TOPIC: FONT
Self hosting Google fonts
14th November 2022
One thing that I have been doing across my websites is to move away from using Google web fonts, using the advice on the Switching.Software website. While I have looked at free web font directories like 1001 Free Fonts or DaFont, they do not have the full range of bolding and character sets that I desire, so I opted instead for the Google Webfonts Helper website. That not only offered copies of what Google has, but also created a portion of CSS that I could add to a stylesheet on a website, making things more streamlined. At the same time, I also took the opportunity to change some of the fonts that were being used for the sake of added variety. Open Sans is good, but there are other acceptable sans-serif options like Mulish or Nunita as well, so these got used.
Worth the attention?
21st July 2010
The latest edition of Web Designer has features and tutorials on modern trends, including new ways to use fonts and typography in websites. One thing that's at the heart of the attention is the @font-face CSS selector. It's what allows you to break away from the limitations of whatever fonts your visitors might have on their PC's to use something available remotely.
In principle, that sounds like a great idea, yet there are caveats. The first of these is the support for the @font-face selector in the first place, though modern browsers I have tested handle this reasonably well. These include the latest versions of Firefox, Internet Explorer, Opera and Chrome. While the new fonts may render OK, there's a short delay in the full loading of a web page. With Firefox, the rendering seems to treat the process like an interleaved image, so you may see fonts from your own PC before the remote ones come into place, a not too ideal situation in my opinion. Also, I have found that this is more noticeable on the Linux variant of the browser than its Windows counterpart. Loading a page that is predominantly text is another scenario where you'll see the behaviour more clearly. Having a sizeable image file loading seems to make things less noticeable. Otherwise, you may see a short delay to the loading of a web page because the fonts have to be downloaded first. Opera is a particular offender here, with IE8 loading things rather quickly and Chrome not being too bad either.
In the main, I have been using Google's Fonts Directory but, in the interests of supposedly getting a better response, I tried using font files stored on a test web server only to discover that there was more of a lag with the fonts on the web server. While I do not know what Google has done with their set-up, using their font delivery service appears to deliver better performance in my testing, so it'll be my choice for now. Though there's Typekit too, I'll be hanging onto to my money in the light of my recent experiences.
After my brush with remote font loading, I am inclined to wonder if the current hype about fonts applied using the @font-face directive is deserved until browsers get better and faster at loading them. As things stand, they may be better than before, while the jury's still out for me, with Firefox's rendering being a particular irritant. Of course, things can get better...