Adventures & experiences in contemporary technology
If a certain Robert Stallman had his way, Linux would be called GNU/Linux but we’re lazy creatures and we all call it Linux instead. What still amazes me is the number of Linux distributions that there are out there. Over the years, some have come and others have gone so the list is going to be a living one.
For several years, things had grown fairly static and it was tempting to think that Linux had developed a certain maturity. At the time of writing, it has passed its twentieth birthday and some things still show no sign of settling down even if other things have. In many ways, that is no bad thing at all.
One of these is the world of desktop environments. A few years ago, KDE went with what then was seen as a radical change that attracted much adverse comment, largely because of a loss of stability. No sooner has that been regained that GNOME went for its transformation with no loss of robustness. However, the change in the way that things worked has not gone down well with many and the project has been facing a KDE 4.0 moment for a while now. Those who disfavour upheavals are having a bumpy time of it though technology would be dull without some changes. It’s a matter of having an open mind, finding what suits and going on a voyage of rediscovery when a change in what you already use is not to your taste.
Another change is that Debian now has both Linux and FreeBSD variants. That’s great from the standpoint of choice and means that it doesn’t appear in this list anymore. For now, it gets its page and might be joined on there by Gentoo if their FreeBSD efforts reach fruition. For other BSD UNIX distros, there’s the UNIX operating system page. So far, these seem to be keeping away from the Linux kernel even if they draw on other developments in their counterpart’s world.
Some of the comments you find against entries in the list below are drawn from my personal experiences. There are so many distributions on offer at the moment that I cannot try every single one. What I do instead is to look at the more interesting or commonly used ones. Of course, having virtual machine technology and a spare PC allows me to run more than one at once. Of course, it is the one that gets onto my main home PC that gets the most use and that doesn’t get changed so often. Others may not see me spending as much time with them but any views expressed here are based on whatever I find.
After having a completely alphabetical list, I have decided to separate the entries into various categories. Some are functional in that they specialise in ensuring privacy or will run on older machines. One heading is philosophical in that it relates to the idea of liberty as it applies to software usage. Beyond those, distros are classified according to their basis: Arch, Debian, Fedora, Gentoo or Slackware. In the end, we have those that fall into no other category.
Not all software in Linux distributions necessarily is free or libre software. After all, most of us want to play MP3 files or view web pages with Adobe Flash objects embedded in them and I am as guilty of this as many. Then, some proprietary drivers are included with some of them baked into Linux kernels also. All of this may make Linux easier to use but it will not please some. Hence, the Free Software Foundation have a list of distros satisfying their guidelines and some of these are below.
Simplicity is the apparent hallmark here.
This is a free software compliant multimedia distro that proves that such things can be done without the use of proprietary codecs.
This results from the combination of two distinct projects that shared one common characteristic: use in embedded devices like routers, not for installing on PC’s. That may seem like a minority interest to me but we all have different needs.
The website is in Spanish but this is a distro for musicians, as the name might apply. It apparently is based on Debian and Knoppix.
What we have here is another Linux distro that can be embedded on different devices and is kept lightweight to ensure universality.
Think of this as Ubuntu with only Free Software included and you have the point of this distro. Given that Robert Stallman of the FSF likes it, meeting that goal seems to be assured now.
The controversy about security agencies eavesdropping on internet communications has upset some and here are some distros offering anonymity and privacy. Of course, none of these should be used for unlawful purposes since there are those in less liberal countries who need invisibility to speak their minds.
This is an option for those who are worried about being tracked online. All internet connections are sent via the Tor network and it is run exclusively as a live distro from CD, DVD or USB stick drive too so no trace is left on any PC. The basis is Debian 6 and the distro’s name is an acronym: The Amnesiac Incognito Live System. For us living in a democratic country, the effort may seem excessive but that changes in other places where folk are not so fortunate. The use of Tor may not be perfect but it should help in conjunction with the use of different sessions for different tasks and encrypting any files. There even is an option to make the desktop appear like that of Windows XP for extra discreteness of use.
Most Linux distros that have enhanced security and anonymity as a feature are not installable on a PC but that exactly is what’s unique about Whonix. It’s based on Debian but all internet connections go via the Tor network. The latter is called Whonix-Gateway with Whonix-Workstation being what you use to work on your system. It may sound like being overly careful but it has me intrigued.
For a long time, I was under the impression that anything catering for Network Assisted Storage servers either came with the devices or was based on BSD. A review in Linux Voice changed that understanding and a spare PC was set up with one of the options below. Previously, I had tried FreeNAS with no success because the installation CD’s that I had made would not boot up the machine for whatever reason.
This is based on OpenSUSE and it displays its reason for existence in its name. Thankfully, it is as easy to use as it intends to be.
This largely is a commercial offering though there is a community edition as well. Support for the latter apparently is lacking, which tells its own story.
After positive comments from Linux Voice, I went and gave this a go. It is based on Debian so there was a certain familiarity with the underpinnings anyway. Once I had watched a video on YouTube, the interface became clearer and I was able to get it to work as it should. There are plugins too so functionality can be extended with the likes of ownCloud and other tools. OMV-EXTRAS.ORG has a good selection that adds to the ones included in the standard installation.
Now, the next steps are to make the guinea pig PC quieter (the power supply fan is not quiet and the noise coming from the CPU one may be apparent too) and maybe give it a much bigger hard drive than the 320 GB one that I have been using for testing. Cutting down power usage would be another possibility.
It may sell itself more as being a cloud server but it also can act as a NAS too and it is good to have a range of possibilities. The file system is BTRFS rather than EXT4, which normally is used with Linux, but that is done with the intent of offering features comparable to ZFS for more solid file storage.
It is the File Server variant that would power a NAS but it does look like that is a lot of interesting other possibilities available from the website; there are ones for WordPress, Drupal and Joomla!, for instance. Debian is the basis for this one too.
While computer hardware gets ever more capable, it is easy for software developers to use all that power and leave those on older machines behind. That probably has been the driver for what you find below and there also is the added option of portability too if you wish to boot up a public computer with your own Linux operating system.
The acronym means Damn Small Linux and it essentially is a derivative of Debian shrunk to fit within 50 MB. That it’s intended for older computers or those without much in the way of processing power goes without saying.
A lightweight 64-bit Linux operating is what this project intends to give to the world.
Portability is the unique selling point for Porteus because it is intended to be a lightweight installation that you carry around with you on a CD, DVD or USB Flash Drive. The claim is that it boots in around 15 seconds, which is impressive if that’s the reality.
Though there are heavyweight Linux distros that need reasonably up to date hardware, this is one of the better-known options for older machines that will cope with the likes of GNOME Shell or KDE. It is based on Slackware and has been streamlined for its intended purpose.
Not to be content with offering a distro for desktop use on slower systems, they also include servers as a usage option. Needing only 48 MB of RAM and 35 MB of disk space looks very impressive these days and means that a 15-year-old PC need not be consigned to recycling just yet.
Linux developers want to have a hand in creating bare-bones distros that will run on practically anything and here’s another example whose size is measured in megabytes and not gigabytes. The numbers quoted on the website do not even exceed 10 MB so many appliances could make use of this along with the usual desktop and server PC’s.
This sounds like a stripped out version of Debian and it once used Ubuntu as its basis. Usage of memory and other computing resources is a watchword with this one, especially with its Microwatt edition and there are LXDE and MATE versions too.
Debian is conspicuous by its absence here since it has its place on this website because there is a BSD UNIX variant to go alongside the monger standing Linux one. Nevertheless, so many other distros are based on it that there needs to be a list of them. Ubuntu and Linux Mint are the most notable of the derivatives but there are many others as you will see here. To reduce duplication, anything in the more functional listings above is excluded below.
An up and coming Ubuntu derivative that uses the Enlightenment desktop environment.
This is another derivative of Ubuntu that is gaining favour thanks to the elegance of its desktop. That it’s essentially GNOME 3 is saying something about how GNOME Shell can be customised too.
The name may be odd but this is a variant of Debian with the MATE desktop environment. However, it isn’t a remixing of the production repository but rather the feedstock that is used to assemble new versions of Debian too.
It has Ubuntu at its heart but a lot of work has happened to make it feel as if that isn’t the case.
This is a remix of Debian that uses the Zsh shell that runs exclusively as a live distro, either on a DC or on a USB flash drive.
This appears to be a German Debian variant that uses KDE as its desktop environment. It gets the latest version of Iceweasel (think Firebox without the proprietary branding) by default as well and without any extra effort needed on the part of a user.
If I remember correctly, this was the first-ever distribution to offer a Live CD version of itself and the innovation has taken off to the level that almost all of its competitors now offer the same. Its creator also writes a helpdesk column for Linux Magazine.
Until the 12.04, release this was sponsored by Canonical but that has changed with Blue Systems taking over for the 12.10 release. It remains the KDE flavour of Ubuntu despite this and that seems to remain the case for the foreseeable future.
As the name suggests, thus Ubuntu variant is suitable for older computer hardware. Also, it is based on LTS releases of Ubuntu so there is no need to upgrade every six months either.
After a few years with Ubuntu, the advent of 11.04 with its Unity desktop environment had me thinking that we were getting what Canonical thought was right for us instead of what we might have wanted. After sticking it out with Ubuntu 10.10, I decided on migration to Linux Mint 11 over the Easter weekend. That promised more evolution than revolution and seems to be a community-driven operation. Unity was rejected and a more standard GNOME 2 desktop in the style to which Linux Mint users had become accustomed was the offer.
Linux Mint 12 brought a move to GNOME 3 but it happened on its terms. Using extensions, they have made GNOME Shell look not dissimilar to the desktop that which graced Linux Mint 11 or even the LXDE variant of the distribution. This answered my question as to what could be done with GNOME by distribution projects but only for a while. The Cinnamon desktop environment was brought into being is, along with Mate (itself a fork of GNOME 2), the favoured desktop environment since Linux Mint 13. Nothing stops you from adding GNOME Shell and tricking it out to suit yourself though. After all, that is what I have done.
The main distro may be based on Ubuntu but there is a Debian-based rolling version too. When you consider that the main Linux Mint distribution upgrade recommendation is to do a backup and a fresh installation with software reinstatement, it may seem a surprising course for the project to take. Having a non-Ubuntu basis may be playing safe for the future though. Because of the rolling nature of LMDE, I did try it out and found that this is something that needs fine-tuning; their servers were overloaded following the release of a major update and it was either a case of waiting or defeating the object by going for a DVD installation. Otherwise, it worked smoothly while I was investigating it. However, the upgrade debacle has forestalled any ideas of replacing the Ubuntu-based mainstream variant.
As well as the rolling LMDE that comes in GNOME and Xfce versions, Linux Mint also has Ubuntu-based LXDE, Xfce and KDE (this is not a Kubuntu clone by the way; the KDE integration was done by the Linux Mint folks) variants. The Xfce variant is running on my Asus Eee netbook and, along with the LXDE one, it’s a more lightweight option for less powerful machines. It works very well and there’s nothing to stop you from adding more heavyweight software because it accesses the same repositories as its GNOME cousin. The similarity between LXDE and GNOME 2 makes it easy to find your about too and this desktop environment is such a promising option for those wanting to stick with a more traditional layout that you have to ask if MATE is needed at all.
There’s plenty on offer from Linux Mint and how it has developed is surprising when you realise the size of the team and their resources; the latter became apparent during a major LMDE update when servers couldn’t cope with the load. In contrast to an Ubuntu project that has been infected with delusions of being the apple of the Linux world, Linux Mint is far more community-oriented. That makes it a gentler world than one where you hear about people needing to win arguments.
The first place I ever tried Lubuntu was on my now five-year-old Asus EeePC netbook and it now runs Xubuntu following a dalliance with an LXDE variant of Linux Mint (that project no longer supports this desktop environment option, by the way). LXDE is the desktop environment choice here too and it’s very lightweight and so fits the bill for netbooks and PC’s that are getting on in years. The included software is chosen for being lightweight so Chromium appeared instead of Firefox but the accessibility of Ubuntu repositories meant that LibreOffice and the aforementioned Firefox never took long to appear on where I installed Lubuntu. Originally, it was an independent project but it impressed Mark Shuttleworth enough to gain official support such that new versions now appear on the same day as the main Ubuntu release itself.
Later on, a mishap with an Ubuntu password got it installed on my Toshiba laptop before a hard drive upgrade saw it revert to a dual booting combination of Ubuntu (it’s the LTS so the version is 12.04 and I went about adding on GNOME Shell before ending up moving to Cinnamon from a third-party PPA) and Windows 7. That was no fault of Lubuntu because it does not look dissimilar to GNOME 2 and an extra panel can be added to make it even more of a lookalike too. My only explanation for its ejection must be that I fancied a spot of further experimentation.
It’s only recently that I set it a sterner test: an elderly PC with an AMD Athlon single-core processor and 1 GB of RAM. Lubuntu works on there much better than Sabayon even if browsers (Firefox or Chromium) can cause desktop crashes more frequently than I’d like. That machine may get an upgrade in time but it’s usable as things stand.
Some wonder why we need Lubuntu with this around. It is based on LTS releases of Ubuntu so it escapes that six-monthly cycle and it’s a developing trend with many downstream distros taking a similar approach. Each Linux Mint is taking that tack now.
When Kubuntu existed, the need for this was lost on me but the continued existence of this project will serve those who were left without an option after the official Ubuntu derivative. The effort is sponsored by Blue Systems.
Essentially, this would appear to be a Debian-based distro with the latest version of GNOME in its testing edition; it’s 3.4.2 in the stable release. There are six-monthly updates that are reminiscent of Ubuntu too, especially when you consider that an in situ upgrade can be accomplished using the package management facilities.
What you get here is a prettier alternative to Ubuntu that uses GNOME Shell accessorised with Docky and Conky. The latest version is based on the most recent LTS version of Ubuntu (12.04 at the time of writing) so there’s no rushing you from one release to the next every six months either.
This is a packaging of software from Debian’s unstable branch, always called Sid and so the inspiration for the name of this distro. There are quarterly releases and five desktop environments are on offer, GNOME, LXDE, XFCE, KDE SC and Razor-QT. For whatever reason, there is a version with no desktop environment at all but that might be for the sort of DIY enthusiast who enjoys the likes of Arch.
Using the testing branch of Debian, this rolling release distro comes in E17, LXDE, MATE and Razor-qt flavours. There’s also a command-line edition for those wanting to build their desktop environment instead of having it pre-packaged for them.
Xubuntu (Xfce desktop environment)
With the storm that accompanied the introduction of Unity in 11.04, it’s just as well that Ubuntu comes with several desktops. Though Unity is becoming ever more polished, I have concluded that it isn’t for me and so I have stuck with Linux Mint as the operating system for my main home PC after a few years of using Ubuntu. As it happened, it was Ubuntu that steered me into the world of full-time Linux usage after a series of Windows XP meltdowns. In contrast to earlier dalliances with Linux, all of my hardware was supported without any bother and everything seemed to work straight away. Whatever issues I faced in those early months, there seemed to be an answer in an Ubuntu forum or blog for my problem even if some needed a spot of thought when it came to their implementation.
With all of the noise out there, there must be some who like Unity and it always is those with grievances that shout the loudest anyway. Then, others like me decide to quietly look around them when they are not convinced by what’s coming their way. Alongside the other desktop options, GNOME Shell can be added too and there now is an official variant of Ubuntu with that desktop environment available since last year too.
Ubuntu retains its more specialised editions too. Ubuntu Studio focuses on multimedia needs. To get a nicer looking desktop, I did toy with the former for a while before returning to Ubuntu again. That experience confirmed that video and music editing is part of its functionality though they don’t catch my interest. Everyone differs and we all have our own needs.
While Canonical seems to be learning a thing or two from Apple, choices remain and there are more Ubuntu-based distros than in the mainstream stack. Its open-source roots continue to prevail so the likes of Linux Mint and more like it continue to live on for those wanting to feel in charge of their computing.
In a sense, this is going back to how Ubuntu was before the arrival of GNOME Shell or Unity, both of which have caused controversy, and it is a community effort and not one sponsored by Canonical. With Linux Mint having the MATE desktop too, you might be tempted to ask what this offers but the decision by the Linux Mint team to go exclusively for a long term support model answers that. In contrast, the next release of Ubuntu MATE will be 14.10 so you get an intermediate release this way and in situ distro version updates should be a possibility too, another practice that the Linux Mint team reckons is undesirable. It will be interesting to see how many go for this.
From the website, this would appear to be a mail server operating system that has a user-friendly feel to it. However, Linux Magazine has left me with the impression that its talents go beyond this and that activities like serving websites are supported. These are things that I have yet to explore with the VirtualBox instance that I have set up to see what it can do.
Since there usually isn’t a KDE version of Debian, this has a place. Those wanting a 32-bit option need to look elsewhere though since this is a 64-bit only affair.
Those with more of a do-it-yourself approach to life will value Arch but there are more user-friendly variants too. After all, the pacman command line package manager is one of the best in the world of Linux.
Arch has two main selling points for me. The first is that it is a rolling distribution so six-monthly upheavals are avoided while the second may not appeal to everyone. That is that using Arch is very D.I.Y. in its approach and that means leaving all the choices to you. In an age when GNOME 3 and Unity are causing so much rancour, that can help to quell complaints because you are not constrained by the choices of others or finding the right version of a distribution. Speaking of desktop environments, be warned that this takes a few hours of your time with Arch and needs another computer so that you can search the Arch wiki for the instructions.
The wiki is very good so it’s a case of providing the instructions to users instead of doing the job for them, possibly in a way that some dislike. It is an approach that is educational too and having to work a little for a solid system set-up is no bad thing either because you can look at the results of your efforts with a sense of satisfaction. The distribution may be cutting edge but I have found it to be a solid offering and that comment applies too to software installed from the AUR. Speaking of software installation, this exclusively is a command-line process and pacman works very well as the tool for the job. All in all, this is a distribution for the hobbyist who likes to have solid documentation to advise them of their way.
Some may think Arch an aberration in a world where user-friendliness is king but I was so impressed with it that it replaced Fedora on my secondary home PC. However, an update caused an unrecoverable error in GNOME and I have moved on from it because of that. The laborious installation ended up making me choose something that was quicker to install and the font display seemed to have been an issue in terms of sharpness too. Maybe, I’ll give things another go when I have a bit more time again.
This offering uses Arch as its basis but is vastly more user friendly than the distro on which it is based. For a time, I tried it within a virtual machine but the rolling release updates broke it and I left things there. It remains a work in progress from the stability point so there is wisdom in waiting a little longer to allow it to mature. There are versions with all the usual desktop environments with XFCE and OpenBox editions being those from the main project and community efforts resulting in KDE, GNOME and Cinnamon variants.
When Red Hat decided to keep its name for its lucrative commercial activities, it created the Fedora project to keep community participation going. The predecessor spawned a lot of spin-offs but Fedora does not see much of that now though we do have the following collection alongside the original.
This is a fork of Red Hat Enterprise Linux that is available without charge, a situation allowed through GPL that would end up in the courts if this was proprietary software. Of course, it is the paid support that is the ultimate advantage of its parent and it won’t have that. Another Linux distro focussed on stability does no wrong though.
For a good while, I did have a PC running Fedora until the appeal of running Arch on there grew too strong after an upgrade to Fedora 16 didn’t work out as smoothly as would have been ideal. It’s the native GNOME variant that I used but there are others with KDE, Xfce and LXDE desktops instead. Over time, I managed to figure out its ins and outs as well with getting a web server working on the thing was made more tricky by SELinux even if an acceptable solution was found after quite a search: setting a dedicated user account and changing the SELinux of the account’s home folder was to be the workaround. Things like that are not so user-friendly and Linux Format did say that Fedora 14 wasn’t a beginner option when it reviewed it. Other than the webserver, I was able to make it work for me without spending too many hours doing so. The distribution also is an early adopter of new developments in the world of Linux and GNOME 3 was one of these. A day with Fedora 15 sold GNOME 3 to me and I even added it to my Linux Mint 11 installation on my main home machine later on.
A re-spin of Fedora that is focussed on desktop users. It seems necessary given some of the review comments I have seen about Fedora 19…
The Gentoo family is not a big one. Is that because of the software compiling basis of package installation?
From what I have seen, this project seems to be supporting the same needs as Arch, albeit with all software needing to be compiled so there’s more of a DIY approach. It also is the basis of Sabayon so those wanting to do less tinkering can use that instead. The wiki also comes in handy for those users and I have been led to it a few times by Google Sabayon query.
This is a quasi-rolling release distribution based on Gentoo and software installation is far more user friendly than its parent. After a satisfactory trial on VirtualBox, my secondary home PC became host to the GNOME edition of Sabayon; KDE, MATE and XFCE are other options. The rolling release nature of the distro was an attraction but it didn’t run as smoothly as I’d have liked. Also, the overall update mechanism needs to include kernel upgrades too. While I can see that separating these to avoid system upsets is sensible, the whole distro cannot be fully rolling until they are included in such a way as make those major upgrades seamless to a user. That proved to be a deal-breaker for me when even Ubuntu can make the major upgrades work without any bother. So long as you go for the DVD-based upgrade path every time a new Sabayon version appears, you should be fine but that means it is far from being a rolling release schedule as might have been hoped.
Slackware has been around for a long while now so it is no surprise that other distros have been built on its basis. That these are not in the mainstream of Linux usage is no criticism of them either.
Here is a Slackware-based distro that comes with the following desktop environments: Xfce, MATE, LXDE, Fluxbox, KDE and Ratpoison. It is interesting to see that GNOME has been given a wide berth with MATE included in its stead.
This is a Greek distro that is based on both Slackware and its derivative Salix. KDE and Openbox are the desktop choices for anyone who might be interested.
There’s a saying out there about Slackware being the only distribution that’ll teach you about Linux. For one thing, it certainly has been around since near enough the dawn of Linux and I remember a colleague at The University of Edinburgh using it on one of the institution’s research PC’s. There is a hardcore aspect to the distro so it’s not for beginners and, whatever you do, don’t go expecting any easy way of updating the software that you install on your system.
Along with the longstanding x86, releases (32- and 64-bit, by the way), there’s even an ARM version now. Early in 2012, the distro’s website disappeared because there wasn’t money to address a hardware failure. Thankfully, it’s back online now thanks to the support of its community even if RAM remains an issue on the main server; that’s why a mirror site exists. The way this bump was resolved shows that even more technical variants of Linux have their fans and there’s something to be said for knowing more about the innards of the operating system too.
Whether you are an admirer of Slackware or not, this modular lightweight distro is intended to run on some very old computers. While I have no idea where they might find PC’s from around twenty years ago (Intel 486, anyone?) for testing that Slax runs on them, that hasn’t stopped the project allowing for its wares running on those at all. They even sell a USB stick drive with the software installed on there to fund the project if downloading the files is too much for you.
GNOME 2 lives on as a desktop choice for this distro and there is Openbox too. You also have a choice of editions according to how much your computer can handle and it is based on Slackware too.
Mandrake once was a spin of Red Hat with a more user-friendly focus. In the days before the appearance of Ubuntu, it would have been a choice for those not wanting to overcome obstacles such as the level of hardware support that was much less than what we have today. Later, Mandrake became Mandriva following litigation and the acquisition of Conectiva in 2005. The organisation has declined since those heady days and it became defunct during 2015. Its legacy continues though in the form of two spin-off projects so all the work of forebears has not been lost.
It was the uncertainty surrounding the future of Mandriva that originally caused this project to be started. Beginnings have been promising so this is a one to watch though you have to wonder if the now community-based OpenMandriva is stealing some of its limelight.
Of the pair that is listed here, it is OpenMandriva which is a continuation of the now-defunct Mandriva. Seeing how things progress for a project with user-friendliness at its heart will be interesting in these days when Debian, Ubuntu and Linux Mint are so pervasive. Even with those, there are KDE options so there is a challenge in place.
Not every distro falls in the above categories and some that you find here may surprise you. There are some better-known names like OpenSUSE that go their way.
This distro has a very specific role in life: powering dedicated computer firewall appliances. While I can picture using it on an older machine set aside for securing an internet connection, there does seem to be more to this project than that and the strength of the firewall is sufficient for securing corporate networks as well. The people behind IPFire sell their appliance products too with a rack-mountable option as well as a smaller free-standing one.
This is a special purpose flavour of Linux dedicated to security testing. Of course, it is your systems or those of others for which you have permission to be examining…
Here is another distro apart from Ubuntu that has an African name, the Zulu for big chief this time around. It came to my notice among the pages of Micro Mart and uses MATE, XFCE, Enlightenment and KDE as its desktop environment choices.
SuSE Linux was one of the first Linux distros that I started to explore and I even had it loaded on my home PC as a secondary operating system for quite a while too before my attention went elsewhere. Only for a PC Plus cover-mounted CD, it never might have discovered it and it bested Redhat, which was as prominent then as Fedora is today. When SuSE fell into Novell’s hands, it became both openSUSE and SuSE Linux Enterprise Edition. The former is the community and the latter is what Novell, now itself an Attachmate Group company, offers to business customers. As it happens, I continue to keep an eye on openSUSE and even had it on a secondary PC before font resolution deficiencies had me looking elsewhere. While it’s best known for its KDE variant, there is a GNOME one too and it is this that I have been examining.
There was a time when this was being touted as an Ubuntu killer but it never seems to have made good on that promise. Recent troubles within the project haven’t helped either, especially with a long wait between releases.
It is harder and harder to create a Linux distro that is very different from the rest but this one uses application virtualisation for added security. You can organise your software into different domains so that you work more securely when moving data between applications from different domains.
The acronym stands for Superb Mini Server and that provides the intent of this Italian distro. Slackware is its basis and the inclusion of Webmin is more than a strong hint that it is built for remote management too. Also part of the package is the sorts of tooling that you’d need for a web server so it’s not just for file storage and there’s firewall management available too.
The name sounded similar for some reason and I reckon that’s because Samsung has smartphones running Tizen on sale. The whole point of the project is to power mobile computing platforms with only the mention of netbooks sullying an otherwise non-PC target market that includes tablets and TV’s. It’s overseen by the Linux Foundation too.
Though it hasn’t been updated for more than a year now, there is an interesting concept here: tailoring desktop environments and software according to the user’s computer power. KDE is kept for Deluxe and SOHO editions while XFCE is used for the standard edition and there is an even more lightweight version available too.
It may tiresome but this distro is chasing Windows users with more gusto than most. That’s not all because they are selling laptops with OS installed on them too.