 2013GNOME 3.10 was released last month, but I only saw it when it appeared in the Arch and Antergos repositories. Despite stability risks, this showcases a strength of rolling distributions: they let you see the latest software before others. Otherwise, you might need to wait for the next Fedora release to view GNOME updates. This delay isn't always negative, as Ubuntu GNOME typically uses the previous version. Since many GNOME Shell extension developers don't update until Fedora includes the latest GNOME in a stable release, this approach ensures the desktop environment is well established before reaching Ubuntu. Debian takes this further by using a stable version from years ago, which has merits for system reliability.
As I regularly use GNOME Shell extensions, I'm interested in which ones still work, which need tweaking, and which no longer function. The main change in the top panel is the replacement of separate sound and user menus with a single combined menu. Extensions that modified the user menu now need reworking or abandoning. The GNOME project has adopted an irritating habit similar to WordPress, with frequent API changes that break extensions (or plugins in WordPress). However, GNOME should copy WordPress's approach to documentation, particularly for the API, which is barely documented anywhere.
GNOME Shell theme developers face challenges too. When I used Elementary Luna 3.4, a large border appeared around the panel, so I switched to XGnome Enhanced (found via GNOME-Look.org). The former theme is no longer maintained as its developer has stopped using GNOME Shell. Perhaps someone else could take it over, since it worked well until version 3.8. The new theme works well for me and will be an option if I upgrade to GNOME 3.10 on one of my PCs in the future.
Returning to the subject of extensions, I tested the included Applications Menu extension, which has improved stability and looks very usable. I no longer need to wait for the Frippery equivalent to be updated. The GNOME Shell backstage view hasn't changed much since 3.8, which may disappoint some, but the workaround works well. Several extensions I use frequently haven't been updated for GNOME Shell 3.10 yet. After some success before a possible upgrade to Ubuntu GNOME 13.10 and GNOME Shell 3.8 (though I'm staying with version 13.04 for now), I tried to port some of these to the latest interface. Below are my updated extensions, which you can use until they're officially updated on the GNOME Shell Extensions website:
GNOME 3.10 brings other modifications beyond GNOME Shell, which is mainly a JavaScript construction. Application title bars continue to be consolidated in GNOME applications, with a prominent exit button now appearing. You can still apply the previously mentioned modifications to Nautilus (also called Files), many of which work with other applications like Gedit. Gedit now includes useful 'x of y' numbering for search results, showing the current match number and total matches. The GNOME Tweak Tool has been overhauled, but no longer includes the setting for showing folder paths in Nautilus. To enable this feature, open dconf-editor, navigate to org > gnome > nautilus > preferences and tick the always-use-location-entry box.
The GNOME project continues on its path established a few years ago. While I wish GNOME Shell were more mature, significant changes are still coming, making me wonder when this will stop. This might be the result of introducing a controversial experiment when users were content with GNOME 2. Fedora 20 should bring more updated GNOME shell extensions. Antergos provides a good way to see the latest GNOME version if it remains stable. Cinnamon fans may be happy that Cinnamon 2.0 is another desktop option for the Arch-based distribution, one that I may discuss this further once the Antergos installer stops failing at package downloads. I'm setting up a separate VM to examine Cinnamon because it destabilised GNOME during a previous review.
A reasonable requirement of an IDE
20th May 2008I have been having a play with NetBeans IDE Early Access for PHP and, while it has a lot to offer, one impression remains uppermost in my mind: it is so slow. While I might have a project with many files in it, start-up takes an age because of project checking. Other functionality such as text searching is far from speedy either. The sluggishness probably arises from this release being very early in its life cycle, and it reminds me of how slow older versions of the Java IDE were, even if this is slower. For PHP development, I'll be giving NetBeans a while to mature before taking another look at it.
On a similar note, I recently dispatched Quanta Plus from my system for sluggish start-ups and will not return to it because other alternatives such as Bluefish and Eclipse PDT fit my needs much better. I like my editors to be slick and responsive, and Quanta has been around long enough for any slowness to be knocked out of it. However, I get the feeling that the extras have added bloat, while I expect any additional functionality that I never use not to get in my way. It is for the latter reason that I was always able to get on with Dreamweaver and even run it on Ubuntu using the WINE library. If I really wanted a stripped out yet functional editor, Gedit would do most of what I need - it colour-codes syntax for a variety of languages for a start - but it's always handy to have a file system explorer window incorporated and I value any syntax checking and auto-completion as well. So, it looks as if Eclipse and Bluefish could be serving my needs for a while to come, alongside so use Dreamweaver for online editing of website files.