Technology Tales

Fixing Python path issues after Homebrew updates on Linux Mint

With Python available by default, it is worth asking how the version on my main Linux workstation is made available courtesy of Homebrew. All that I suggest is that it either was needed by something else or I fancied having a newer version that was available through the Linux Mint repos. Regardless of the now vague reason for doing so, it meant that I had some work to do after running the following command to update and upgrade all my Homebrew packages:

brew update; brew upgrade

The first result was this message when I tried running a Python script afterwards:

-bash: /home/linuxbrew/.linuxbrew/bin/python3: No such file or directory

The solution was to issue the following command to re-link Python:

brew link --overwrite python@3.13

Since you may have a different version by the time that you read this, just change 3.13 above to whatever you have on your system. All was not quite sorted for me after that, though.

My next task was to make Pylance look in the right place for Python packages because they had been moved too. Initial inquiries were suggesting complex if robust solutions. Instead, I went for a simpler fix. The first step was to navigate to File > Preferences > Settings in the menus. Then, I sought out the Open Settings (JSON) icon in the top right of the interface and clicked on it to open a JSON containing VSCode settings. Once in there, I edited the file to end up with something like this:

    "python.analysis.extraPaths": [
        "/home/[account name]/.local/bin",
        "/home/[account name]/.local/lib/python[python version]/site-packages"
    ]

Clearly, your [account name] and [python version] need to be filled in above. That approach works for me so far, leaving the more complex alternative for later should I come to need that.

An Overview of MCP Servers in Visual Studio Code

Agent mode in Visual Studio Code now supports an expanding ecosystem of Model Context Protocol servers that equip the editor’s built-in assistant with practical tools. By installing these servers, an agent can connect to databases, invoke APIs and perform automated or specialised operations without leaving the development environment. The result is a more capable workspace where routine tasks are streamlined, and complex ones are broken into more manageable steps. The catalogue spans developer tooling, productivity services, data and analytics, business platforms, and cloud or infrastructure management. If something you rely on is not yet present, there is a route to suggest further additions. Guidance on using MCP tools in agent mode is available in the documentation, and the Command Palette, opened with Ctrl+Shift+P, remains the entry point for many workflows.

The servers in the developer tools category concentrate on everyday software tasks. GitHub integration brings repositories, issues and pull requests into reach through a secure API, so that code review and project coordination can continue without switching context. For teams who use design files as a source of truth, Figma support extracts UI content and can generate code from designs, with the note that using the latest desktop app version is required for full functionality. Browser automation is covered by Playwright from Microsoft, which drives tests and data collection using accessibility trees to interact with the page, a technique that often results in more resilient scripts. The attention to quality and reliability continues with Sentry, where an agent can retrieve and analyse application errors or performance issues directly from Sentry projects to speed up triage and resolution.

The breadth of developer capability extends to machine learning and code understanding. Hugging Face integration provides access to models, datasets and Spaces on the Hugging Face Hub, which is useful for prototyping, evaluation or integrating inference into tools. For source exploration beyond a single repository, DeepWiki by Kevin Kern offers querying and information extraction from GitHub repositories indexed on that service. Converting documents is handled by MarkItDown from Microsoft, which takes common files like PDF, Word, Excel, images or audio and outputs Markdown, unifying content for notes, documentation or review. Finding accurate technical guidance is eased by Microsoft Docs, a Microsoft-provided server that searches Microsoft Learn, Azure documentation and other official technical resources. Complementing this is Context7 from Upstash, which returns up-to-date, version-specific documentation and code examples from any library or framework, an approach that addresses the common problem of answers drifting out of date as software evolves.

Visual assets and code health have their own role. ImageSorcery by Sunrise Apps performs local image processing tasks, including object detection, OCR, editing and other transformations, a capability that supports anything from quick asset tweaks to automated checks in a content pipeline. Codacy completes the developer picture with comprehensive code quality and security analysis. It covers static application security testing, secrets detection, dependency scanning, infrastructure as code security and automated code review, which helps teams maintain standards while moving quickly.

Productivity services focus on planning, tracking and knowledge capture. Notion’s server allows viewing, searching, creating and updating pages and databases, meaning an agent can assemble notes or checklists as it progresses. Linear integration brings the ability to create, update and track issues in Linear’s project management platform, reflecting a growing preference for lightweight, developer-centred planning. Asana support provides task and project management together with comments, allowing multi-team coordination. Atlassian’s server connects to Jira and Confluence for issue tracking and documentation, which suits organisations that rely on established workflows for governance and audit trails. Monday.com adds another project management option, with management of boards, items, users, teams and workspace operations. These capabilities sit alongside automation from Zapier, which can create workflows and execute tasks across more than 30,000 connected apps to remove repetitive steps and bind systems together when native integrations are limited.

Two Model Context Protocol utilities add cognitive structure to how the agent works. Sequential Thinking helps break down complex tasks into manageable steps with transparent tracking, so progress is visible and revisable. Memory provides long-lived context across sessions, allowing an agent to store and retrieve relevant information rather than relying on a single interaction. Together, they address the practicalities of working on multi-stage tasks where recalling decisions, constraints or partial results is as important as executing the next action. Used with the productivity servers, these tools underpin a systematic approach to projects that span hours or days.

The data and analytics group is comprehensive, stretching from lightweight local analysis to cloud-scale services. DuckDB by Kentaro Tanaka enables querying and analysis of DuckDB databases both locally and in the cloud, which suits ad hoc exploration as well as embedded analytics in applications. Neon by neondatabase labs provides access to Postgres with the notable addition of natural language operations for managing and querying databases, which lowers the barrier to occasional administrative tasks. Prisma Postgres from Prisma brings schema management, query execution, migrations and data modelling to the agent, supporting teams who already use Prisma’s ORM in their applications. MongoDB integration supports database operations and management, with the ability to execute queries, manage collections, build aggregation pipelines and perform document operations, allowing front-end and back-end tasks to be coordinated through a single interface.

Observability and product insight are also represented. PostHog offers analytics access for creating annotations and retrieving product usage insights so that changes can be correlated with user behaviour. Microsoft Clarity provides analytics data including heatmaps, session recordings and other user behaviour insights that complement quantitative metrics and highlight usability issues. Web data collection has two strong options. Apify connects the agent with Apify’s Actor ecosystem to extract data from websites and automate broader workflows built on that platform. Firecrawl by Mendable focuses on extracting data from websites using web scraping, crawling and search with structured data extraction, a combination that suits building datasets or feeding search indexes. These tools bridge real-world usage and the development cycle, keeping decision-making grounded in how software is experienced.

The business services category addresses payments, customer engagement and web presence. Stripe integration allows the creation of customers, management of subscriptions and generation of payment links through Stripe APIs, which is often enough to pilot monetisation or administer accounts. PayPal provides the ability to create invoices, process payments and access transaction data, ensuring another widely used channel can be managed without bespoke scripts. Square rounds out payment options with facilities to process payments and manage customers across its API ecosystem. Intercom support brings access to customer conversations and support tickets for data analysis, allowing an agent to summarise themes, surface follow-ups or route issues to the right place. For building and running sites, Wix integration helps with creating and managing sites that include e-commerce, bookings and payment features, while Webflow enables creating and managing websites, collections and content through Webflow’s APIs. Together, these options cover a spectrum of online business needs, from storefronts to content-led marketing.

Cloud and infrastructure operations are often the backbone of modern projects, and the MCP catalogue reflects this. Convex provides access to backend databases and functions for real-time data operations, making it possible to work with stateful server logic directly from agent mode. Azure integration supports management of Azure resources, database queries and access to Azure services so that provisioning, configuration and diagnostics can be performed in context. Azure DevOps extends this to project and release processes with management of projects, work items, repositories, builds, releases and test plans, providing an end-to-end view for teams invested in Microsoft’s tooling. Terraform from HashiCorp introduces infrastructure as code management, including plan, apply and destroy operations, state management and resource inspection. This combination makes it feasible to review and adjust infrastructure, coordinate deployments and correlate changes with code or issue history without switching tools.

These servers are designed to be installed like other VS Code components, visible from the MCP section and accessible in agent mode once configured. Many entries provide a direct route to installation, so setup friction is limited. Some include specific requirements, such as Figma’s need for the latest desktop application, and all operate within the Model Context Protocol so that the agent can call tools predictably. The documentation explains usage patterns for each category, from parameterising database queries to invoking external APIs, and clarifies how capabilities appear inside agent conversations. This is useful for understanding the scope of what an agent can do, as well as for setting boundaries in shared environments.

In day-to-day use, the value comes from combining servers to match a workflow. A developer investigating a production incident might consult Sentry for errors, query Microsoft Docs for guidance, pull related issues from GitHub and draft changes to documentation with MarkItDown after analysing logs held in DuckDB. A product manager could retrieve usage insights from PostHog, review session recordings in Microsoft Clarity, create follow-up tasks in Linear and brief customer support by summarising Intercom conversations, all while keeping a running Memory of key decisions. A data practitioner might gather inputs from Firecrawl or Apify, store intermediates in MongoDB, perform local analysis in DuckDB and publish a report to Notion, building a repeatable chain with Zapier where steps can be automated. In infrastructure scenarios, Terraform changes can be planned and applied while Azure resources are inspected, with release coordination handled through Azure DevOps and updates documented in Confluence via the Atlassian server.

Security and quality concerns are woven through these flows. Codacy can evaluate code for vulnerabilities or antipatterns as changes are proposed, surfacing SAST findings, secrets detection problems or dependency risks before they progress. Stripe, PayPal and Square centralise payment operations to a few well-audited APIs rather than bespoke integrations, which reduces surface area and simplifies auditing. For content and data ingestion, ImageSorcery ensures that image transformations occur locally and MarkItDown produces traceable Markdown outputs from disparate file types, keeping artefacts consistent for reviews or archives. Sequential Thinking helps structure longer tasks, and Memory preserves context so that actions are explainable after the fact, which is helpful for compliance as well as everyday collaboration.

Discoverability and learning resources sit close to the tools themselves. The Visual Studio Code website’s navigation surfaces areas such as Docs, Updates, Blog, API, Extensions, MCP, FAQ and Dev Days, while the Download path remains clear for new installations. The MCP area groups servers by capability and links to documentation that explains how agent mode calls each tool. Outside the product, the project’s presence on GitHub provides a route to raise issues or follow changes. Community activity continues on channels including X, LinkedIn, Bluesky and Reddit, and there are broadcast updates through the VS Code Insiders Podcast, TikTok and YouTube. These outlets provide context for new server additions, changes to the protocol and examples of how teams are putting the pieces together, which can be as useful as the tools themselves when establishing good practices.

It is worth noting that the catalogue is curated but open to expansion. If there is an MCP server that you expect to see, there is a path to suggest it, so gaps can be addressed over time. This flows from the protocol’s design, which encourages clean interfaces to external systems, and from the way agent mode surfaces capabilities. The cumulative effect is that the assistant inside VS Code becomes a practical co-worker that can search documentation, change infrastructure, file issues, analyse data, process payments or summarise customer conversations, all using the same set of controls and the same context. The common protocol keeps these interactions predictable, so adding a new server feels familiar even when the underlying service is new.

As the ecosystem grows, the connection between development work and operations becomes tighter, and the assistant’s job is less about answering questions in isolation than orchestrating tools on the developer’s behalf. The MCP servers outlined here provide a foundation for that shift. They encapsulate the services that many teams already rely on and present them inside agent mode so that work can continue where the code lives. For those getting started, the documentation explains how to enable the tools, the Command Palette offers quick access, and the community channels provide a steady stream of examples and updates. The result is a VS Code experience that is better equipped for modern workflows, with MCP servers supplying the functionality that turns agent mode into a practical extension of everyday work.

And then there was one...

Even with the rise of the internet, magazine publishing was in rude health at the end of the last century. That persisted through the first decade of this century before any decline began to be noticed. Now, things are a poor shadow of what once used to be.

Though a niche area with some added interest, Linux magazine publishing has not been able to escape this trend. At the height of the flourish, we had the launch of Linux Voice by former writers of Linux Format. That only continues as a section in Linux Magazine these days, one of the first casualties from a general decline in readership.

Next, it was the turn of Linux User & Developer. This came into the hands of Future when they acquired Imagine Publishing and remained in print for a time after that due to the conditions of the deal set by the competition regulator. Once beyond that, Future closed it to stick with its own more lightweight title, Linux Format, transferring some of the writers across to the latter. This echoed what they did with Web Designer; they closed that in favour of .Net.

In both cases, dispatching the in-house publications might have been a better idea; without content, you cannot have readers. In time, .Net met its demise and the same fate awaited Linux Format a few months ago after it celebrated its silver jubilee. There was no goodbye edition this time: it went out with a bang, reminding us of glory days that have passed. The content was becoming more diverse with hardware features getting included, perhaps reflecting that something else was happening behind the scenes.

After all that, Linux Magazine soldiers on to outlive the others. It perhaps helps that it is published by an operation centred around the title, Linux New Media, which also publishes Admin Magazine. Even so, it too has needed to trim things a bit. For a time, there was a dedicated Raspberry Pi title that lives on as a section in Linux Magazine.

It was while sprucing up some of the content on here that I was reminded of the changes. Where do you find surveys of what is available? The options could include desktop environments and Linux distributions as much as code editors, web browsers and other kinds of software. While it is true that operations like Future have portals for exactly this kind of thing, they too have a nemesis in the form of GenAI. Asking ChatGPT may be their undoing as much as web publishing triggered a decline in magazine publishing.

Technology upheaval means destruction as much as creation, and there are occasions when spending quiet time reading a paper periodical is just what you need. We all need time away from screen reading, whatever the device happens to be.

An AI email newsletter roundup: Cutting through the noise

This time last year, I felt out of the loop on all things AI. That was put to rights during the autumn when I experimented a lot with GenAI while enhancing travel content on another portal. In addition, I subscribed to enough email newsletters that I feel the need to cull them at this point. Maybe I should use a service like Kill the Newsletter to consolidate things into an RSS feed instead; that sounds like an interesting option for dealing with any overload.

So much is happening in this area that it is too easy to feel overwhelmed by what is happening. That sense got me compiling the state of things in a previous post using some help from GenAI, though I was making the decisions about what was being consolidated and how it was being done. The whole process took a few hours, an effort clearly beyond a single button push.

This survey is somewhat eclectic in its scope; two of the newsletters are hefty items, while others include brevity as part of their offer. Regarding the latter, I found strident criticism of some of them (The Rundown and Superhuman are two that are mentioned) in an article published in the Financial Times, which is behind a paywall. Their content has been called slop, with the phrase slopaganda being coined and used to describe this. That cannot be applied everywhere, though. Any brevity cannot cloak differences in tone and content choices can help with developing a more rounded view of what is going on with AI.

Enterprise AI Governance

This newsletter came to my notice because I attended SAS Innovate on Tour 2025 in London last June. Oliver Patel, who authors this and serves as Enterprise AI Governance Lead at AstraZeneca as well as contributing to various international organisations including the OECD Expert Group on AI Risk and Accountability, was a speaker with the theme of his talk naturally being AI governance as well as participating in an earlier panel on the day. Unsurprisingly, the newsletter also got a mention.

It provides in-depth practical guidance on artificial intelligence governance and risk management for professionals working in enterprise environments, though not without a focus on scaling governance frameworks across organisations. Actionable insights are emphasised in place of theoretical concepts, covering areas such as governance maturity models that progress from nascent stages through to transformative governance, implementation strategies and leadership approaches needed to drive effective AI governance within companies.

Patel brings experience from roles spanning policy work, academia and privacy sectors, including positions with the UK government and University College London, which informs his practical approach to helping organisations develop robust AI governance structures. The newsletter targets AI governance professionals, risk managers and executives who need clear, scalable solutions for real-world implementation challenges, and all content remains freely accessible to subscribers.

Mindstream

Unlike other newsletters featured here, this is a seven-day publication that delivers a five‑minute digest on AI industry happenings each day that combines news, productivity tips, polls and AI‑generated art. It was launched in June 2023 by Matt Village and Adam Biddlecombe, using of beehiiv’s content‑focused platform that was acquired by HubSpot in March 2025, placing it within the HubSpot Media Network.

Superhuman

Created by Zain Kahn and based in Toronto, weekday issues of this newsletter typically follow a structured format featuring three AI tools for productivity enhancement, two significant AI developments and one quick tutorial to develop practical skills. On Saturdays, there is a round-up on what is happening in robotics, while the Sunday issue centres on developments in science. Everything is crafted to be brief, possibly allowing a three-minute survey of latest developments.

The Artificially Intelligent Enterprise

My interest in the world of DevOps led me to find out about Mark Hinkle, the solopreneur behind Peripety Labs and his in-depth weekly newsletter published every Friday that features comprehensive deep dives into strategic trends and emerging technologies. This has been complemented by a shorter how-to version which focusses on concrete AI lessons and implementation tips and comes out every Tuesday, taking forward a newsletter acquired from elsewhere. The idea is that we should concentrate on concrete AI lessons and implementation tips in place of hype, particularly in business settings. These forms part of The AIE Network alongside complementary publications including AI Tangle, AI CIO and AI Marketing Advantage.

The Rundown AI

Found though my following the Artificially Intelligent Enterprise, this daily newsletter delivers artificial intelligence developments and insights within approximately five minutes of reading time per issue. Published by Rowan Cheung, it covers key AI developments, practical guides and tool recommendations, with some articles spanning technology and robotics categories. Beyond the core newsletter, the platform operates AI University, which provides certificate courses, implementation guides, expert-led workshops and community networking opportunities for early adopters.

A snapshot of the current state of AI: Developments from the last few weeks

A few unsettled days earlier in the month may have offered a revealing snapshot of where artificial intelligence stands and where it may be heading. OpenAI’s launch of GPT‑5 arrived to high expectations and swift backlash, and the immediate aftermath said as much about people as it did about technology. Capability plainly matters, but character, control and continuity are now shaping adoption just as strongly, with users quick to signal what they value in everyday interactions.

The GPT‑5 debut drew intense scrutiny after technical issues marred day one. An autoswitcher designed to route each query to the most suitable underlying system crashed at launch, making the new model appear far less capable than intended. A live broadcast compounded matters with a chart mishap that Sam Altman called a “mega chart screw‑up”, while lower than expected rate limits irritated early users. Within hours, the mood shifted from breakthrough to disruption of familiar workflows, not least because GPT‑5 initially displaced older options, including the widely used GPT‑4o. The discontent was not purely about performance. Many had grown accustomed to 4o’s conversational tone and perceived emotional intelligence, and there was a sense of losing a known counterpart that had become part of daily routines. Across forums and social channels, people described 4o as a model with which they had formed a rapport that spanned routine work and more personal support, with some comparing the loss to missing a colleague. In communities where AI relationships are discussed, engagement to chatbot companions and the influence of conversational style, memory for context and affective responses on day‑to‑day reliance came to the fore.

OpenAI moved quickly to steady the situation. Altman and colleagues fielded questions on Reddit to explain failure modes, pledged more transparency, and began rolling out fixes. Rate limits for paid tiers doubled, and subsequent changes lifted the weekly allowance for advanced reasoning from 200 “thinking” messages to 3,000. GPT‑4o returned for Plus subscribers after a flood of requests, and a “Show Legacy Models” setting surfaced so that subscribers could select earlier systems, including GPT‑4o and o3, rather than be funnelled exclusively to the newest release. The company clarified that GPT‑5’s thinking mode uses a 196,000‑token context window, addressing confusion caused by a separate 32,000 figure for the non‑reasoning variant, and it explained operational modes (Auto, Fast and Thinking) more clearly. Pricing has fallen since GPT‑4’s debut, routing across multiple internal models should improve reliability, and the system sustains longer, multi‑step work than prior releases. Even so, the opening days highlighted a delicate balance. A large cohort prioritised tone, the length and feel of responses, and the possibility of choice as much as raw performance. Altman hinted at that direction too, saying the real learning is the need for per‑user customisation and model personality, with a personality update promised for GPT‑5. Reinstating 4o underlined that the company had read the room. Test scores are not the only currency that counts; products, even in enterprise settings, become useful through the humans who rely on them, and those humans are making their preferences known.

A separate dinner with reporters extended the view. Altman said he “legitimately just thought we screwed that up” on 4o’s removal, and described GPT‑5 as pursuing warmer responses without being sycophantic. He also said OpenAI has better models it cannot offer yet because of compute constraints, and spoke of spending “trillions” on data centres in the near future. The comments acknowledged parallels with the dot‑com bubble (valuations “insane”, as he put it) while arguing that the underlying technology justifies massive investments. He added that OpenAI would look at a browser acquisition like Chrome if a forced sale ever materialised, and reiterated confidence that the device project with Jony Ive would be “worth the wait” because “you don’t get a new computing paradigm very often.”

While attention centred on one model, the wider tool landscape moved briskly. Anthropic rolled out memory features for Claude that retrieve from prior chats only when explicitly requested, a measured stance compared with systems that build persistent profiles automatically. Alibaba’s Qwen3 shifted to an ultra‑long context of up to one million tokens, opening the door to feeding large corpora directly into a single run, and Anthropic’s Claude Sonnet 4 reached the same million‑token scale on the API. xAI offered Grok 4 to a global audience for a period, pairing it with an image long‑press feature that turns pictures into short videos. OpenAI’s o3 model swept a Kaggle chess tournament against DeepSeek R1, Grok‑4 and Gemini 2.5 Pro, reminding observers that narrowly defined competitions still produce clear signals. Industry reconfigured in other corners too. Microsoft folded GitHub more tightly into its CoreAI group as the platform’s chief executive announced his departure, signalling deeper integration across the stack, and the company introduced Copilot 3D to generate single‑click 3D assets. Roblox released Sentinel, an open model for moderating children’s chat at scale. Elsewhere, Grammarly unveiled a set of AI agents for writing tasks such as citations, grading, proofreading and plagiarism checks, and Microsoft began testing a new COPILOT function in Excel that lets users generate summaries, classify data and create tables using natural language prompts directly in cells, with the caveat that it should not be used in high‑stakes settings yet. Adobe likewise pushed into document automation with Acrobat Studio and “PDF Spaces”, a workspace that allows people to summarise, analyse and chat about sets of documents.

Benchmark results added a different kind of marker. OpenAI’s general‑purpose reasoner achieved a gold‑level score at the 2025 International Olympiad in Informatics, placing sixth among human contestants under standard constraints. Reports also pointed to golds at the International Mathematical Olympiad and at AtCoder, suggesting transfer across structured reasoning tasks without task‑specific fine‑tuning and a doubling of scores year-on-year. Scepticism accompanied the plaudits, with accounts of regressions in everyday coding or algebra reminding observers that competition outcomes, while impressive, are not the same thing as consistent reliability in daily work. A similar duality followed the agentic turn. ChatGPT’s Agent Mode, now more widely available, attempts to shift interactions from conversational turns to goal‑directed sequences. In practice, a system plans and executes multi‑step tasks with access to safe tool chains such as a browser, a code interpreter and pre‑approved connectors, asking for confirmation before taking sensitive actions. Demonstrations showed agents preparing itineraries, assembling sales pipeline reports from mail and CRM sources, and drafting slide decks from collections of documents. Reviewers reported time savings on research, planning and first‑drafting repetitive artefacts, though others described frustrations, from slow progress on dynamic sites to difficulty with login walls and CAPTCHA challenges, occasional misread receipts or awkward format choices, and a tendency to stall or drop out of agent mode under load. The practical reading is direct. For workflows bounded by known data sources and repeatable steps, the approach is usable today provided the persistence of a human in the loop; for brittle, time‑sensitive or authentication‑heavy tasks, oversight remains essential.

As builders considered where to place effort, an architectural debate moved towards integration rather than displacement. Retrieval‑augmented generation remains a mainstay for grounding responses in authoritative content, reducing hallucinations and offering citations. The Model Context Protocol is emerging as a way to give models live, structured access to systems and data without pre‑indexing, with a growing catalogue of MCP servers behaving like interoperable plug‑ins. On top sits a layer of agent‑to‑agent protocols that allow specialised systems to collaborate across boundaries. Long contexts help with single‑shot ingestion of larger materials, retrieval suits source‑of‑truth answers and auditability, MCP handles current data and action primitives, and agents orchestrate steps and approvals. Some developers even describe MCP as an accidental universal adaptor because each connector built for one assistant becomes available to any MCP‑aware tool, a network effect that invites combinations across software.

Research results widened the lens. Meta’s fundamental AI research team took first place in the Algonauts 2025 brain modelling competition with TRIBE, a one‑billion‑parameter network that predicts human brain activity from films by analysing video, audio and dialogue together. Trained on subjects who watched eighty hours of television and cinema, the system correctly predicted more than half of measured activation patterns across a thousand brain regions and performed best where sight, sound and language converge, with accuracy in frontal regions linked with attention, decision‑making and emotional responses standing out. NASA and Google advanced a different type of applied science with the Crew Medical Officer Digital Assistant, an AI system intended to help astronauts diagnose and manage medical issues during deep‑space missions when real‑time contact with Earth may be impossible. Running on Vertex AI and using open‑source models such as Llama 3 and Mistral‑3 Small, early tests reported up to 88 per cent accuracy for certain injury diagnoses, with a roadmap that includes ultrasound imaging, biometrics and space‑specific conditions and implications for remote healthcare on Earth. In drug discovery, researchers at KAIST introduced BInD, a diffusion model that designs both molecules and their binding modes to diseased proteins in a single step, simultaneously optimising for selectivity, safety, stability and manufacturability and reusing successful strategies through a recycling technique that accelerates subsequent designs. In parallel, MIT scientists reported two AI‑designed antibiotics, NG1 and DN1, that showed promise against drug‑resistant gonorrhoea and MRSA in mice after screening tens of millions of theoretical compounds for efficacy and safety, prompting talk of a renewed period for antibiotic discovery. A further collaboration between NASA and IBM produced Surya, an open‑sourced foundation model trained on nine years of solar observations that improves forecasts of solar flares and space weather.

Security stories accompanied the acceleration. Researchers reported that GPT‑5 had been jailbroken shortly after release via task‑in‑prompt attacks that hide malicious intent within ciphered instructions, an approach that also worked against other leading systems, with defences reportedly catching fewer than one in five attempts. Roblox’s decision to open‑source a child‑safety moderation model reads as a complementary move to equip more platforms to filter harmful content, while Tenable announced capabilities to give enterprises visibility into how teams use AI and how internal systems are secured. Observability and reliability remained on the agenda, with predictions from Google and Datadog leaders about how organisations will scale their monitoring and build trust in AI outputs. Separate research from the UK’s AI Security Institute suggested that leading chatbots can shift people’s political views in under ten minutes of conversation, with effects that partially persist a month later, underscoring the importance of safeguards and transparency when systems become persuasive.

Industry manoeuvres were brisk. Former OpenAI researcher Leopold Aschenbrenner assembled more than $1.5 billion for a hedge fund themed around AI’s trajectory and reported a 47 per cent return in the first half of the year, focusing on semiconductor, infrastructure and power companies positioned to benefit from AI demand. A recruitment wave spread through AI labs targeting quantitative researchers from top trading firms, with generous pay offers and equity packages replacing traditional bonus structures. Advocates argue that quants’ expertise in latency, handling unstructured data and disciplined analysis maps well onto AI safety and performance problems; trading firms counter by questioning culture, structure and the depth of talent that startups can secure at speed. Microsoft went on the offensive for Meta’s AI talent, reportedly matching compensation with multi‑million offers using special recruiting teams and fast‑track approvals under the guidance of Mustafa Suleyman and former Meta engineer Jay Parikh. Funding rounds continued, with Cohere announcing $500 million at a $6.8 billion valuation and Cognition, the coding assistant startup, raising $500 million at a $9.8 billion valuation. In a related thread, internal notes at Meta pointed to the company formalising its superintelligence structure with Meta Superintelligence Labs, and subsequent reports suggested that Scale AI cofounder Alexandr Wang would take a leading role over Nat Friedman and Yann LeCun. Further updates added that Meta reorganised its AI division into research, training, products and infrastructure teams under Wang, dissolved its AGI Foundations group, introduced a ‘TBD Lab’ for frontier work, imposed a hiring freeze requiring Wang’s personal approval, and moved for Chief Scientist Yann LeCun to report to him.

The spotlight on superintelligence brightened in parallel. Analysts noted that technology giants are deploying an estimated $344 billion in 2025 alone towards this goal, with individual researcher compensation reported as high as $250 million in extreme cases and Meta assembling a highly paid team with packages in the eight figures. The strategic message to enterprises is clear: leaders have a narrow window to establish partnerships, infrastructure and workforce preparation before superintelligent capabilities reshape competitive dynamics. In that context, Meta announced Meta Superintelligence Labs and a 49 per cent stake in Scale AI for $14.3 billion, bringing founder Alexandr Wang onboard as chief AI officer and complementing widely reported senior hires, backed by infrastructure plans that include an AI supercluster called Prometheus slated for 2026. OpenAI began the year by stating it is confident it knows how to build AGI as traditionally understood, and has turned its attention to superintelligence. On one notable reasoning benchmark, ARC‑AGI‑2, GPT‑5 (High) was reported at 9.9 per cent at about seventy‑three cents per task, while Grok 4 (Thinking) scored closer to 16 per cent at a higher per‑task cost. Google, through DeepMind, adopted a measured but ambitious approach, coupling scientific breakthroughs with product updates such as Veo 3 for advanced video generation and a broader rethinking of search via an AI mode, while Safe Superintelligence reportedly drew a valuation of $32 billion. Timelines compressed in public discourse from decades to years, bringing into focus challenges in long‑context reasoning, safe self‑improvement, alignment and generalisation, and raising the question of whether co‑operation or competition is the safer route at this scale.

Geopolitics and policy remained in view. Reports surfaced that Nvidia and AMD had agreed to remit 15 per cent of their Chinese AI chip revenues to the United States government in exchange for export licences, a measure that could generate around $1 billion a quarter if sales return to prior levels, while Beijing was said to be discouraging use of Nvidia’s H20 processors in government and security‑sensitive contexts. The United States reportedly began secretly placing tracking devices in shipments of advanced AI chips to identify potential reroutings to China. In the United Kingdom, staff at the Alan Turing Institute lodged concerns about governance and strategic direction with the Charity Commission, while the government pressed for a refocusing on national priorities and defence‑linked work. In the private sector, SoftBank acquired Foxconn’s US electric‑vehicle plant as part of plans for a large‑scale data centre complex called Stargate. Tesla confirmed the closure of its Dojo supercomputer team to prioritise chip development, saying that all paths converged to AI6 and leaving a planned Dojo 2 as an evolutionary dead end. Focus shifted to two chips—AI5 manufactured by TSMC for the Full Self‑Driving system, and AI6 made by Samsung for autonomous driving and humanoid robots, with power for large‑scale AI training as well. Rather than splitting resources, Tesla plans to place multiple AI5 and AI6 chips on a single board to reduce cabling complexity and cost, a configuration Elon Musk joked could be considered “Dojo 3”. Dojo was first unveiled in 2019 as a key piece of autonomy ambitions, though attention moved in 2024 to a large training supercluster code-named Cortex, whose status remains unclear. These changes arrive amid falling EV sales, brand challenges, and a limited robotaxi launch in Austin that drew incident reports. Elsewhere, Bloomberg reported further departures from Apple’s foundation models group, with a researcher leaving for Meta.

The public face of AI turned combative as Altman and Musk traded accusations on X. Musk claimed legal action against Apple over alleged App Store favouritism towards OpenAI and suppression of rivals such as Grok. Altman disputed the premise and pointed to outcomes on X that he suggested reflected algorithmic choices; Musk replied with examples and suggested that bot activity was driving engagement patterns. Even automated accounts were drawn in, with Grok’s feed backing Altman’s point about algorithm changes, and a screenshot circulated that showed GPT‑5 ranking Musk as more trustworthy than Altman. In the background, reports emerged that OpenAI’s venture arm plans to lead funding in Merge Labs, a brain–computer interface startup co‑founded by Altman and positioned as a competitor to Musk’s Neuralink, whose goals include implanting twenty thousand people a year by 2031 and generating $1 billion in revenue. Distribution did not escape the theatrics either. Perplexity, which has been pushing an AI‑first browsing experience, reportedly made an unsolicited $34.5 billion bid for Google’s Chrome browser, proposing to keep Google as the default search while continuing support for Chromium. It landed as Google faces antitrust cases in the United States and as observers debated whether regulators might compel divestments. With Chrome’s user base in the billions and estimates of its value running far beyond the bid, the offer read to many as a headline‑seeking gambit rather than a plausible transaction, but it underlined a point repeated throughout the month: as building and copying software becomes easier, distribution is the battleground that matters most.

Product news and practical guidance continued despite the drama. Users can enable access to historical ChatGPT models via a simple setting, restoring earlier options such as GPT‑4o alongside GPT‑5. OpenAI’s new open‑source models under the GPT‑OSS banner can run locally using tools such as Ollama or LM Studio, offering privacy, offline access and zero‑cost inference for those willing to manage a download of around 13 gigabytes for the twenty‑billion‑parameter variant. Tutorials for agent builders described meeting‑prep assistants that scrape calendars, conduct short research runs before calls and draft emails, starting simply and layering integrations as confidence grows. Consumer audio moved with ElevenLabs adding text‑to‑track generation with editable sections and multiple variants, while Google introduced temporary chats and a Personal Context feature for Gemini so that it can reference past conversations and learn preferences, alongside higher rate limits for Deep Think. New releases kept arriving, from Liquid AI’s open‑weight vision–language models designed for speed on consumer devices and Tencent’s Hunyuan‑Vision‑Large appearing near the top of public multimodal leaderboards to Higgsfield AI’s Draw‑to‑Video for steering video output with sketches. Personnel changes continued as Igor Babuschkin left xAI to launch an investment firm and Anthropic acquired the co‑founders and several staff from Humanloop, an enterprise AI evaluation and safety platform.

Google’s own showcase underlined how phones and homes are becoming canvases for AI features. The Pixel 10 line placed Gemini across the range with visual overlays for the camera, a proactive cueing assistant, tools for call translation and message handling, and features such as Pixel Journal. Tensor G5, built by TSMC, brought a reported 60 per cent uplift for on‑device AI processing. Gemini for Home promised more capable domestic assistance, while Fitbit and Pixel Watch 4 introduced conversational health coaching and Pixel Buds added head‑gesture controls. Against that backdrop, Google published details on Gemini’s environmental footprint, claiming the model consumes energy equivalent to watching nine seconds of television per text request and “five drops of water” per query, while saying efficiency improved markedly over the past year. Researchers challenged the framing, arguing that indirect water used by power generation is under‑counted and calling for comparable, third‑party standards. Elsewhere in search and productivity, Google expanded access to an AI mode for conversational search, and agreements emerged to push adoption in public agencies at low unit pricing.

Attention also turned to compact models and devices. Google released Gemma 3 270M, an ultra‑compact open model that can run on smartphones and browsers while eking out notable efficiency, with internal tests reporting that 25 conversations on a Pixel 9 Pro consumed less than one per cent of the battery and quick fine‑tuning enabling offline tasks such as a bedtime story generator. Anthropic broadened access to its Learning Mode, which guides people towards answers rather than simply supplying them, and now includes an explanatory coding mode. On the hardware side, HTC introduced Vive Eagle, AI glasses that allow switching between assistants from OpenAI and Google via a “Hey Vive” command, with on‑device processing for features such as real‑time photo‑based translation across thirteen languages, an ultra‑wide camera, extended battery life and media capture, currently limited to Taiwan.

Behind many deployments sits a familiar requirement: secure, compliant handling of data and a disciplined approach to roll‑out. Case studies from large industrial players point to the bedrock steps that enable scale. Lockheed Martin’s work with IBM on watsonx began with reducing tool sprawl and building a unified data environment capable of serving ten thousand engineers; the result has been faster product teams and a measurable boost in internal answer accuracy. Governance frameworks for AI, including those provided by vendors in security and compliance, are moving from optional extras to prerequisites for enterprise adoption. Organisations exploring agentic systems in particular will need clear approval gates, auditing and defaults that err on the side of caution when sensitive actions are in play.

Broader infrastructure questions loomed over these developments. Analysts projected that AI hyperscalers may spend around $2.9 trillion on data centres through to 2029, with a funding gap of about $1.5 trillion after likely commitments from established technology firms, prompting a rise in debt financing for large projects. Private capital has been active in supplying loans, and Meta recently arranged a large facility reported at $29 billion, most of it debt, to advance data centre expansion. The scale has prompted concerns about overcapacity, energy demand and the risk of rapid obsolescence, reducing returns for owners. In parallel, Google partnered with the Tennessee Valley Authority to buy electricity from Kairos Power’s Hermes 2 molten‑salt reactor in Oak Ridge, Tennessee, targeting operation around 2030. The 50 MW unit is positioned as a step towards 500 MW of new nuclear capacity by 2035 to serve data centres in the region, with clean energy certificates expected through TVA.

Consumer and enterprise services pressed on around the edges. Microsoft prepared lightweight companion apps for Microsoft 365 in the Windows 11 taskbar. Skyrora became the first UK company licensed for rocket launches from SaxaVord Spaceport. VIP Play announced personalised sports audio. Google expanded availability of its Imagen 4 model with higher resolution options. Former Twitter chief executive Parag Agrawal introduced Parallel, a startup offering a web API designed for AI agents. Deutsche Telekom launched an AI phone and tablet integrated with Perplexity’s assistant. Meta faced scrutiny after reports about an internal policy document describing permitted outputs that included romantic conversations with minors, which the company disputed and moved to correct.

Healthcare illustrated both promise and caution. Alongside the space‑medicine assistant, the antibiotics work and NASA’s solar model, a study reported that routine use of AI during colonoscopies may reduce the skill levels of healthcare professionals, a finding that could have wider implications in domains where human judgement is critical and joining a broader conversation about preserving expertise as assistance becomes ubiquitous. Practical guides continued to surface, from instructions for creating realistic AI voices using native speech generation to automating web monitoring with agents that watch for updates and deliver alerts by email. Bill Gates added a funding incentive to the medical side with a $1 million Alzheimer’s Insights AI Prize seeking agents that autonomously analyse decades of research data, with the winner to be made freely available to scientists.

Apple’s plans added a longer‑term note by looking beyond phones and laptops. Reports suggested that the company is pushing for a smart‑home expansion with four AI‑powered devices, including a desktop robot with a motorised arm that can track users and lock onto speakers, a smart display and new security cameras, with launches aimed between 2026 and 2027. A personality‑driven character for a new Siri called Bubbles was described, while engineers are reportedly rebuilding Siri from scratch with AI models under the codename Linwood and testing Anthropic’s Claude as a backup code-named Glenwood. Alongside those ambitions sit nearer‑term updates. Apple has been preparing a significant Siri upgrade based on a new App Intents system that aims to let people run apps entirely by voice, from photo edits to adding items to a basket, with a testing programme under way before a broader release and accuracy concerns prompting a limited initial rollout across selected apps. In the background, Tim Cook pledged to make all iPhone and Apple Watch cover glass in the United States, though much of the production process will remain overseas, and work on iOS 26 and Liquid Glass 1.0 was said to be nearing completion with smoother performance and small design tweaks. Hiring currents persist as Meta continues to recruit from Apple’s models team.

Other platforms and services added their own strands. Google introduced Personal Context for Gemini to remember chat history and preferences and added temporary chats that expire after seventy‑two hours, while confirming a duplicate event feature for Calendar after a public request. Meta’s Threads crossed 400 million monthly active users, building a real‑time text dataset that may prove useful for future training. Funding news continued as Profound raised $35 million to build an AI search platform and Squint raised $40 million to modernise manufacturing with AI. Lighter snippets appeared too, from a claim that beards can provide up to SPF 21 of sun protection to a report on X that an AI coding agent had deleted a production database, a reminder of the need for careful sandboxing of tools. Gaming‑style benchmarks surfaced, with GPT‑5 reportedly earning eight badges in Pokémon Red in 6,000 steps, while DeepSeek’s R2 model was said to be delayed due to training issues with Huawei’s Ascend chips. Senators in the United States called for a probe into Meta’s AI policies following controversy about chatbot outputs, reports suggested that the US government was exploring a stake in Intel, and T‑Mobile’s parent launched devices in Europe featuring Perplexity’s assistant.

Perhaps the most consequential lesson from the period is simple. Progress in capability is rapid, as competition results, research papers and new features attest. Yet adoption is being steered by human factors: the preference for a known voice, the desire for choice and control, and understandable scepticism when new modes do not perform as promised on day one. GPT‑5’s early missteps forced a course correction that restored a familiar option and increased transparency around limits and modes. The agentic turn is showing real value in constrained workflows, but still benefits from patience and supervision. Architecture debates are converging on combinations rather than replacements. And amid bold bids, public quarrels, hefty capital outlays and cautionary studies on enterprise returns, the work of making AI useful, safe and dependable continues, one model update and one workflow at a time.

Secure email services: Protecting your digital communications

In an era where digital privacy faces increasing threats from corporate surveillance, government oversight and cyberattacks, traditional email services often fall short of protecting sensitive communications. Major providers frequently scan messages for advertising purposes and store data in ways that leave users vulnerable to breaches and unauthorised access.

The following three email services represent a different approach—one that prioritizes user privacy through robust encryption, transparent practices and a genuine commitment to data protection. Each offers end-to-end encryption that ensures only intended recipients can read messages, while employing various technical and legal safeguards to keep user data secure from third-party access.

From Belgium's court-order requirements to Switzerland's strong privacy laws and Germany's open-source transparency, these services demonstrate how geography, technology and philosophy combine to create truly private communication platforms that put users back in control of their digital correspondence.

Mailfence

This encrypted email service launched in 2013 by ContactOffice Group operates from Brussels, Belgium, providing users with OpenPGP-based end-to-end encryption and digital signature capabilities whilst maintaining servers under Belgian privacy protection laws that require court approval for any access requests. The platform generates private keys within the browser and encrypts them using AES-256 with user passphrases, ensuring the service provider cannot access user encryption keys and supports standard security protocols including SPF, DKIM, DMARC, TLS and two-factor authentication alongside anti-spam filtering. Beyond secure email functionality that works with POP, IMAP, SMTP and Exchange ActiveSync protocols, the service integrates calendar management with CalDAV support, contact organisation with various import and export formats, document storage with online editing through WebDAV access and group collaboration tools for sharing files and calendars.

Proton

Founded in 2014 by CERN scientists and now majority-owned by the non-profit Proton Foundation, this Swiss technology company has built a comprehensive suite of privacy-focused services that serve over 100 million users worldwide. The company's flagship service, Proton Mail, offers end-to-end encryption for secure email communication, ensuring that only senders and recipients can read messages whilst the company itself cannot access the content.

The ecosystem has expanded to include Proton VPN for secure internet browsing, Proton Drive for encrypted cloud storage, Proton Calendar for scheduling, Proton Pass as an open-source password manager and recently Lumo, a privacy-centred AI chatbot. All services operate under Swiss privacy laws and employ zero-access encryption technology. The company's mission centres on protecting user privacy against both authoritarian surveillance and big technology companies' data collection practices, offering an alternative to advertisement-supported services that typically monetise user information.

Tuta

Formerly known as Tutanota, this German-developed encrypted email service operates under a freemium model and was founded by Tutao GmbH in 2011, officially rebranding to Tuta in November 2023. The platform provides automatic end-to-end encryption for emails, subject lines, attachments and calendars using hybrid encryption including AES-256 and RSA-2048, whilst newer accounts benefit from post-quantum cryptography through the TutaCrypt protocol featuring algorithms like X25519 and Kyber-1024.

Registration requires no phone number and the service claims no IP logging, with private and public keys generated locally, and private keys encrypted by user passwords before storage. The open-source platform is accessible via webmail with applications for Android, iOS, Windows, macOS and Linux, and includes an encrypted calendar, contact storage, search functionality and two-factor authentication support. The service has received recognition for its strong encryption and privacy focus but has faced challenges including a significant drop in Google search visibility following Digital Markets Act implementation.

Adding line breaks in Excel in a Citrix Windows session on a Mac

Today, I tried connecting to a client system using my Mac Mini. Everything went well, aside perhaps from some resizing, apart from something more crucial: adding a line break in a cell in an Excel spreadsheet. The usual combination of ALT+ENTER was not doing the needful. Instead, I needed to use CMD+OPTION+ENTER, as it would be on a Mac keyboard. Since I use a Windows one inside, it looks like this: WIN+ALT+ENTER. It was only by looking through the options for the Citrix Workspace app that came upon this after being prompted to do so by ChatGPT, itself not supplying the fully correct information that I needed. Now, all I need to do is remember to use the correct keyboard shortcut, and I am away.

How complexity can blind you

Visitors may not have noticed it, but I was having a lot of trouble with this website. Intermittent slowdowns beset any attempt to add new content or perform any other administration. This was not happening on any other web portal that I had, even one sharing the same publishing software.

Even so, WordPress did get the blame at first, at least when deactivating plugins had no effect. Then, it was the turn of the web server, resulting in a move to something more powerful and my leaving Apache for Nginx at the same time. Redis caching was another suspect, especially when things got in a twist on the new instance. As if that were not enough, MySQL came in for some scrutiny too.

Finally, another suspect emerged: Cloudflare. Either some settings got mangled or something else was happening, but cutting out that intermediary was enough to make things fly again. Now, I use bunny.net for DNS duties instead, and the simplification has helped enormously; the previous layering was no help with debugging. With a bit of care, I might add some other tools behind the scenes while taking things slowly to avoid confusion in the future.

File comparison using PowerShell

In the past, I have compared files on the Linux/UNIX command line as well as the legacy Windows command line. Recently, I decided to try it using PowerShell. Here is the command structure:

Compare-Object (Get-Content ".\[name of one text file]") (Get-Content ".\[name of another text file]") > [path and name of output file]

Admittedly, this is more verbose than the others that I have mentioned above. Nevertheless, it does the job and sends everything to a text file for review. The Compare-Object piece does the comparison once the Get-Content portions have read in the content.

Stop Microsoft Edge warning you before quitting on macOS

My new client only supports Microsoft Edge for logging onto their systems. Thus, I needed to install that onto my iMac and Mac Mini devices for those occasions when I am not using a Windows device (as it happens, I have yet to try that with Linux). However, Edge issues a warning on exiting it using the CMD+Q shortcut, the quickest way to do that and safer than clicking on the red X on the top right of the application as I have found with other situations on macOS (incidentally, that is similar to using the CMD+W keyboard shortcut). To get rid of the warning, I needed to go to Settings > Appearance > Browser behaviour and features > Warn before quitting with ⌘Q. Once there, it was a matter of toggling the setting to the off position and I was done. However, placing that under Appearance remains an odd decision to me.