TOPIC: DATA SECURITY
Copying only updated new or updated files by command line in Linux or Windows
2nd August 2014With a growing collection of photographic images, I often find myself making backups of files using copy commands and the data volumes are such that I don't want to keep copying the same files over and over again, so incremental file transfers are what I need. So commands like the following often get issued from a Linux command line:
cp -pruv [source] [destination]
Because this is on Linux, it is the bash shell that I use, so the switches may not apply with others like ssh, fish or ksh. For my case, p preserves file properties such as its time and date and the cp command does not do this always, so it needs adding. The r switch is useful because the copy then in recursive, so only a directory needs to be specified as the source and the destination needs to be one level up from a folder with the same name there to avoid file duplication. It is the u switch that makes the file copy incremental, and the v one issues messages to the shell that show how the copying is going. Seeing a file name issued by the latter does tell you how much more needs to be copied and that the files are going where they should.
What inspired this post though is my need to do the same in a Windows session, and issuing xcopy commands will achieve the same end. Here are two that will do the needful:
xcopy [source] [destination] /d /s
xcopy [source] [destination] /d /e
In both cases, it is the d switch that ensures that the copy is incremental, and you can add a date too, with a colon between it and the /d, if you see fit. The s switch copies only directories that contain files, while the e one copies even empty directories. Using the d switch without either of those did not trigger any copying action when I tried, so I reckon that you cannot do without either of them. By default, both of these commands issue output to the command line so you can keep an eye on what is happening, and this especially is useful when ensuring that files are going to the right destination because the behaviour differs from that of the bash shell on Linux.