Technology Tales

Adventures & experiences in contemporary technology

What to do when a GPG signature becomes invalid for a package repository on Linux Mint

12th September 2024

During a package update on my main Linux system, I encountered the following kind of error message:

An error occurred during the signature verification. The repository is not updated and the previous index files will be used. GPG error: https://cli.github.com/packages stable InRelease: The following signatures were invalid: EXPKEYSIG <GPG Key> GitHub CLI

The message indicated a problem with the GPG signature verification for the GitHub CLI repository. The cause was that the signature for the repository was invalid, preventing the package manager from updating the repository’s index files. The first step then was to remove the invalid GPG key using the following command:

sudo apt-key del <GPG Key>

With the invalid GPG key removed, the next step is to add the new GPG key for the GitHub CLI repository by issuing the following command:

curl -fsSL https://cli.github.com/packages/githubcli-archive-keyring.gpg | sudo tee /usr/share/keyrings/githubcli-archive-keyring.gpg > /dev/null

Once I had the new GPG key, I was able to use my usual system update process without any problem. The error message was gone, and updates and upgrades proceeded as intended.

  • All the views that you find expressed on here in postings and articles are mine alone and not those of any organisation with which I have any association, through work or otherwise. As regards editorial policy, whatever appears here is entirely of my own choice and not that of any other person or organisation.

  • Please note that everything you find here is copyrighted material. The content may be available to read without charge and without advertising but it is not to be reproduced without attribution. As it happens, a number of the images are sourced from stock libraries like iStockPhoto so they certainly are not for abstraction.

  • With regards to any comments left on the site, I expect them to be civil in tone of voice and reserve the right to reject any that are either inappropriate or irrelevant. Comment review is subject to automated processing as well as manual inspection but whatever is said is the sole responsibility of the individual contributor.